Re: NOTICE required for JcrUtils from Jackrabbit 2.4.0?

2016-05-19 Thread Jukka Zitting
tra NOTICE entries. Best, Jukka Zitting On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 4:02 AM Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > Hi, > > In reviewing an RC for Apache Commons VFS 2.1 > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/Zjouqd6cpmohrj3 > > we wondered about a file > > > https://github.com/apa

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Compress based on RC2

2010-08-13 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, [x] +1 release it Reviewed commons-compress-1.1-src.tar.gz (SHA1: fd728ec4374380831dc906b27d77b589b555a791). BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Compress based on RC1

2010-08-10 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, [x] +1 release it Tested with commons-compress-1.1-src.tar.gz (SHA1: eb2ae3125bae678a1615c0016e9bf7518771f26a) on Linux with Sun Java 1.6.0_16. Builds, passes all tests, and integrates well with Apache Tika. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Re: [IO] encapsulating open/close

2010-08-06 Thread Jukka Zitting
automatic resource management blocks [1] proposed for Java 7 and the @Cleanup annotation [2] from Project Lombok. [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/coin-dev/2009-April/001481.html [2] http://projectlombok.org/features/Cleanup.html BR, Jukka Zitting ---

Re: [IO] encapsulating open/close

2010-08-04 Thread Jukka Zitting
o use apache commons io and I am asking why this isn't there. I could > contribute this. Not sure if this is exactly what you're looking for, but have you seen the AutoCloseInputStream [1] class? [1] http://commons.apache.org/io/api-release/org/apache/commons/io/input/AutoCloseInputStream

Re: [IO] encapsulating open/close

2010-08-04 Thread Jukka Zitting
o use apache commons io and I am asking why this isn't there. I could > contribute this. Not sure if this is exactly what you're looking for, but have you seen the AutoCloseInputStream [1] class? [1] http://commons.apache.org/io/api-release/org/apache/commons/io/input/AutoCloseInputStream

Re: [compress] release 1.1?

2010-08-02 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote: > ...maybe then there is one more thing to squeeze in then Unless there's already a ready patch for this, I'd rather see the 1.1 release out than wait for a new improvement. BR,

Re: [compress] New release soon?

2010-05-04 Thread Jukka Zitting
1 and the remaining two issues seem to be pretty much done already. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [compress] New release soon?

2010-02-19 Thread Jukka Zitting
we think its already time. And I think it is +1 We'd love to use a new commons-compress release in Tika. Re: 1.1 vs 1.0.1; There's new public API in the codebase, so we should call the release 1.1. BR, Jukka Zitting -

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons Compress -

2009-12-13 Thread Jukka Zitting
runcated file Fixed in revision 890110. I didn't expect FileInputStream.skip() to happily skip past the end of the file! BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additiona

[cli] (or [cli2]?) Plans for CLI 2.0 release?

2009-11-11 Thread Jukka Zitting
e 2.0-alpha1 to make downstream projects happy without making strict backwards compatibility commitments? BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [io] [PATCH]Commons IO New Functionality, Minor Patches

2009-10-29 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, ... and please included "[io]" in the subject line to help people with filters on this list. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-m

Re: [PATCH]Commons IO New Functionality, Minor Patches

2009-10-29 Thread Jukka Zitting
me know. The latter change sounds like something that could break binary backwards compatibility. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [all] Filter suggestions

2009-10-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
ing reasonably accurate (95% or so) Gmail search pattern for Commons IO traffic: (list:(user.commons.apache.org OR dev.commons.apache.org) subject:io) OR (list:commits.commons.apache.org subject:proper/io) BR, Jukka Zitt

Filter suggestions

2009-10-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, Does anyone know of any sane way to filter the commons mailing list in Gmail? I have no way to keep up with the daily torrent of mail here, and so far I haven't found any reliable way to pick for example just the messages about Commons IO. BR, Jukka Zi

Re: [io] Towards the 2.0 release

2009-08-19 Thread Jukka Zitting
the purpose of Commons is to create reusable code, regardless of the scope or field of that reuse. And Commons IO is defined as "library of utilities to assist with developing IO functionality". IMHO utilities to help test IO code are c

[io] Towards the 2.0 release

2009-08-17 Thread Jukka Zitting
elease tag from Jira in favor of 2.0 as I don't believe there is much more interest in another 1.x release. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands

Re: [cli] Git mirror available

2009-05-27 Thread Jukka Zitting
repository and "git svn dcommit" will > commit to the Subversion repository. As mentioned by others, we'd love to see suggestions (better yet, patches) of improvements on the infrastructure-dev@ mailing list or in the INFRA Jira under the Git compone

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-compress-1.0 based on RC2 (Rev: 774630)

2009-05-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
I filed COMPRESS-72 so we remember to fix this for future releases. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: New sandbox project -- Apache Commons (Portable) Runtime

2009-04-06 Thread Jukka Zitting
sense to merge these codebases? BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[site] How is the Commons site built/deployed?

