Hi, On Feb 8, 2008 3:49 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, you are suggesting having part of a release in the o.a.c.io > package and the other part in the o.a.c.io2?
No. I'd keep everything in o.a.c.io. If there's a class or interface, say o.a.c.io.SomeClass, that needs to be changed extensively to match "Java 5 style", then I'd name the modified version o.a.c.io.SomeClass2 (or something better if possible). I assume such cases to be the exception rather than the rule, so I don't see the point in renaming the entire package. Java 5 is just an enabler of new features (generics, etc.), it doesn't magically make existing APIs obsolete. Sure, you probably want to adjust collection types, but that's just like any other API change request. BR, Jukka Zitting --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
