Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] [math] top-level package name

2009-05-24 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Niall Pemberton" To: "Commons Developers List" Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 4:02 PM Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] [math] top-level package name On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: On Thu, May 21,

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] [math] top-level package name

2009-05-24 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Henri Yandell wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Luc Maisonobe >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Luc Maisonobe a écrit : >>> >>> So let's vote on this proposal: change the top level package name on [math] from org.apache.commons.m

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] [math] top-level package name

2009-05-23 Thread Gilles Sadowski
> > Of course, our way here is to come to agreement and it looks like we have > > not done that in this case.  My original vote (+1) was partly for > > consistency with the rest of commons and out of fear of "jar hell" > > scenarios.  I was swayed by Niall's argument and reflection on use cases > >

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] [math] top-level package name

2009-05-23 Thread Luc Maisonobe
James Carman a écrit : > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> Of course, our way here is to come to agreement and it looks like we have >> not done that in this case. My original vote (+1) was partly for >> consistency with the rest of commons and out of fear of "jar hell" >> s

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] [math] top-level package name

2009-05-23 Thread James Carman
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Of course, our way here is to come to agreement and it looks like we have > not done that in this case.  My original vote (+1) was partly for > consistency with the rest of commons and out of fear of "jar hell" > scenarios.  I was swayed by Ni

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] [math] top-level package name

2009-05-23 Thread Phil Steitz
Henri Yandell wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Luc Maisonobe a écrit : So let's vote on this proposal: change the top level package name on [math] from org.apache.commons.math to org.apache.commons.math2. [] +1 change the top level package name [] 0 I don

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] [math] top-level package name

2009-05-22 Thread Henri Yandell
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Luc Maisonobe a écrit : > >> So let's vote on this proposal: change the top level package name on >> [math] from org.apache.commons.math to org.apache.commons.math2. >> >> [] +1 change the top level package name >> []  0 I don't care >> [] -1

[RESULT] [VOTE] [math] top-level package name

2009-05-21 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Luc Maisonobe a écrit : > So let's vote on this proposal: change the top level package name on > [math] from org.apache.commons.math to org.apache.commons.math2. > > [] +1 change the top level package name > [] 0 I don't care > [] -1 keep the old name > > Vote open for 72 hours (up to Friday Ma

[RESULT] [VOTE] [math] top-level package name

2009-05-21 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Luc Maisonobe a écrit : > So let's vote on this proposal: change the top level package name on > [math] from org.apache.commons.math to org.apache.commons.math2. > > [] +1 change the top level package name > [] 0 I don't care > [] -1 keep the old name > > Vote open for 72 hours (up to Friday Ma