On 1/8/15 7:02 PM, sebb wrote:
> As the subject says.
>
> This makes it very tricky to compile & test with anything other than
> the Maven JVM.
> Recent versions of Maven require 1.6.
>
> Any objections to adding CP 36 as a parent?

Yes.  I just wasted an hour fiddling with the main [math] build
trying to get it to work under JDK 1.5 so I could just run the
tests.  Adding more unseen cruft to builds is to be avoided unless
really necessary.  Honestly, a simple build.xml would be way easier
for people actually wanting to compile the examples to use. 

<rant>About 45 minutes in, I realized why I hate the way we use
maven.  We seem to want to create these monstrous "push one button"
things when what we need are small, sharp tools.  I really wish
there were a way to get to a well-factored, cleanly integrated set
of build scripts / tools instead of the morass of visible and hidden
xml that is our pom structure.   I would never design anything as
convoluted as the pom structure of math + commons parent + apache
parent + maven land as a solution to a programming problem.  But we
seem to want to just keep piling more stuff into it.  Aaargh!</rant>

Phil
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to