Re: [MATH] src/userguide/pom.xml does not use Commons Parent

On 1/8/15 7:02 PM, sebb wrote: > As the subject says. > > This makes it very tricky to compile & test with anything other than > the Maven JVM. > Recent versions of Maven require 1.6. > > Any objections to adding CP 36 as a parent? Yes. I just wasted an hour fiddling with the main [math] build tr

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4.1

On 1/8/15 3:28 PM, sebb wrote: > Just noticed - several test errors here: > > See What JDK is being used there? I get clean compile and tests under java version "1.5.0_22" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_22-b

[Commons Wiki] Update of "VfsExampleShell" by BerndEckenfels

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The "VfsExampleShell" page has been changed by BerndEckenfels: https://wiki.apache.org/commons/VfsExampleShell?action=diff&rev1=2&rev2=3 source/ }}} + Loading resources from the

[Commons Wiki] Trivial Update of "VfsExampleShell" by BerndEckenfels

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The "VfsExampleShell" page has been changed by BerndEckenfels: https://wiki.apache.org/commons/VfsExampleShell?action=diff&rev1=1&rev2=2 = Commons VFS Example Shell = - This page

[Commons Wiki] Update of "VfsExampleShell" by BerndEckenfels

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The "VfsExampleShell" page has been changed by BerndEckenfels: https://wiki.apache.org/commons/VfsExampleShell Comment: some VFS Example Shell examples New page: = Commons VFS Example

[MATH] src/userguide/pom.xml does not use Commons Parent

As the subject says. This makes it very tricky to compile & test with anything other than the Maven JVM. Recent versions of Maven require 1.6. Any objections to adding CP 36 as a parent? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...

Re: [All] Animal sniffer (was: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+)

On 9 January 2015 at 00:47, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > Am Fri, 9 Jan 2015 00:38:31 + > schrieb sebb : > >> Just tried the animal sniffer on NET (Java 1.5) - I added a call to >> new IOException(new Exception()) which is Java 1.6+ > > What Java did you use to start maven? Looks like Animal sniffe

Re: [All] Animal sniffer (was: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+)

Am Fri, 9 Jan 2015 00:38:31 + schrieb sebb : > Just tried the animal sniffer on NET (Java 1.5) - I added a call to > new IOException(new Exception()) which is Java 1.6+ What Java did you use to start maven? Looks like Animal sniffer itself uses Java 7 API. Gruss Bernd > It does detect the r

Re: [All] Animal sniffer (was: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+)

Just tried the animal sniffer on NET (Java 1.5) - I added a call to new IOException(new Exception()) which is Java 1.6+ It does detect the reference, but the error message is pretty hopeless - it does not show the class or even the jar in which it is found. Instead there are a load of what appear

[Commons Wiki] Update of "VfsReleaseState" by BerndEckenfels

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The "VfsReleaseState" page has been changed by BerndEckenfels: https://wiki.apache.org/commons/VfsReleaseState?action=diff&rev1=5&rev2=6 Comment: added site-todo * update testing/t

[Commons Wiki] Update of "VfsReleaseState" by BerndEckenfels

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The "VfsReleaseState" page has been changed by BerndEckenfels: https://wiki.apache.org/commons/VfsReleaseState?action=diff&rev1=4&rev2=5 Comment: work done: vfs-457 fixed This is

Re: [All] Animal sniffer (was: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+)

On 8 January 2015 at 21:21, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/08/2015 07:12 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 8 January 2015 at 17:29, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >>> >>> >>> Send from my mobile device >>> Am 08.01.2015 um 17:38 schrieb Thomas Neidhart : > On 01/08/2015 05:24 PM, sebb wrote: >> On

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4.1

Just noticed - several test errors here: See On 8 January 2015 at 19:24, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.4.1 from release > candidate 1. > > Tag name: > MATH_3_4_1_RC1 (signature can be check

Re: [All] Animal sniffer (was: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+)

On 01/08/2015 07:12 PM, sebb wrote: > On 8 January 2015 at 17:29, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> >> >> Send from my mobile device >> >>> Am 08.01.2015 um 17:38 schrieb Thomas Neidhart : >>> On 01/08/2015 05:24 PM, sebb wrote: > On 8 January 2015 at 16:13, Thomas Neidhart > wrote: >>