2009-04-01 Thread Jukka Zitting
but what binds them together?) and how the site is built and deployed. Any pointers? BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[compress] Successful use in Apache Tika

2009-03-26 Thread Jukka Zitting
to see the first two bytes of the stream. So, apart from tweaking the NOTICE file (see my other message), from my perspective the current compress trunk is ready for release. :-) [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-204 BR, Jukka Zitting

[compress] Code history in NOTICE

2009-03-26 Thread Jukka Zitting
we need to require, i.e. was this a requirement of the original contributions? If not, I'd rather move these notes to the README file. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For addit

Re: [ALL] Common location for DOAP files?

2009-03-18 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:54 AM, sebb wrote: > At present the doap files are in each project trunk, and therefore > presumably get copied to tags (and branches), where they don't really > make sense. They don't?

Re: [compress] Todos before release 1

2009-03-16 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > if Dennis has no time I can help out during Hackathon I'd be happy to help with any compress-related stuff on Tuesday during the Hackathon. BR, Jukka

Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper

2009-03-16 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:58 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > The compress component shall become a proper Commons component: [x] +1 Yes BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Promoting commons-compress to proper

2009-03-09 Thread Jukka Zitting
rhaps Ant (and selected Maven plugins, etc.) would be interested in using the component too. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [compress] Schedule for a release?

2009-02-26 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2009-02-26, Jukka Zitting wrote: >> I looked at the compress component in the sandbox and it's exactly >> what we could use in Apache Tika, see [1]. > > If you pick up the latest code from Ant instead you&

[compress] Schedule for a release?

2009-02-26 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, I looked at the compress component in the sandbox and it's exactly what we could use in Apache Tika, see [1]. What's the current status of the codebase? Any plans of graduation to Commons proper and of doing a 1.0 release? [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-204

Re: [io] Binary compatible

2009-02-14 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > org.apache.commons.io: > Bad > method org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.copyFileToDirectory(java.io.File, > java.io.File): type void in io-1.4, but type java.io.File in io-trunk > method org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.copy

Re: [io] Binary compatible

2009-02-14 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Stephen Colebourne > wrote: >> I reviewed some of HEAD of IO last night. It is currently binary >> incompatible with the 1.x series, yet the package name has not changed. > >

Re: [io] Binary compatible

2009-02-14 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > I reviewed some of HEAD of IO last night. It is currently binary > incompatible with the 1.x series, yet the package name has not changed. What incompatibilities are there? Can we fix them? BR, Jukka Z

Re: [io] Version for Java 1.4

2009-02-09 Thread Jukka Zitting
#x27;d copy and backport just the relevant classes into the Jackrabbit codebase. In any case I agree that having IO 2.0 out would be nice. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: New committer: Paul Benedict

2009-02-09 Thread Jukka Zitting
vember. Dan Fabulich became a sandbox > committer a couple of days ago. Welcome to all! BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons IO -

2009-02-07 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:36 PM, contin...@vmbuild.apache.org >> FilesystemObserverTestCase >> testFileCreate : >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: E[0 0 0

Re: [IO] svn commit: r741531

2009-02-07 Thread Jukka Zitting
new Eclipse install was not picking up my svn settings for revision 741531. I used the svn command line to commit revision 741562. I'll fix my Eclipse setup. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@common

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons IO -

2009-02-06 Thread Jukka Zitting
the failure locally. Can someone with Continuum access check what this is about? BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[io] Version for Java 1.4

2009-02-06 Thread Jukka Zitting
anch for a Java 1.4 (or older) version of Commons IO. Any thoughts on this? BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: Proposal: Commons SAX

2009-02-05 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Until we come up with consensus on where (Commons, Xerces or Cocoon) > we should place this proposed library, I'd like to start putting some > bits together in the Commons Sandbox. I've now set up a projec

[all] Use of svn keywords in source files

2009-02-05 Thread Jukka Zitting
scussed at length before. Any pointers? BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [general] How to link JIRA issues and commits

2009-02-04 Thread Jukka Zitting
really handy in cases where there was a typo in the Jira key included in the commit message. (Been there, done that...) BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mai

Re: [sandbox] Project template

2009-01-30 Thread Jukka Zitting
n parent etc. makes things even easier) Agreed, though it would still be helpful to have some guidelines on what's really expected versus what some components have just decided to include. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubsc

[sandbox] Project template

2009-01-29 Thread Jukka Zitting
ndbox/project-template BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: Proposal: Commons SAX

