On 19 December 2011 08:53, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 12/17/11 7:55 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> Another slightly odd looking thing is to have
>>> org.apache.commons.sanselan.common as a package. There is also a util
>>> packages. I wonder I this stuff can be mov
Hi Phil,
Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/17/11 7:55 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Another slightly odd looking thing is to have
>> org.apache.commons.sanselan.common as a package. There is also a util
>> packages. I wonder I this stuff can be moved around in some way that
>> looks and feels less scattere
On 12/17/11 7:55 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Another slightly odd looking thing is to have
> org.apache.commons.sanselan.common as a package. There is also a util
> packages. I wonder I this stuff can be moved around in some way that
> looks and feels less scattered.
>
> Op Ed:
> On a different tak,
Another slightly odd looking thing is to have
org.apache.commons.sanselan.common as a package. There is also a util
packages. I wonder I this stuff can be moved around in some way that
looks and feels less scattered.
Op Ed:
On a different tak, personally, I've never liked sanselan as a package
in
On 17 December 2011 13:09, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2011, at 5:58, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 17 December 2011 06:05, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:54 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 December 2011 20:49, Gar
On Dec 17, 2011, at 5:58, sebb wrote:
> On 17 December 2011 06:05, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:54 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>
On 16 December 2011 20:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:43 PM,
On 17 December 2011 06:05, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:54 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> > On 16 December 2011 20:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:43 PM, sebb wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> On 16 December 20
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:54 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> > On 16 December 2011 20:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:43 PM, sebb wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 16 December 2011 17:27, Simone Tripodi
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > AH yes, that
On 16 December 2011 23:35, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:54 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 16 December 2011 20:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:43 PM, sebb wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 16 December 2011 17:27, Simone Tripodi
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > AH yes, that's because S
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:54 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 December 2011 20:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:43 PM, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 16 December 2011 17:27, Simone Tripodi
> >> wrote:
> >> > AH yes, that's because Sanselan came from the Incubator and hasn't
> >> > been up
On 16 December 2011 20:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:43 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 16 December 2011 17:27, Simone Tripodi
>> wrote:
>> > AH yes, that's because Sanselan came from the Incubator and hasn't
>> > been updated yet :P
>>
>> Yes - that's good (as it happens).
>>
>> T
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:43 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 December 2011 17:27, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
> > AH yes, that's because Sanselan came from the Incubator and hasn't
> > been updated yet :P
>
> Yes - that's good (as it happens).
>
> The previous (incubator) Maven release was under the groupId
On 16 December 2011 18:43, sebb wrote:
> On 16 December 2011 17:27, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> AH yes, that's because Sanselan came from the Incubator and hasn't
>> been updated yet :P
>
> Yes - that's good (as it happens).
>
> The previous (incubator) Maven release was under the groupId
> org.apac
On 16 December 2011 17:27, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> AH yes, that's because Sanselan came from the Incubator and hasn't
> been updated yet :P
Yes - that's good (as it happens).
The previous (incubator) Maven release was under the groupId
org.apache.sanselan, and the package was also o.a.sanselan
AH yes, that's because Sanselan came from the Incubator and hasn't
been updated yet :P
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> It looks like the first thing that should happen before a 1.0 is a
> repackage under o.a.c.
>
> Gary
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simon
It looks like the first thing that should happen before a 1.0 is a
repackage under o.a.c.
Gary
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:28 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 16 December 2011 15:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Shouldn't we update the code to Java 5 a
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:28 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 December 2011 15:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Shouldn't we update the code to Java 5 at least before a release? So
> > that it looks and feels modern? The commons-io dep could be updated
> > then too. Same for JUnit.
>
> Updating to Java 1.5 p
On 16 December 2011 15:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Shouldn't we update the code to Java 5 at least before a release? So
> that it looks and feels modern? The commons-io dep could be updated
> then too. Same for JUnit.
Updating to Java 1.5 properly is a lot of work, but if there are
people willing t
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Shouldn't we update the code to Java 5 at least before a release? So
> that it looks and feels modern? The commons-io dep could be updated
> then too. Same for JUnit.
>
+1
> Gary
>
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simo
Shouldn't we update the code to Java 5 at least before a release? So
that it looks and feels modern? The commons-io dep could be updated
then too. Same for JUnit.
Gary
On Dec 16, 2011, at 5:30, sebb wrote:
> On 16 December 2011 06:27, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>> Thank you, this seems like what
On 16 December 2011 06:27, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Thank you, this seems like what I needed. It turns out gpg-agent has to be
> used to sign.
>
> Unfortunately the Internet bandwidth required to upload all the files is
> vast, so a Sanselan release is probably only going to happen in January.
P
Thank you, this seems like what I needed. It turns out gpg-agent has to be
used to sign.
Unfortunately the Internet bandwidth required to upload all the files is
vast, so a Sanselan release is probably only going to happen in January.
In the meanwhile, does my key have to linked into the web of t
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:33 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 15 December 2011 17:10, sebb wrote:
> > On 15 December 2011 16:58, Damjan Jovanovic
> wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I promised to start the Sanselan release process early this week, but
> I've
> >> been having problem after problem:
> >>
> >> 1. The
On 15 December 2011 17:10, sebb wrote:
> On 15 December 2011 16:58, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I promised to start the Sanselan release process early this week, but I've
>> been having problem after problem:
>>
>> 1. The instructions on http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html say
I use http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
Gary
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> I promised to start the Sanselan release process early this week, but I've
> been having problem after problem:
>
> 1. The instructions on http://commons.apache.org/releases/pr
On 15 December 2011 16:58, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> I promised to start the Sanselan release process early this week, but I've
> been having problem after problem:
>
> 1. The instructions on http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html say
> that you run a variation of "mvn install" to
Hi Damjan!
I suggest you approaching the wiki page[1] first to see how components
are released in commons, at least the described method is the one I
follow when proposing RCs.
HTH, have a nice day!
-Simo
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripod
Hi
I promised to start the Sanselan release process early this week, but I've
been having problem after problem:
1. The instructions on http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html say
that you run a variation of "mvn install" to build the release... but this
only generates the .jar files, not
28 matches
Mail list logo
