Hi Phil!!!
don't worry, no apologizes are needed, that's open source and we all
participate simply because we love it :)
The roadmap is more than clear, thanks for sharing it, I'll start
studying both Tomcat JDBC and Lang concurrency stuff so I can
contribute as well :)
Thanks a lot, have a nice day!!!
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Simone Tripodi
> <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> I'm here to ask your help to finalize the 2.0 version of pool
>> component, IMHO the following important steps are fondamental before
>> publishing at least the first alpha:
>>
>>  * POOL-172: I added the MBean required interfaces, but due to the
>> lack of JMX tests the issue shouldn't be considered closed;
>>  * POOL-176;
>>  * POOL-173, POOL-177, POOL-178: these can be take in consideration as
>> part of the same refactoring group.
>>  * make pools fields volatile, where possible.
>>
>> Is there anyone that does have spare time to help me?
>> Many thanks in advance, have  anice weekend!!!
>
> I apologize for being very slow on [pool] recently.  Too many things
> going on.  I have been working, however, on getting a 1.5.6 bugfix
> release out.  All of the bugs marked 1.5.6 impact the 2.0 code, so we
> need to get them resolved in any case.
>
> I think we also agreed that we were going to rewrite the core
> implementation of GOP, GKOP for 2.0 using JDK 1.5+ concurrency,
> borrowing ideas (and maybe code) from Tomcat's jdbc-pool module.  I
> would still like to do that.  We should all take a careful look at the
> Tomcat code and also the concurrency stuff in [lang] and talk about
> how we are going to do this.
>
> I would like to get a pool 1.5.6 and DBCP 1.3.1/1.4.1 out ASAP to fix
> the bugs that are impacting users as we work to finalize the API and
> rework the implementation in pool 2.0.  Help on the 1.5.6 bugs would
> be greatly appreciated.  Hijacking as this may be, help on the [dbcp]
> bugs would also be appreciated :)
>
> For me personally, priorities are
>  0) [math] 2.2 release (almost done)
>  1) [pool] 1.5.6
>  2) [dbcp] 1.3.1/1.4.1
>  3) [pool] 2.0
>  4) [dbcp] 2.0
>
> I would very much like to be involved in the pool rewrite, so any help
> I can get with 1) and 2) would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Phil
>
>
>
>
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to