2008-12-31 Thread Jukka Zitting
n into the Commons portion of the project [*] or into another Apache project", which is exactly what I'm planning to do. [*] Is this wording a leftover from Jakarta days? BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe,

Re: Proposal: Commons SAX

2008-12-31 Thread Jukka Zitting
s well. We have a huge xml community already within the Cocoon project. That's another good option. How would Cocoon handle people who are interested in working on this code but not on other parts of Cocoon? BR, Jukka Zitting -

Federated commons and JCR

2008-12-18 Thread Jukka Zitting
s in Jackrabbit, but could adopt some quality, branding, and release practices from Apache Commons (details to be worked out). Would this be a good idea? [1] http://markmail.org/message/qqlvlwpgi5oauak6 [2] http://blog.generationjava.com/roller/bayard/entry/the-o

Re: Proposal: Commons SAX

2008-12-18 Thread Jukka Zitting
. > Xerces is currently just using XML Commons to maintain the XML APIs. Not > much else is going on there. So if this is no good fit for Apache > Commons, we'd have to talk to the Xerces people. I pinged the Xerces people abou

Proposal: Commons SAX

2008-12-17 Thread Jukka Zitting
pache/tika/sax/xpath/package-summary.html BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [all][nabla] proposition for a new project in sandbox

2008-04-14 Thread Jukka Zitting
r > derivatives too and represent the first step. Excellent, then I think "nabla" is a great name! BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [all][nabla] proposition for a new project in sandbox

2008-04-14 Thread Jukka Zitting
of the byte code operations would produce a computationally accurate derivative of the source function. Other than that the idea is interesting, and it would be cool to see how well it works in practice. Also, the name "nabla" would suggest that the component is designed for calculatin

Re: [all] ApacheCon EU 2008 - April 7 - 11

2008-02-20 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone planning to be at ApacheCon EU 2008? I'll be there. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [io] 2.0 Moving to minimum of JDK 1.5

2008-02-12 Thread Jukka Zitting
> foo(Type[]) when we > now have foo(List)) or foo(Iterable) +1 Sounds good to me. This discussion will be much more productive when we have concrete changes to look at. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [io] 2.0 Moving to minimum of JDK 1.5

2008-02-11 Thread Jukka Zitting
would benefit from Java 5 features, but they are also a minority. Do such isolated changes justify changing the entire API? Or do you have some other major changes in mind? BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI

Re: [io] 2.0 Moving to minimum of JDK 1.5

2008-02-11 Thread Jukka Zitting
rs the possibility to use as much Java 5 specifics as > possible in the > new API (varargs, new interfaces, generics, enums, ...). I still don't see the need to overhaul the entire API. Do we have some specific cases where switching to Java 5 features would be both backwards incompatib

Re: [io] 2.0 Moving to minimum of JDK 1.5

2008-02-08 Thread Jukka Zitting
m to keep such backports upwards compatible, so that a 1.x client would remain functional when deployed with IO 2.x in a Java 5 environment. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [io] 2.0 Moving to minimum of JDK 1.5

2008-02-08 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Feb 8, 2008 5:24 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/8/08, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If there's a class or interface, say o.a.c.io.SomeClass, that needs to > > be changed extensively to match "Java 5 style&quo

Re: [io] 2.0 Moving to minimum of JDK 1.5

2008-02-08 Thread Jukka Zitting
Java 5 is just an enabler of new features (generics, etc.), it doesn't magically make existing APIs obsolete. Sure, you probably want to adjust collection types, but that's just like any other API change request. BR, Jukka Zitting --

Re: [io] 2.0 Moving to minimum of JDK 1.5

2008-02-08 Thread Jukka Zitting
hat only uses those parts should be affected in any way by the upgrade. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 1.4 based on RC3

2008-01-20 Thread Jukka Zitting
were byte-equal. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [IO] Planning IO 1.4 release

2008-01-09 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Jan 9, 2008 11:04 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Henri and Jukka expressed interest on IO-137 - do you guys > want to / have time to look at this? Let's move it to post-1.4. The reset() issue still needs some thought and probably shouldn't be rushe

Re: [IO] Planning IO 1.4 release

2008-01-06 Thread Jukka Zitting
imiter API before the feature gets released. > IO-148 is done from my PoV - I left it open in case anyone wanted to > object to me renaming it today. If Gary and Jukka are happy then we > can mark it as fixed. I'm happy. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RereadableInputStream

2007-10-15 Thread Jukka Zitting
ly a growing buffer (optionally on disk) that keeps track of all bytes read from the stream, and restoring a state means rewinding the stream to the beginning of the buffer associated with that state. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubs