On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Ken Tanaka <ken.tan...@noaa.gov> wrote: > Your new patch looks good, I would say that it should be committed to the > project. > <snip/>
I have no cycles to evaluate [pipeline] contributions, but I can get stuff into the [pipeline] trunk if thats OK. Here is my suggestion, if you guys are upto it: Step 0: All substantial contributors sign ICLAs. I know you've done it already Ken. Matt, please follow this email for details: http://commons.markmail.org/message/7dvo4xwel4q7rwkb Step 1: Record consensus in JIRA tickets about which patches need to be applied (please use JIRA comments if possible so its clearer). Step 2: I'll try to apply patches where Step 1 is done. Nudge on this list as needed. We'll go from there if this sounds OK -- and if so, lets start with pending item in Step 0. Thanks to both of you for your work on [pipeline]. -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
