To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Le 23/01/2011 01:58, s...@apache.org a écrit :
> Author: sebb
> Date: Sun Jan 23 00:58:07 2011
> New Revision: 1062304
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062304&view=rev
> Log:
> MATH-496 Create FastMath copySign methods
I was also creating these methods.
I have created all the missing on
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz has an issue affecting its community
integratio
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 23 January 2011 09:58, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 23/01/2011 01:58, s...@apache.org a écrit :
>> Author: sebb
>> Date: Sun Jan 23 00:58:07 2011
>> New Revision: 1062304
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062304&view=rev
>> Log:
>> MATH-496 Create FastMath copySign methods
>
> I was als
On 23 January 2011 11:57, sebb wrote:
> On 23 January 2011 09:58, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Le 23/01/2011 01:58, s...@apache.org a écrit :
>>> Author: sebb
>>> Date: Sun Jan 23 00:58:07 2011
>>> New Revision: 1062304
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062304&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> MATH-4
Hi Sebastian,
Le 23/01/2011 13:07, sebb a écrit :
> On 23 January 2011 11:57, sebb wrote:
>> On 23 January 2011 09:58, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Le 23/01/2011 01:58, s...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: sebb
Date: Sun Jan 23 00:58:07 2011
New Revision: 1062304
URL: http://s
On 23 January 2011 12:35, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
>
> Le 23/01/2011 13:07, sebb a écrit :
>> On 23 January 2011 11:57, sebb wrote:
>>> On 23 January 2011 09:58, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 23/01/2011 01:58, s...@apache.org a écrit :
> Author: sebb
> Date: Sun Jan 23 00:58
On 23 January 2011 05:52, wrote:
> Author: julius
> Date: Sun Jan 23 05:52:42 2011
> New Revision: 1062330
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062330&view=rev
> Log:
> CODEC-99 - Base64.encodeBase64String() should not chunk
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/codec/trunk/src/java/org/apac
Hello.
> [...]
>
> I hope I will have a reliable version of scalb in the next few hours.
>
> Once scalb is ready, I will also commit hypot. It is already coded and
> teste, but it relies on scalb to avoid overflow/underflow (and in fact
> it helps me testing scalb).
Do you keep an eye on the ti
I think it would be useful to split the FastMathTest class into 2 or 3 classes.
FastMathTest - individual method tests
FastMathPerformanceTest - the performance test
FastMathGenericTest - tests to compare against all StrictMath methods
(the current reflection-based tests)
I think it would definit
Le 23/01/2011 15:24, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hello.
Hi Gilles,
>
>> [...]
>>
>> I hope I will have a reliable version of scalb in the next few hours.
>>
>> Once scalb is ready, I will also commit hypot. It is already coded and
>> teste, but it relies on scalb to avoid overflow/underflow (and
Hi Sebb,
Le 23/01/2011 15:51, sebb a écrit :
> I think it would be useful to split the FastMathTest class into 2 or 3
> classes.
>
> FastMathTest - individual method tests
> FastMathPerformanceTest - the performance test
> FastMathGenericTest - tests to compare against all StrictMath methods
> (
On 23 January 2011 14:57, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 23/01/2011 15:24, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>> Hello.
>
> Hi Gilles,
>
>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> I hope I will have a reliable version of scalb in the next few hours.
>>>
>>> Once scalb is ready, I will also commit hypot. It is already coded and
>>> t
Hi all guys,
I'm here to ask your help to finalize the 2.0 version of pool
component, IMHO the following important steps are fondamental before
publishing at least the first alpha:
* POOL-172: I added the MBean required interfaces, but due to the
lack of JMX tests the issue shouldn't be considere
Hi all guys,
I would like to propose a new sandbox to experiment a fresh,
different, new set of Digester APIs that strongly uses a DSL for rules
configuration.
As described in the original proposal[1], the idea comes from a James
Carman's comment on an old Digester issue, so his
help/guidance/mento
Thanks for restarting the discussion of this topic, Gilles.
