On Dec 16, 2008, at 03:36 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Ken Tanaka <ken.tan...@noaa.gov>
wrote:
Your new patch looks good, I would say that it should be committed
to the
project.
<snip/>
I have no cycles to evaluate [pipeline] contributions, but I can get
stuff into the [pipeline] trunk if thats OK. Here is my suggestion, if
you guys are upto it:
Step 0: All substantial contributors sign ICLAs. I know you've done it
already Ken. Matt, please follow this email for details:
http://commons.markmail.org/message/7dvo4xwel4q7rwkb
Just faxed my CLA.
Step 1: Record consensus in JIRA tickets about which patches need to
be applied (please use JIRA comments if possible so its clearer).
Step 2: I'll try to apply patches where Step 1 is done. Nudge on this
list as needed.
We'll go from there if this sounds OK -- and if so, lets start with
pending item in Step 0.
Thanks to both of you for your work on [pipeline].
-Rahul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
