Re: [vfs] RAT report test data

Hi All, The RAT report needs to be clean IMO before we start a release. Each file must be excluded in the POM with a comment (IMO) as to why it is OK to exclude, or that file must be dealt with somehow (add header, remove, who knows). Gary On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote

[vfs] RAT report test data

Hello, currently the RAT report shows 20 text files and a few archives (all test data) with unknown license. Can we add that to some exclude, is it ok to keep the files in the RAT report or do I need to do something else before release? Gruss Bernd 20 Unknown Licenses *

Re: [parent] Jira report and "improvements" type

Am Sat, 20 Dec 2014 02:48:43 +0100 schrieb Bernd Eckenfels : > > Bug,New Feature,Task,Improvement,Wish,Test > > So should we add "improvement" here as well? Sorry I missed the fact it is already added. Any other idea what could cause this? Gruss Bernd ---

[parent] Jira report and "improvements" type

While preparing the [vfs] release I noticed that quite some Fixes which are mentioned in the changes.xml are not in the JIRA report. After digging a bit closer for some I guess it is due to the fact that those issues have been marked as "Improvement" in JIRA, which is not filtered by the parent:

RE: [vfs] next release minor or major version?

I have not forgotten about the todo list. Have been swamped at work and hope to get some of it done over the holidays. -Original Message- From: Bernd Eckenfels [mailto:e...@zusammenkunft.net] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 5:48 PM To: dev@commons.apache.org Subject: [vfs] next release mi

[vfs] next release minor or major version?

Hello, sorry for coming back to this topic, but I did not really received any oppinions or help on it, and I really want to do a release. I would like to release the VFS trunk as 2.1, because it contains a lot of bug fixes and is asked for by people. If we decide to release it as 3.0 (with the ch

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Release Commons Math 3.4

On 12/19/2014 04:54 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.4 from release > candidate 1. > > Tag name: > MATH_3_4_RC2 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v') > > Tag URL: > >

Re: Commons RDF

Hello, we (the Apache Commons Project) don't know the RDF standard or any existing implementations. We just provide a possibility for other projects to share code. If it is currently not clear how to share RDF library code, or what should be included, this should be discussed. Creating a new sandb

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-alpha2 based on RC1

2014-12-19 21:27 GMT+01:00 Oliver Heger : > > > > Am 19.12.2014 um 08:08 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > > > > > > Send from my mobile device > > > >> Am 18.12.2014 um 15:54 schrieb Gary Gregory : > >> > >>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Benedikt Ritter > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello Oliver, > >>> > >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-alpha2 based on RC1

Am 19.12.2014 um 08:08 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > > > Send from my mobile device > >> Am 18.12.2014 um 15:54 schrieb Gary Gregory : >> >>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >>> >>> Hello Oliver, >>> >>> I've tested with Maven 3.2.3 and Java 7 and 8. >>> >>> - The build w

[RESULT] Release Configuration 2.0-alpha2 based on RC1

The vote to release Commons Configuration 2.0-alpha2 has passed with the following votes: Gary Gregory: +1 Benedikt Ritter:+1 Thomas Neidhart:+1 Oliver Heger: +1 All votes are binding, no other votes were cast. Thanks to all who took the time to review, althou

Re: Commons RDF

On 19/12/14 08:58, Reto Gmür wrote: Apart from yours all reactions on the clerezza mailing lists where positive including the one from a contributor to the github-commons project. I'm sorry you feel that way - it was not my intention. With my first email [1] was intended to be positive and hig

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons BCEL - Apache Commons (Group (shared) Maven 3 Build Definition (Java 1.6))

Online report : https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=38973&projectId=241 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Fri 19 Dec 2014 16:20:02 + Finished at: Fri 19 Dec 2014 16:20:33 + Total time: 30s Build Trigger: Schedule

[VOTE][RC2] Release Commons Math 3.4

This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.4 from release candidate 1. Tag name: MATH_3_4_RC2 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v') Tag URL: Com

Re: [math] Improved release documentation with a direct URL for tag in vote email.