Here is a first attempt at some principles for exceptions management
in [math], followed by an illustration using the ConvergenceException
case discussed in MATH-487. The principles are no doubt incomplete
and some may be wrong and/or no
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I'm here to ask your help to finalize the 2.0 version of pool
> component, IMHO the following important steps are fondamental before
> publishing at least the first alpha:
>
> * POOL-172: I added the MBean required interfaces
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I would like to propose a new sandbox to experiment a fresh,
> different, new set of Digester APIs that strongly uses a DSL for rules
> configuration.
> As described in the original proposal[1], the idea comes from a James
> C
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> Le 23/01/2011 15:51, sebb a écrit :
>> I think it would be useful to split the FastMathTest class into 2 or 3
>> classes.
>>
>> FastMathTest - individual method tests
>> FastMathPerformanceTest - the performance test
>> FastMath
Hi Phil!!!
don't worry, no apologizes are needed, that's open source and we all
participate simply because we love it :)
The roadmap is more than clear, thanks for sharing it, I'll start
studying both Tomcat JDBC and Lang concurrency stuff so I can
contribute as well :)
Thanks a lot, have a nice da
Hi Phil,
thanks for the feedbacks!!! Yes, sorry for the miswriting, I meant
s/TLP/Commons Proper Component :P
Thanks again, have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 1:23 P
Two books I found valuable for working on Java concurrency:
1. Java Concurrency In Practice, by Brian Goetz
2. Concurrent Programming In Java, by Doug Lea
-Adrian
On 1/23/2011 11:02 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi Phil!!!
don't worry, no apologizes are needed, that's open source and we all
partic
Hi Adrian,
thanks for the suggestions, I think I'll buy the Doug Lea's one :P
Thanks again, have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Adrian Crum
wrote:
> Two books I found valuable for working on Java concurrency:
>
Personally, I would prefer to see an earlier release of [pool] 2.0 to be able
to use Generics ASAP.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 13:48
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [pool] help needed for poo
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Gregory
> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 14:37
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [pool] help needed for pool2.0 - proposal for a release plan
>
> Personally, I would prefer to see an earlier release of [pool] 2.0 to be
> able to use Generics ASA
Hi Phil,
Le 23/01/2011 19:27, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Thanks for restarting the discussion of this topic, Gilles.
>
> Here is a first attempt at some principles for exceptions management
> in [math], followed by an illustration using the ConvergenceException
> case discussed in MATH-487. The pri
Hi Gary,
I suggest we can push a beta release first, WDYT? I'd like to see the
Generics in action too :P
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Gary Gregory
>> Sent: Sunday
It feels like a lot of changes have gone in recently and I am not sure if the
project is in a consistent state. It feels like a lot is in flux.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: simone.trip...@gmail.com [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of Simone Tripodi
> Sent: Sunday, Janua
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> It feels like a lot of changes have gone in recently and I am not sure if the
> project is in a consistent state. It feels like a lot is in flux.
>
If we are going to release a 2.0 without rewriting the
implementations, we at least need to f
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Le 23/01/2011 19:27, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>> Thanks for restarting the discussion of this topic, Gilles.
>>
>> Here is a first attempt at some principles for exceptions management
>> in [math], followed by an illustration using
Hello.
> > Thanks for restarting the discussion of this topic, Gilles.
> >
> > Here is a first attempt at some principles for exceptions management
> > in [math], followed by an illustration using the ConvergenceException
> > case discussed in MATH-487. The principles are no doubt incomplete
> >
Le 23/01/2011 22:10, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>>
>> Le 23/01/2011 19:27, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>>> Thanks for restarting the discussion of this topic, Gilles.
>>>
>>> Here is a first attempt at some principles for exceptions manageme
Le 23/01/2011 22:12, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hello.
>
>>> Thanks for restarting the discussion of this topic, Gilles.
