On 01/08/2015 05:25 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 08/01/2015 17:02, Phil Steitz a écrit : >> On 1/8/15 7:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> Le 08/01/2015 07:59, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : >>>> On 01/08/2015 02:40 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 6, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi. >>>>>> >>>>>> Do we head towards 4.0, starting to implement the dreaded >>>>>> breakings? ;-) >>>>> How about starting a new 4.0 branch and keeping head set up for 3.x so we >>>>> can cut 3.4.1 when the bugs start coming in against 3.4. >>>> +1 >>> Of course a branch is needed, but why consider master should be 3.x and >>> 4.0 should be a side branch. >> >> I am OK either way. We just need to be able to easily cut 3.4.1. >> Due to my mistake, we need to do that ASAP, so whatever git games >> need to be played to get it set up so we can release from it, we >> need to do it. > > Don't worry. > > I'm on it. I created the version and issue in Jira, and am currently > creating the release-candidates branch. > > Stay tuned for a new vote in the upcoming hours ...
I am fine with either approach, but just wanted to point out we should not stop supporting the 3.x branch, and I am also willing to invest time and energy into this. Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
