On 16 December 2011 18:43, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16 December 2011 17:27, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:
>> AH yes, that's because Sanselan came from the Incubator and hasn't
>> been updated yet :P
>
> Yes - that's good (as it happens).
>
> The previous (incubator) Maven release was under the groupId
> org.apache.sanselan, and the package was also o.a.sanselan
>
> The package name has been changed already, so we can change the Maven
> groupId to o.a.commons, which will automatically give Nexus access.
>
> The groupId commons-sanselan does not appear to have been used, which is 
> lucky.

By that I mean the Maven coords in the current POM have not been used
in a release, so we are not tied to them.

>
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It looks like the first thing that should happen before a 1.0 is a
>>> repackage under o.a.c.
>
>>>
>>> Gary
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to