>>>
>>> Here is a first attempt at some principles for exceptions management
>>> in [math], followed by an illustration using the ConvergenceException
>>> case discussed in MAT
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> Hello.
>
>> > Thanks for restarting the discussion of this topic, Gilles.
>> >
>> > Here is a first attempt at some principles for exceptions management
>> > in [math], followed by an illustration using the ConvergenceException
>> > case di
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>>
>> Le 23/01/2011 19:27, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>>> Thanks for restarting the discussion of this topic, Gilles.
>>>
>>> Here is a first attempt at some principles for exception
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I would like to propose a new sandbox to experiment a fresh,
> different, new set of Digester APIs that strongly uses a DSL for rules
> configuration.
> As described in the original proposal[1], the idea comes from a James
> C
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:57 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 23 January 2011 09:58, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Le 23/01/2011 01:58, s...@apache.org a écrit :
>>> Author: sebb
>>> Date: Sun Jan 23 00:58:07 2011
>>> New Revision: 1062304
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062304&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>>
Hi.
> > [...]
> >
> >> Concerning point 1), there are two ways to advertise the exception.
> >> Javadoc only, or Javadoc plus throws clause. I personnaly would prefer
> >> Javadoc plus throws clause as it is simpler to make sure we didn't
> >> forget anything (using the trick of temporarily chang
On 23 January 2011 22:18, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:57 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 23 January 2011 09:58, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Le 23/01/2011 01:58, s...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: sebb
Date: Sun Jan 23 00:58:07 2011
New Revision: 1062304
URL: http://
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:54 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 23 January 2011 22:18, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:57 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 23 January 2011 09:58, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 23/01/2011 01:58, s...@apache.org a écrit :
> Author: sebb
> Date: Sun Jan 23 00:58:07 2
Hi Rahul!!! :)
thanks for your feedbacks!!! this time I would like to experiment in
the sandbox an almost complete rewrite of Digester, simplifying the
actual design centralizing the configuration - and loosing
retro-compatibility. Moreover I would like doing a strong code
polishing, removing depre
We normally hold a formal vote on commons parent releases first.
On 24 January 2011 01:13, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Can someone do the honors and push commons-parent 18 to the repository?
> Gary Gregory
> Senior Software Engineer
> Rocket Software
> 3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 * Atlanta, GA 30326
On 24 January 2011 00:16, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:54 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 23 January 2011 22:18, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:57 AM, sebb wrote:
On 23 January 2011 09:58, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 23/01/2011 01:58, s...@apache.org a écrit :
Sebb: Thank you for the procedural pointer.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 21:18
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: Publish commons-parent 18
>
> We normally hold a formal vote on commons parent releases first.
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Rahul!!! :)
> thanks for your feedbacks!!! this time I would like to experiment in
> the sandbox an almost complete rewrite of Digester, simplifying the
> actual design centralizing the configuration - and loosing
> retro-compatibility. M
On 23 January 2011 23:17, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Sun Jan 23 23:17:18 2011
> New Revision: 1062572
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062572&view=rev
> Log:
> @version 1.5
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/codec/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/codec/language/ColognePhonetic
Hi Rahul! :)
good point, I think that this is yet another good reason to work on
sandbox before, I'll try to stay close as much as possible to the
current Digester concept, my idea/purpose/intensions are providing a
new Digester and not replacing it.
Of course, suggestions/participation/feedbacks/g
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:15 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 24 January 2011 00:16, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:54 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 23 January 2011 22:18, Phil Steitz wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:57 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 23 January 2011 09:58, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Rahul! :)
> good point, I think that this is yet another good reason to work on
> sandbox before, I'll try to stay close as much as possible to the
> current Digester concept, my idea/purpose/intensions are providing a
> new Digester and
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 21:34
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1062572 -
> /commons/proper/codec/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/codec/language/Colo
> gnePhonetic.java
>
> On 23 January 2011 23:1
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-collections4 has an issue affecting its community integration.
Thi
53 matches
Mail list logo