Jenkins build became unstable: Commons Math #14

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4.1

This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.4.1 from release candidate 1. Tag name: MATH_3_4_1_RC1 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v') Tag URL: Commit I

Re: [All] Animal sniffer (was: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+)

On 8 January 2015 at 17:29, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > > Send from my mobile device > >> Am 08.01.2015 um 17:38 schrieb Thomas Neidhart : >> >>> On 01/08/2015 05:24 PM, sebb wrote: On 8 January 2015 at 16:13, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/08/2015 04:44 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 8

Re: [Math] Java version (Was: [MATH] Jenkins build)

My clients started to use Java 7 a few months before, so I wouldn't choose Java 8. I know it's new and shinny and as a developer I'd love to play with it, but unfortunately, users are using it. I'd go for Java 7 and plan Java 8 for Math 5.0 On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:

Re: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+

Send from my mobile device > Am 08.01.2015 um 16:44 schrieb sebb : > >> On 8 January 2015 at 11:45, Thomas Neidhart >> wrote: >>> On 01/08/2015 12:25 PM, sebb wrote: On 8 January 2015 at 11:13, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/08/2015 11:22 AM, s...@apache.org wrote: > Repos

Re: [All] Animal sniffer (was: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+)

Send from my mobile device > Am 08.01.2015 um 17:38 schrieb Thomas Neidhart : > >> On 01/08/2015 05:24 PM, sebb wrote: >>> On 8 January 2015 at 16:13, Thomas Neidhart >>> wrote: On 01/08/2015 04:44 PM, sebb wrote: > On 8 January 2015 at 11:45, Thomas Neidhart > wrote: > On

Re: [Math] Next release: 4.0 or 3.5 ?

On 01/08/2015 05:25 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 08/01/2015 17:02, Phil Steitz a écrit : >> On 1/8/15 7:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> Le 08/01/2015 07:59, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : On 01/08/2015 02:40 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > > > >> On Jan 6, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Gilles wrote:

Re: [All] Animal sniffer (was: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+)

On 01/08/2015 05:24 PM, sebb wrote: > On 8 January 2015 at 16:13, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> On 01/08/2015 04:44 PM, sebb wrote: >>> On 8 January 2015 at 11:45, Thomas Neidhart >>> wrote: On 01/08/2015 12:25 PM, sebb wrote: We certainly need to add animal-sniffer to our release building

Re: [Math] Next release: 4.0 or 3.5 ?

Le 08/01/2015 17:02, Phil Steitz a écrit : > On 1/8/15 7:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Le 08/01/2015 07:59, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : >>> On 01/08/2015 02:40 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On Jan 6, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Gilles wrote: > > Hi. > > Do we head towards 4.0, s

[All] Animal sniffer (was: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+)

On 8 January 2015 at 16:13, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/08/2015 04:44 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 8 January 2015 at 11:45, Thomas Neidhart >> wrote: >>> On 01/08/2015 12:25 PM, sebb wrote: >>> We certainly need to add animal-sniffer to our release building process >>> to detect such things. >> >> D

Re: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+

On 01/08/2015 04:44 PM, sebb wrote: > On 8 January 2015 at 11:45, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> On 01/08/2015 12:25 PM, sebb wrote: >>> On 8 January 2015 at 11:13, Thomas Neidhart >>> wrote: On 01/08/2015 11:22 AM, s...@apache.org wrote: > Repository: commons-math > Updated Branches: >>

Re: [Math] Next release: 4.0 or 3.5 ?

On 1/8/15 7:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 08/01/2015 07:59, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : >> On 01/08/2015 02:40 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Jan 6, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Gilles wrote: Hi. Do we head towards 4.0, starting to implement the dreaded breakings? ;-)

Re: [Math] Next release: 4.0 or 3.5 ?

Le 08/01/2015 16:42, Gilles a écrit : > On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 10:24:49 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> >>> Le 08/01/2015 07:59, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : >>> > On 01/08/2015 02:40 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> On Jan 6

Re: [Math] Next release: 4.0 or 3.5 ?

