On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Gary Gregory <ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com> wrote: > It feels like a lot of changes have gone in recently and I am not sure if the > project is in a consistent state. It feels like a lot is in flux. >
If we are going to release a 2.0 without rewriting the implementations, we at least need to fix the bugs reported against 1.5.5 first. I think it is a much better idea to do the reimplementation first so we - and users - have just one stabilization period for 2.0 to deal with and we don't have to backport all of the 1.5.x fixes. I was actually going to recommend that we delete the org.apache.commons.pool tree in trunk and just start rewriting the impl in pool2. Phil > Gary > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: simone.trip...@gmail.com [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf >> Of Simone Tripodi >> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 14:48 >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: [pool] help needed for pool2.0 - proposal for a release plan >> >> Hi Gary, >> I suggest we can push a beta release first, WDYT? I'd like to see the >> Generics in action too :P >> Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Gary Gregory >> <ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com> wrote: >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Gary Gregory >> >> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 14:37 >> >> To: Commons Developers List >> >> Subject: RE: [pool] help needed for pool2.0 - proposal for a release >> plan >> >> >> >> Personally, I would prefer to see an earlier release of [pool] 2.0 to be >> >> able to use Generics ASAP. >> > >> > I meant "earlier" not in Phil's schedule but earlier as before re- >> implementing pool guts. >> > >> > Gary >> > >> >> >> >> Gary >> >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> >> > From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com] >> >> > Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 13:48 >> >> > To: Commons Developers List >> >> > Subject: Re: [pool] help needed for pool2.0 - proposal for a release >> plan >> >> > >> >> > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Simone Tripodi >> >> > <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > > Hi all guys, >> >> > > I'm here to ask your help to finalize the 2.0 version of pool >> >> > > component, IMHO the following important steps are fondamental before >> >> > > publishing at least the first alpha: >> >> > > >> >> > > * POOL-172: I added the MBean required interfaces, but due to the >> >> > > lack of JMX tests the issue shouldn't be considered closed; >> >> > > * POOL-176; >> >> > > * POOL-173, POOL-177, POOL-178: these can be take in consideration >> as >> >> > > part of the same refactoring group. >> >> > > * make pools fields volatile, where possible. >> >> > > >> >> > > Is there anyone that does have spare time to help me? >> >> > > Many thanks in advance, have anice weekend!!! >> >> > >> >> > I apologize for being very slow on [pool] recently. Too many things >> >> > going on. I have been working, however, on getting a 1.5.6 bugfix >> >> > release out. All of the bugs marked 1.5.6 impact the 2.0 code, so we >> >> > need to get them resolved in any case. >> >> > >> >> > I think we also agreed that we were going to rewrite the core >> >> > implementation of GOP, GKOP for 2.0 using JDK 1.5+ concurrency, >> >> > borrowing ideas (and maybe code) from Tomcat's jdbc-pool module. I >> >> > would still like to do that. We should all take a careful look at the >> >> > Tomcat code and also the concurrency stuff in [lang] and talk about >> >> > how we are going to do this. >> >> > >> >> > I would like to get a pool 1.5.6 and DBCP 1.3.1/1.4.1 out ASAP to fix >> >> > the bugs that are impacting users as we work to finalize the API and >> >> > rework the implementation in pool 2.0. Help on the 1.5.6 bugs would >> >> > be greatly appreciated. Hijacking as this may be, help on the [dbcp] >> >> > bugs would also be appreciated :) >> >> > >> >> > For me personally, priorities are >> >> > 0) [math] 2.2 release (almost done) >> >> > 1) [pool] 1.5.6 >> >> > 2) [dbcp] 1.3.1/1.4.1 >> >> > 3) [pool] 2.0 >> >> > 4) [dbcp] 2.0 >> >> > >> >> > I would very much like to be involved in the pool rewrite, so any help >> >> > I can get with 1) and 2) would be greatly appreciated. >> >> > >> >> > Phil >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > Simo >> >> > > >> >> > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> >> > > http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> > > >> >> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> - >> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
