I wrote an article about how Apache Commons Lang could use Java::Geci to
keep JavaDoc up to date. It will be published on Wednesday 16:00CEST time
on https://javax0.wordpress.com I copy the text of the article here so that
you can read before it is published and also if you have any comment before
Response inline
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:55 PM Peter Verhas wrote:
>
> [snip...]
> Paul King
>
> >You can stop using the JavadocAssertionTestSuite at any time.
> >The code will still be in the Javadoc as documentation but just won't
> >be tested any more as part of your test suite.
>
> This
>Runtime retention is a potential problem, as an extra binary may be needed.
>The jar might no longer be a drop-in replacement.
That is exactly while the annotations are an option only to use.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 4:17 PM sebb wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 14:55, Peter Verhas wrote:
> >
>
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 14:55, Peter Verhas wrote:
>
> Bruno P. Kinoshita>But if you could perhaps show the pros and cons,
>
> There is a slight overhead marking and naming the code snippets and also
> the code segments where the snippets should be inserted. It is slightly
> more complex than just
Bruno P. Kinoshita>But if you could perhaps show the pros and cons,
There is a slight overhead marking and naming the code snippets and also
the code segments where the snippets should be inserted. It is slightly
more complex than just copy-paste but not a big deal. If the unit test
lines are not
I haven't used Geci, so can't really comment on all the things it
might be capable of.
With respect to something equivalent to Python doctests, in the Groovy
project we
have JavadocAssertionTestBuilder and JavadocAssertionTestSuite classes.
Feel free to look to those for inspiration (at least).
F
: dev@commons.apache.org
主题: [LANG] Q: introduction of new development tool
I have seen looking over the code of the LANG3 project that there are a lot
of places where the code is copy/paste. Many times these copy/paste code is
the result of the shortages of the Java language. We implement methods
In Python doctests are handy, where you can write documentation with code
blocks, that can be executed with a unit-test running tool, validating the docs.
It's the first time I heard about Geci. But if you could perhaps show the pros
and cons, what is the maintenance involved, whether it would c
There is such a thing we used to call 'code slurping' where when I
co-authored "Java Persistence with Hibernate Second Edition" [1], we
automatically compiled, ran, and slurped in Java code into the XHTML source
for the book using https://github.com/4thline/lemma, meaning zero Java
code duplicatio
The idea of automatically using unit tests as code samples in the
documentation sounds great! This sounds fairly interesting to me.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 08:00, Peter Verhas wrote:
> I have seen looking over the code of the LANG3 project that there are a lot
> of places where the code is copy/
I have seen looking over the code of the LANG3 project that there are a lot
of places where the code is copy/paste. Many times these copy/paste code is
the result of the shortages of the Java language. We implement methods that
look more or less the same but they have to be created for all primitiv
this repository." error.
## Introduction
* In the first paragraph, the link to the Apache Commons RDF is pointing to
/index.md, and causing a 404. Not sure if this is due to the way the site was
built? But probably worth checking. The link in the third paragraph is wrong
too. Instead of ind
just skimmed through the rest, out of time, sorry.
Gary
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:09 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
wrote:
> As raised in the recent vote, Commons RDF could do with an
> introduction to RDF for people who have not used RDF before. The API
> should be quite suitable for RDF
As raised in the recent vote, Commons RDF could do with an
introduction to RDF for people who have not used RDF before. The API
should be quite suitable for RDF beginners, as unlike say Jena or
Sesame they should not be so easily overwhelmed by the API size.
Here's my first attempt at s
2015-01-23 20:55 GMT+01:00 Mark Roberts :
> My name is Mark Roberts and I work in the Programming Languages and
> Software Engineering group (PLSE) at the University of Washington. (
> http://www.cs.washington.edu/research/plse)
>
> Our team develops and supports a number of open source tools. On
Le 23/01/2015 20:55, Mark Roberts a écrit :
> My name is Mark Roberts and I work in the Programming Languages and Software
> Engineering group (PLSE) at the University of Washington.
> (http://www.cs.washington.edu/research/plse)
>
> Our team develops and supports a number of open source tools.
Mark,
Welcome to the ML! We are slowly edging to releasing 6.0...
Gary
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> My name is Mark Roberts and I work in the Programming Languages and
> Software Engineering group (PLSE) at the University of Washington. (
> http://www.cs.washington.ed
My name is Mark Roberts and I work in the Programming Languages and Software
Engineering group (PLSE) at the University of Washington.
(http://www.cs.washington.edu/research/plse)
Our team develops and supports a number of open source tools. One of the main
ones, Daikon (http://plse.cs.washi
evelopment. I will post on other
> thread(s) the issue(s) I have in mind, and leave this as an introduction of
> myself.
>
> I do not know how people normally introduce themself in open source project
> communities as this is my first involvement, so please bare over with me if
>
Henri,
Thank you very much! Please allow me some time to get code committed to the
sandbox - I wasn't expecting things to happen so fast.
I will look into Joda Time - thanks for the heads up.
