On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> - Incubator then TLP
> - Incubator then Commons Math
There's no reason to distinguish those. It's initially the same, and
both directions would be open, anyways.
Jochen
--
The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"
http://www.k
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:39:38 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
Do we need some kind of ranked vote with choices like:
Where should Commons Math go (in alpha order)?
- Commons Attic
- Incubator then TLP
- Incubator then Commons Math
- Stay put
- TLP
- Create components (with code extracted from the
> On Jun 17, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> I don't see the need for a consensus. If some people want to write an
> incubator proposal, they can write it. If they can sell it to the
> incubator, they have a podling. Meanwhile, the code remains Apache
> Licensed, and anyone who wa
I don't see the need for a consensus. If some people want to write an
incubator proposal, they can write it. If they can sell it to the
incubator, they have a podling. Meanwhile, the code remains Apache
Licensed, and anyone who wants to commit things to it back here can do
that. Eventually, there w
ydgreg...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 10:40
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...
>
> Do we need some kind of ranked vote with choices like:
>
> Where should Commons Math go (in alpha order)?
> - Commons Attic
> -
Do we need some kind of ranked vote with choices like:
Where should Commons Math go (in alpha order)?
- Commons Attic
- Incubator then TLP
- Incubator then Commons Math
- Stay put
- TLP
?
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:31 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> We should probably tally the votes at this point,
We should probably tally the votes at this point, but it is pretty clear
that there is no consensus, unfortunately. I honestly have no idea what to
do at this point. I have limited connectivity today.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:51 PM Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> James Carman schrieb am Sa., 11. Jun
James Carman schrieb am Sa., 11. Juni 2016 um
05:47 Uhr:
> Since it has been suggested that the previously passing vote should be
> voided, I propose we vote again to move Commons Math to a TLP:
>
> +1 - Yes, move Commons Math to a TLP
> -1 - No, do not move Commons Math to a TLP
>
> The vote wil
Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> +1 for a move to Incubator, rather than a TLP, as Math now needs to
> find its new ground and direction, and in particular grow its active
> developer base.
>
>
> The incubator is great for reducing the distance for moving from
> contributor to committer, and for let
the GPL.
-Original Message-
From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 11:56
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:39 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> We would take math through the i
+1 for a move to Incubator, rather than a TLP, as Math now needs to
find its new ground and direction, and in particular grow its active
developer base.
The incubator is great for reducing the distance for moving from
contributor to committer, and for letting everyone get a say in what
direction
IMO, the primary advantagae of the incubator would be, that the
project could have its own mailing list, etc.
Thus, it would be independent from the happenings at dev@commons, etc.
Which is, (IMO) exactly, what is required right now.
Jochen
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
rs to be addressed. Not the least is
>>>>>> how the code base will be imported and, because it is from an Apache
>>>>>> Project, how it will be left behind too. That definition can start
>>>>>> here and then be refined on the general-incubat
ampion (perhaps), mentors, and a sufficient body of
>>>>> initial committers. It is important for those who would form the
>>>>> initial core for a podling to learn enough about how incubation works.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Dennis
>>>>>
body of
>>>>> initial committers. It is important for those who would form the
>>>>> initial core for a podling to learn enough about how incubation works.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Dennis
>>>>>
>>>>> Disclosure:
incubation works.
>>>>
>>>> - Dennis
>>>>
>>>> Disclosure:
>>>>
>>>> I have no idea how this might go. I am not a Commons Math
>>>> subject-matter expert, even though computational mathematics has some
>>
am not a Commons Math
>>> subject-matter expert, even though computational mathematics has some
>>> appeal for me. I still have my bound "Collect Algorithms from ACM,
>>> Volume 1: Algorithms 1-220." I did not hold onto the microfiche of
>>> later algorith
putational mathematics has some
>>> appeal for me. I still have my bound "Collect Algorithms from ACM,
>>> Volume 1: Algorithms 1-220." I did not hold onto the microfiche of
>>> later algorithms that were published in conjunction with the ACM
>>> Transactions on Mathematica
ACM,
>> Volume 1: Algorithms 1-220." I did not hold onto the microfiche of
>> later algorithms that were published in conjunction with the ACM
>> Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS). The latest (Algorithm
>> 959) is interesting although I have no ide
> -Original Message-
> From: Gilles [mailto:gil...@harfang.homelinux.org]
> Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 15:08
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...
>
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 14:33:58 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote
Transactions on Mathematical Software
> (TOMS). The latest (Algorithm 959) is interesting although I have no idea
> where to find the code and am dismayed that it is a library under the GPL.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@g
Message-
From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 11:56
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:39 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> We would take math through the incubator in order
hough I have no idea where to find the
code and am dismayed that it is a library under the GPL.
> -Original Message-
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 11:56
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] M
If this moves to Incubator you would become part of the Podling PMC and get a
write to vote and get commit rights. That is one of the advantages of moving
this to the incubator.
Ralph
> On Jun 12, 2016, at 11:23 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
> I'm willing to help, but I'm not sure that I have vo
Hi.
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 14:23:02 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
I'm willing to help, but I'm not sure that I have voting privileges
here since I don't have commit rights.
Your vote expresses what direction you'd like the project to take.
Do not hesitate to ask any questions that would help you ma
nal Message-
> > From: Jochen Wiedmann [mailto:jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 10:44
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...
> >
> > +1 (I think, we could have that: Gilles, myself, and I am cer
situation be different now?
- Dennis
> -Original Message-
> From: Jochen Wiedmann [mailto:jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 10:44
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...
>
> +1 (I think, we co
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:39 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> We would take math through the incubator in order to build community around
> it first. If we fail to do so, then we can decide its fate at that time. We
> haven't done a good job attracting new people to math here at all. It has
> always be
I'm willing to help, but I'm not sure that I have voting privileges here since
I don't have commit rights.
-Rob
> On Jun 12, 2016, at 1:43 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
> wrote:
>
> +1 (I think, we could have that: Gilles, myself, and I am certain,
> that a third person would step forward.
>
>> On Sa
+1 (I think, we could have that: Gilles, myself, and I am certain,
that a third person would step forward.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> -1 (binding)
>
> At least until there are enough people to have a viable PMC.
Jochen
-
We would take math through the incubator in order to build community around
it first. If we fail to do so, then we can decide its fate at that time. We
haven't done a good job attracting new people to math here at all. It has
always been maintained primarily by a select few.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 a
-1 (binding)
At least until there are enough people to have a viable PMC.
Ralph
> On Jun 10, 2016, at 8:47 PM, James Carman wrote:
>
> Since it has been suggested that the previously passing vote should be
> voided, I propose we vote again to move Commons Math to a TLP:
>
> +1 - Yes, move Com
Here's my +1 (binding).
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:47 PM James Carman
wrote:
> Since it has been suggested that the previously passing vote should be
> voided, I propose we vote again to move Commons Math to a TLP:
>
> +1 - Yes, move Commons Math to a TLP
> -1 - No, do not move Commons Math to a
Since it has been suggested that the previously passing vote should be
voided, I propose we vote again to move Commons Math to a TLP:
+1 - Yes, move Commons Math to a TLP
-1 - No, do not move Commons Math to a TLP
The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
Thank you,
James Carman
34 matches
Mail list logo
