Hi, On Feb 6, 2008 1:51 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So the changes are pretty minimal for IO - question is are these > incompatible changes with generics being erased? If not then perhaps > we can do this without breaking anything.
+1 If there are cases where we can't avoid breaking backwards compatibility, then let's use the name2 pattern on individual classes or interfaces instead of the entire o.a.c.io package. There are large parts of Commons IO that don't need to change when upgrading to Java 5 and I don't see why a client that only uses those parts should be affected in any way by the upgrade. BR, Jukka Zitting --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
