On 11/28/13, 12:22 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>
> Am 28.11.2013 09:05, schrieb Thomas Neidhart:
>> On 11/28/2013 04:09 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>> Vote closed, results were:
>>>
>>> +1:
>>> Damjan Jovanovic
>>>
>>> No other votes were cast.
>>>
>>> Vote fails since majority approval needs at least
Am 28.11.2013 09:05, schrieb Thomas Neidhart:
> On 11/28/2013 04:09 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>> Vote closed, results were:
>>
>> +1:
>> Damjan Jovanovic
>>
>> No other votes were cast.
>>
>> Vote fails since majority approval needs at least 3 votes of +1 ->
>> aborting release.
>
> Hi Damjan,
2013/11/28 sebb
> On 28 November 2013 08:05, Thomas Neidhart
> wrote:
> > On 11/28/2013 04:09 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> >> Vote closed, results were:
> >>
> >> +1:
> >> Damjan Jovanovic
> >>
> >> No other votes were cast.
> >>
> >> Vote fails since majority approval needs at least 3 votes of
On 28 November 2013 08:05, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/28/2013 04:09 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>> Vote closed, results were:
>>
>> +1:
>> Damjan Jovanovic
>>
>> No other votes were cast.
>>
>> Vote fails since majority approval needs at least 3 votes of +1 ->
>> aborting release.
>
> Hi Damja
On 11/28/2013 04:09 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Vote closed, results were:
>
> +1:
> Damjan Jovanovic
>
> No other votes were cast.
>
> Vote fails since majority approval needs at least 3 votes of +1 ->
> aborting release.
Hi Damjan,
sorry that this vote failed, and I hope you still continue
Sad!
Sorry I didn't have to check.
I hope it's not your final decision (yes final keyword is important here :-) )
On 28 November 2013 14:09, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Vote closed, results were:
>
> +1:
> Damjan Jovanovic
>
> No other votes were cast.
>
> Vote fails since majority approval needs a
Vote closed, results were:
+1:
Damjan Jovanovic
No other votes were cast.
Vote fails since majority approval needs at least 3 votes of +1 ->
aborting release.
Damjan
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Please vote on releasing commons-imaging 1.0 from RC7.
>
> Last fail
Hi Damjan,
it seems that we have already some changes and get a new RC, but I've tested
the source tarball with my complete compiler zoo (incl. Java 8) without any
problems. At least that looks great ;-)
Cheers,
Jörg
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Please vote on releasing commons-imaging 1.0 from
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> > Hi Damjan,
>>
>> Hi Emmanuel
>>
>> > I reviewed the API, here are my observations:
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Firstly, we d
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Hi Damjan,
>
> Hi Emmanuel
>
> > I reviewed the API, here are my observations:
>
> Thank you.
>
> Firstly, we discussed several options before for the 1.0 release, and
> agreed t
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Emmanuel Bourg
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Damjan,
> >>
> >> Le 26/11/2013 06:31, Damjan Jovanovic a écrit :
> >>
> >> > Firstly, we discussed several
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Hi Damjan,
>
> Hi Emmanuel
>
> > I reviewed the API, here are my observations:
>
> Thank you.
>
> Firstly, we discussed several options before for the 1.0 release, and
> agreed t
In the site's "Latest Sanselan Release" section, this link is broken:
https://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC7/release-history.html
It should be https://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC7/history.html
Gary
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Please vote o
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
>> Hi Damjan,
>>
>> Le 26/11/2013 06:31, Damjan Jovanovic a écrit :
>>
>> > Firstly, we discussed several options before for the 1.0 release, and
>> > agreed that the contents of trunk
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Damjan,
>
> Le 26/11/2013 06:31, Damjan Jovanovic a écrit :
>
> > Firstly, we discussed several options before for the 1.0 release, and
> > agreed that the contents of trunk would be quickly pushed out as 1.0
> > with minimal changes (ma
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> [Snip]
>
> > - The PixelParser classes in
> > org.apache.commons.imaging.formats.bmp.pixelparsers seems to be used
> > only internally by BmpImageParser. They can't be made pack
Hi Damjan,
Le 26/11/2013 06:31, Damjan Jovanovic a écrit :
> Firstly, we discussed several options before for the 1.0 release, and
> agreed that the contents of trunk would be quickly pushed out as 1.0
> with minimal changes (many/most users are using 1.0-SNAPSHOT), and
> then the big API redesig
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Damjan,
Hi Emmanuel
> I reviewed the API, here are my observations:
Thank you.
Firstly, we discussed several options before for the 1.0 release, and
agreed that the contents of trunk would be quickly pushed out as 1.0
with minimal cha
Hi Damjan,
I reviewed the API, here are my observations:
- Would that make sense to move the LZM implementation to commons-compress?
- What is the purpose of CachingInputStream and CachingOutputStream,
there is no Javadoc on these classes. Could they be merged into commons-io?
- Why is ZLibUtil
Please vote on releasing commons-imaging 1.0 from RC7.
Last failed vote was for RC5, RC6 had a bust POM. Many improvements
were made since:
* PMD configured better and all PMD warnings fixed, the ones remaining
now are bugs in PMD itself.
* Test coverage greatly improved in many areas, only a few
20 matches
Mail list logo
