> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Gregory
> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 14:37
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [pool] help needed for pool2.0 - proposal for a release plan
> 
> Personally, I would prefer to see an earlier release of [pool] 2.0 to be
> able to use Generics ASAP.

I meant "earlier" not in Phil's schedule but earlier as before re-implementing 
pool guts.

Gary

> 
> Gary
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 13:48
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [pool] help needed for pool2.0 - proposal for a release plan
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Simone Tripodi
> > <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Hi all guys,
> > > I'm here to ask your help to finalize the 2.0 version of pool
> > > component, IMHO the following important steps are fondamental before
> > > publishing at least the first alpha:
> > >
> > >  * POOL-172: I added the MBean required interfaces, but due to the
> > > lack of JMX tests the issue shouldn't be considered closed;
> > >  * POOL-176;
> > >  * POOL-173, POOL-177, POOL-178: these can be take in consideration as
> > > part of the same refactoring group.
> > >  * make pools fields volatile, where possible.
> > >
> > > Is there anyone that does have spare time to help me?
> > > Many thanks in advance, have  anice weekend!!!
> >
> > I apologize for being very slow on [pool] recently.  Too many things
> > going on.  I have been working, however, on getting a 1.5.6 bugfix
> > release out.  All of the bugs marked 1.5.6 impact the 2.0 code, so we
> > need to get them resolved in any case.
> >
> > I think we also agreed that we were going to rewrite the core
> > implementation of GOP, GKOP for 2.0 using JDK 1.5+ concurrency,
> > borrowing ideas (and maybe code) from Tomcat's jdbc-pool module.  I
> > would still like to do that.  We should all take a careful look at the
> > Tomcat code and also the concurrency stuff in [lang] and talk about
> > how we are going to do this.
> >
> > I would like to get a pool 1.5.6 and DBCP 1.3.1/1.4.1 out ASAP to fix
> > the bugs that are impacting users as we work to finalize the API and
> > rework the implementation in pool 2.0.  Help on the 1.5.6 bugs would
> > be greatly appreciated.  Hijacking as this may be, help on the [dbcp]
> > bugs would also be appreciated :)
> >
> > For me personally, priorities are
> >  0) [math] 2.2 release (almost done)
> >  1) [pool] 1.5.6
> >  2) [dbcp] 1.3.1/1.4.1
> >  3) [pool] 2.0
> >  4) [dbcp] 2.0
> >
> > I would very much like to be involved in the pool rewrite, so any help
> > I can get with 1) and 2) would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Simo
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> > > http://www.99soft.org/
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to