On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Matt Sanford wrote:
>
> On Dec 16, 2008, at 03:36 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Ken Tanaka wrote:
>>>
>>> Your new patch looks good, I would say that it should be committed to the
>>> project.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I have no cycles to eva
On Dec 16, 2008, at 03:36 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Ken Tanaka
wrote:
Your new patch looks good, I would say that it should be committed
to the
project.
I have no cycles to evaluate [pipeline] contributions, but I can get
stuff into the [pipeline] trunk
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Ken Tanaka wrote:
> Your new patch looks good, I would say that it should be committed to the
> project.
>
I have no cycles to evaluate [pipeline] contributions, but I can get
stuff into the [pipeline] trunk if thats OK. Here is my suggestion, if
you guys are upt
Your new patch looks good, I would say that it should be committed to
the project.
Thanks,
Ken
Matt Sanford wrote:
Hi there,
I had forgotten to include the pom.xml. I added that change and
made the other one you mentioned as well.
Thanks;
— Matt Sanford
On Dec 16, 2008, at 11:49 AM,
Hi there,
I had forgotten to include the pom.xml. I added that change and
made the other one you mentioned as well.
Thanks;
— Matt Sanford
On Dec 16, 2008, at 11:49 AM, Ken Tanaka wrote:
Matt,
What do you think of adding to the pom.xml
commons-math
commons-math
1.2
Matt,
What do you think of adding to the pom.xml
commons-math
commons-math
1.2
true
and using SynchronizedDescriptiveStatistics instead of
DescriptiveStatisticsImpl, which is now deprecated (as of commons-math-1.2)?
-Ken
Ken Tanaka wrote:
Matt,
I'd like to look
Matt,
I'd like to look over your changes, but I'm not a committer either. I
looked through the patch for issue 261 and it looked good, but haven't
run it in the project yet.
-Ken Tanaka
Matt Sanford wrote:
Hi all,
I have several pending JIRA issues that contain patches to Commons
Pipe
Not [pipeline] specific, but ...
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Matt Sanford wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>Alas, no. I've never had an issue with any other ASF project where I was
> in a position to redistribute back to the community.
>
Note that sandbox components (especially) may not have a lo
Hi there,
Alas, no. I've never had an issue with any other ASF project
where I was in a position to redistribute back to the community.
Thanks;
— Matt Sanford
On Dec 13, 2008, at 04:42 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
If not, would it be possible to get commit
access to sandbox/pipeline?
M
> If not, would it be possible to get commit
> access to sandbox/pipeline?
Matt, are you by any chance a committer to any other ASF project yet?
cheers
--
Torsten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For
Hi all,
I have several pending JIRA issues that contain patches to
Commons Pipeline [1] I would like to contribute. Most of these are new
features to allow pipelines to run in a production environment more
effectively (statistics, JMX management, etc). Are there any
committers on the
11 matches
Mail list logo
