On 16 December 2011 18:43, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 December 2011 17:27, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: >> AH yes, that's because Sanselan came from the Incubator and hasn't >> been updated yet :P > > Yes - that's good (as it happens). > > The previous (incubator) Maven release was under the groupId > org.apache.sanselan, and the package was also o.a.sanselan > > The package name has been changed already, so we can change the Maven > groupId to o.a.commons, which will automatically give Nexus access. > > The groupId commons-sanselan does not appear to have been used, which is > lucky.
By that I mean the Maven coords in the current POM have not been used in a release, so we are not tied to them. > >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> It looks like the first thing that should happen before a 1.0 is a >>> repackage under o.a.c. > >>> >>> Gary >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org