Am Thu, 08 Jan 2015 16:42:14 +0100 schrieb Gilles : > On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 10:24:49 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe > > wrote: > > > >> Le 08/01/2015 07:59, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : > >> > On 01/08/2015 02:40 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > >>

Re: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+

Am Thu, 8 Jan 2015 15:44:34 + schrieb sebb : > On 8 January 2015 at 11:45, Thomas Neidhart > wrote: > > On 01/08/2015 12:25 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 8 January 2015 at 11:13, Thomas Neidhart > >> wrote: > >>> On 01/08/2015 11:22 AM, s...@apache.org wrote: > Repository: commons-math >

Re: [Math] Maven profile for running the examples?

On 8 January 2015 at 11:59, Gilles wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 01:20:20 +, sebb wrote: >> >> On 8 January 2015 at 00:25, Gilles wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 17:21:33 +, sebb wrote: On 7 January 2015 at 17:12, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > > > On 01/07/2015

Re: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+

On 8 January 2015 at 11:45, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/08/2015 12:25 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 8 January 2015 at 11:13, Thomas Neidhart >> wrote: >>> On 01/08/2015 11:22 AM, s...@apache.org wrote: Repository: commons-math Updated Branches: refs/heads/master c278ac388 -> 6a82f925

Re: [Math] Next release: 4.0 or 3.5 ?

On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 10:24:49 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote: On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 08/01/2015 07:59, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : > On 01/08/2015 02:40 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> On Jan 6, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Gilles wrote: >>> >>> Hi. >>> >>> Do we head t

Re: [Math] Next release: 4.0 or 3.5 ?

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 08/01/2015 07:59, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : > > On 01/08/2015 02:40 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Jan 6, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Gilles > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi. > >>> > >>> Do we head towards 4.0, starting to implement th

Re: [Math] Next release: 4.0 or 3.5 ?

Le 08/01/2015 07:59, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : > On 01/08/2015 02:40 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> On Jan 6, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Gilles wrote: >>> >>> Hi. >>> >>> Do we head towards 4.0, starting to implement the dreaded >>> breakings? ;-) >> >> How about starting a new 4.0 branch and kee

Re: [Math] Next release: 4.0 or 3.5 ?

Hi all, It seems several mials piled up before I can answer, so I'll try to catch up in one post. Le 08/01/2015 14:55, Gilles a écrit : > On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 07:53:06 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 6:17 AM, Gilles >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 01:25:42 +, sebb wrot

Re: [GIT] Getting started with Git and Eclipse

2015-01-07 21:05 GMT+01:00 sebb : > On 7 January 2015 at 17:57, Christopher wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:47 PM, sebb wrote: > > > >> On 7 January 2015 at 17:39, Christopher wrote: > >> > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:11 AM, sebb wrote: > >> > > >> >> I've just started trying to look at som

Re: [Math] Java version (Was: [MATH] Jenkins build)

2015-01-08 13:57 GMT+01:00 Martin Grotle Soukup < martin.grotle.sou...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > I am only a user of the library, but I would be excited to see CM take > advantage of the new features of java 8. > > Best regards, > Martin Grotle Soukup > > > 2015-01-08 12:34 GMT+01:00 Gilles : > > > Hi

Re: [Math] Next release: 4.0 or 3.5 ?

On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 07:53:06 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote: On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 6:17 AM, Gilles wrote: On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 01:25:42 +, sebb wrote: On 8 January 2015 at 00:43, Gilles wrote: On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 14:46:19 +, sebb wrote: On 7 January 2015 at 08:23, luc wrote: Le 2

Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons Math #11

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [Math] Java version (Was: [MATH] Jenkins build)

Hi, I am only a user of the library, but I would be excited to see CM take advantage of the new features of java 8. Best regards, Martin Grotle Soukup 2015-01-08 12:34 GMT+01:00 Gilles : > Hi. > > Raising this issue once again. > Are we going to upgrade the requirement for the next major relea

Re: [Math] Next release: 4.0 or 3.5 ?

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 6:17 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 01:25:42 +, sebb wrote: > >> On 8 January 2015 at 00:43, Gilles wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 14:46:19 +, sebb wrote: >>> On 7 January 2015 at 08:23, luc wrote: > > Le 2015-01-06 23:13, Gilles a

Re: [Math] Maven profile for running the examples?

