On 1/8/15 7:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 08/01/2015 07:59, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : >> On 01/08/2015 02:40 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Jan 6, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi. >>>> >>>> Do we head towards 4.0, starting to implement the dreaded >>>> breakings? ;-) >>> How about starting a new 4.0 branch and keeping head set up for 3.x so we >>> can cut 3.4.1 when the bugs start coming in against 3.4. >> +1 > Of course a branch is needed, but why consider master should be 3.x and > 4.0 should be a side branch.
I am OK either way. We just need to be able to easily cut 3.4.1. Due to my mistake, we need to do that ASAP, so whatever git games need to be played to get it set up so we can release from it, we need to do it. Phil > > If we consider 4.0 is the future and 3.x is only for bug fixes, then 4.0 > should be master and 3.x a side branch. This side branch could be > created later on, if needed. It is straightforward to create new > branches in git even from very old commits, so the branch creation can > be delayed until needed (and only if needed). > > best regards, > Luc > > >> Thomas >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > . > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