-Adrian
--- On Thu, 3/4/10, Henri Yandell wrote:
> From: Henri Yandell
> Subject: Re: I
s not)
would be cool. We've not had much fun trying to write solid code on
top of the standard Java date code :)
Hen
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> adrianc
>
>
> --- On Thu, 3/4/10, Mladen Turk wrote:
>
>> From: Mladen Turk
>> Subject: R
adrianc
--- On Thu, 3/4/10, Mladen Turk wrote:
> From: Mladen Turk
> Subject: Re: Introduction
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Thursday, March 4, 2010, 9:26 PM
> On 03/05/2010 06:08 AM, Adrian Crum
> wrote:
> > My login? To what? Repo? Jira?
> >
On 03/05/2010 06:08 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
My login? To what? Repo? Jira?
Your apache username, meaning you wish the SVN access.
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional comm
My login? To what? Repo? Jira?
--- On Thu, 3/4/10, Henri Yandell wrote:
> From: Henri Yandell
> Subject: Re: Introduction
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Thursday, March 4, 2010, 8:17 PM
> There's a very in depth and
> bureaucratic membership process.
There's a very in depth and bureaucratic membership process.
Q1: What's your login?
Q2: Have you answered Q1? :)
On the Convert codebase - don't feel the need to have to adapt the
existing one unless you want to base your code on it. Stick it in as
'ofbiz-convert' or something and we can argue th
Welcome! I am not on the PMC, but commons is a pretty easy place to work. If
you would like to move Convert from dormant into the sandbox I suspect you
would meet little resistence since the policy here is failry liberal with
respect to giving ASF committers access to the commons sandbox.
Ralph
Hello all. My name is Adrian Crum and I am a PMC member of the Apache Open For
Business project (OFBiz).
Apache OFBiz is an ERP application, and it contains some technologies that
would be suitable for spinning off into stand-alone libraries.
One of those technologies is a Java object type conv
Hi, Christian.
Thanks for you opinion, advice and interest.
> At least you'll have to invest some time. If you start you better take
a long breath and learn to be patient :-)
Yes, I see. However, I am concerned about it.
> The API you proposed itself looks interesting - can you explain t
Hi,
> however, I am worrying about I don`t have 'commit authority' when
> it goes to sandbox.
> So, I`d like to know how to obtain 'commit authority' when it goes to
> sandbox. Is it possible?
here are two interesting links for you:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/getinvolved.html
http://common
--- On Sun, 3/22/09, Min Cha wrote:
> From: Min Cha
> Subject: Re: Robust-Task introduction
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Cc: "incubator-general"
> Date: Sunday, March 22, 2009, 12:49 AM
> Hi, Matt.
> Thanks for your interest and opinion.
&
>
> -Matt
>
> --- On Sat, 3/21/09, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
> > From: Niclas Hedhman
> > Subject: Re: Robust-Task introduction
> > To: gene...@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc: dev@commons.apache.org
> > Date: Saturday, March 21, 2009, 4:23 AM
> > On Fri
for thought anyway.
-Matt
--- On Sat, 3/21/09, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> From: Niclas Hedhman
> Subject: Re: Robust-Task introduction
> To: gene...@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: dev@commons.apache.org
> Date: Saturday, March 21, 2009, 4:23 AM
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:04
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Min Cha wrote:
> I wonder whether I am understanding a message from you.
> Do you think this project should or can be a component in Commons?
Could become...
> If so, I would like to know how to be a component in Commons.
Well, it depends. The Commons communit
Thanks for your very nice answer. That makes the difference clear.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Min Cha wrote:
> Hi. ted.
> Thanks for your question.
>
> ...
> First, Robust-Task is based on DSL(Domain Specific Langueage). It makes
> code
> more READABLE. You can compare with the code styl
Hi. ted.
Thanks for your question.
In general, MQ is using to send messages among distribued servers in
enterprise environment.
I think that workflow you mentioned is workflow on the viewpoint of
integration.
On the other hands, Robust-Task handles general worlflow on one process or
one marchine.
How is this different from things like OpenMQ (from Sun) or ActiveMQ
(apache)?
These do workflow pretty well.d
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Min Cha wrote:
> Hi, Niclas.
> Thanks for your opinion.
>
> I wonder whether I am understanding a message from you.
> Do you think this project should
I think this is a neat thing that Commons might pick up on, as I see a
problem of it to be large enough for its own community.
Cheers
Niclas
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Min Cha wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I am developing a framework called as Robust-Task.
> Robust-Task is a framework which helps
Hi, Niclas.
Thanks for your opinion.
I wonder whether I am understanding a message from you.
Do you think this project should or can be a component in Commons?
If so, I would like to know how to be a component in Commons.
IMHO, Robust-Task has a possibility to be a good contributor to Java and
A
Hi, all.
I am developing a framework called as Robust-Task.
Robust-Task is a framework which helps you write READABLE code when you need
to express complex or long business flow.
(Recently, 0.1 concept version was released.)
I would like to see that the idea of Robust-Task is valuable through the
39 matches
Mail list logo