On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 01:20:20 +, sebb wrote: On 8 January 2015 at 00:25, Gilles wrote: On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 17:21:33 +, sebb wrote: On 7 January 2015 at 17:12, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 01/07/2015 06:00 PM, sebb wrote: On 7 January 2015 at 16:29, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 01/07/

Re: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+

On 01/08/2015 12:25 PM, sebb wrote: > On 8 January 2015 at 11:13, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> On 01/08/2015 11:22 AM, s...@apache.org wrote: >>> Repository: commons-math >>> Updated Branches: >>> refs/heads/master c278ac388 -> 6a82f9258 >>> >>> >>> Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+ >> >> this is a bug an

Re: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+

On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 11:25:11 +, sebb wrote: On 8 January 2015 at 11:13, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 01/08/2015 11:22 AM, s...@apache.org wrote: Repository: commons-math Updated Branches: refs/heads/master c278ac388 -> 6a82f9258 Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+ this is a bug and worth a 3.4.1

[Math] Java version (Was: [MATH] Jenkins build)

Hi. Raising this issue once again. Are we going to upgrade the requirement for the next major release? [ ] Java 5 [ ] Java 6 [ ] Java 7 [ ] Java 8 [ ] Java 9 ? Gilles On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 10:34:20 +, sebb wrote: I've had to give up trying to get Continuum to use Git, so I set up a Je

Re: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+

On 8 January 2015 at 11:13, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/08/2015 11:22 AM, s...@apache.org wrote: >> Repository: commons-math >> Updated Branches: >> refs/heads/master c278ac388 -> 6a82f9258 >> >> >> Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+ > > this is a bug and worth a 3.4.1 release. I assumed it was a re

Re: [Math] Next release: 4.0 or 3.5 ?

On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 01:25:42 +, sebb wrote: On 8 January 2015 at 00:43, Gilles wrote: On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 14:46:19 +, sebb wrote: On 7 January 2015 at 08:23, luc wrote: Le 2015-01-06 23:13, Gilles a écrit : On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 23:10:33 +0100, Gilles wrote: Hi. Do we head towar

Re: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+

On 01/08/2015 11:22 AM, s...@apache.org wrote: > Repository: commons-math > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master c278ac388 -> 6a82f9258 > > > Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+ this is a bug and worth a 3.4.1 release. Could you please create an issue for it. Thanks, Thomas > > Project: http://git

Re: [MATH] Github pull request notifications don't work

Apache Camel's pull requests do show up on the dev list. It might be nice to see these. Otherwise, we might not know there is a contribution out there waiting for us. On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 5:53 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > it looks like the push request notifications are not set up for

Re: [MATH] Github pull request notifications don't work

2015-01-08 12:03 GMT+01:00 Gilles : > On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 11:53:05 +0100, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> it looks like the push request notifications are not set up for the new >> repository. I've opened https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/4 but >> nothing was send to the list. Since

Re: [Math] Next release: 4.0 or 3.5 ?

On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:40:08 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: On Jan 6, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Gilles wrote: Hi. Do we head towards 4.0, starting to implement the dreaded breakings? ;-) How about starting a new 4.0 branch and keeping head set up for 3.x so we can cut 3.4.1 when the bugs start coming i

Re: [MATH] Github pull request notifications don't work

On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 11:53:05 +0100, Benedikt Ritter wrote: Hi, it looks like the push request notifications are not set up for the new repository. I've opened https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/4 but nothing was send to the list. Since I don't know whether this is intentionally, I'll

[MATH] Github pull request notifications don't work

Hi, it looks like the push request notifications are not set up for the new repository. I've opened https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/4 but nothing was send to the list. Since I don't know whether this is intentionally, I'll not create an INFRA ticket for this. Benedikt -- http://peopl

[MATH] Jenkins build

I've had to give up trying to get Continuum to use Git, so I set up a Jenkins build for Math It seems Jenkins itself needs Java 1.6+, and the JAVA_1_x_HOME variables don't seem to have been set up on the Jenkins hosts, so the -Pjava-1.5 profile does not work as is. However I found that the JAVA_1

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons Math #1

See -- Started by user sebb Building remotely on ubuntu3 (Ubuntu ubuntu legacy-ubuntu) in workspace Cloning the remote Git repository Cloning repository htt