On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 16:10:55 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 19/12/2014 15:59, Gilles a écrit : On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:16:05 + (UTC), l...@apache.org wrote: [...] +Tag URL: + https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-math.git;a=snapshot;h=cf4a9d70c9ac24dd7196995390171150e4e56451;sf

Re: [math] Improved release documentation with a direct URL for tag in vote email.

Le 19/12/2014 15:59, Gilles a écrit : > On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:16:05 + (UTC), l...@apache.org wrote: >> [...] >> +Tag URL: >> + >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-math.git;a=snapshot;h=cf4a9d70c9ac24dd7196995390171150e4e56451;sf=tgz >> > > Is the URL created by a "git" com

Re: [Math] About cancelling the vote because of "Scipy" (Was: [CANCEL][VOTE][RC1] ..)

Le 19/12/2014 15:45, Gilles a écrit : > Hi. > > On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:19:09 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> [...] >>> >>> This vote will close in 72 hours, at 2014-12-21T23:15:00Z (this is UTC >>> time). >> >> This vote is canceled in order to clean out both LICENSE and NOTICE >> files. >> >> Sev

Re: [math] Improved release documentation with a direct URL for tag in vote email.

On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:16:05 + (UTC), l...@apache.org wrote: [...] +Tag URL: + https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-math.git;a=snapshot;h=cf4a9d70c9ac24dd7196995390171150e4e56451;sf=tgz Is the URL created by a "git" command? It would be useful to add it in the "howto". Thanks

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:09 AM, sebb wrote: > > On 19 December 2014 at 09:17, Thomas Neidhart > wrote: > > Hi Luc, > > > > tested the artifacts with java version "1.7.0_71". > > Everything looks good, great work. > > > > +1 > > > > @missing revision in vote mail: > > > > from my POV this is rea

[Math] About cancelling the vote because of "Scipy" (Was: [CANCEL][VOTE][RC1] ..)

Hi. On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:19:09 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: [...] This vote will close in 72 hours, at 2014-12-21T23:15:00Z (this is UTC time). This vote is canceled in order to clean out both LICENSE and NOTICE files. Several attributions were in NOTICE that should not be there, but a

Re: Commons RDF

Hi Sergio On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > Hi, > > On 18/12/14 13:43, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > >> We had a similar proposal a while ago [1]. Is the Clerezza RDF library >> related to this proposal? In the end the people around >> https://github.com/commons-rdf/commons

[CANCEL][VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4

Le 19/12/2014 00:19, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.4. > > Note that since [math] now uses git, access to the tag is slightly > different from other components. To clone a fresh tag, run this command > (beware I have split it in 2 lines below): > >

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4

On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 07:55:13 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote: On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:50 PM, sebb wrote: On 18 December 2014 at 23:19, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.4. > > Note that since [math] now uses git, access to the tag is slightly > differen

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4

Le 19/12/2014 13:51, Gary Gregory a écrit : > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> >> Le 19/12/2014 03:25, Gary Gregory a écrit : >>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:14 PM, sebb wrote: If it's not done properly, why bother with a VOTE at all? >>> >>> I'm with Sebb her

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:50 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 18 December 2014 at 23:19, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.4. > > > > Note that since [math] now uses git, access to the tag is slightly > > different from other components. To clone a fresh tag, run

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > > Le 19/12/2014 03:25, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:14 PM, sebb wrote: > >> > >> If it's not done properly, why bother with a VOTE at all? > >> > > > > I'm with Sebb here. Yes, our release process is a PITA, but what

Re: Commons RDF

Hi, On 18/12/14 13:43, Benedikt Ritter wrote: We had a similar proposal a while ago [1]. Is the Clerezza RDF library related to this proposal? In the end the people around https://github.com/commons-rdf/commons-rdf decided not to bring their code to Apache Commons, because they wanted to use git

Re: [Math] Relase howto (Was: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4)

Le 19/12/2014 12:02, Gilles a écrit : > Hello. > >> >> [...] I have modified the instructions in our [math] release howto. I >> will copy this howto to the wiki as soon as I get write access on it. >> > > But I hope that the "master" version will be the one within > the repository (with a pointer

[Math] Relase howto (Was: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4)

Hello. [...] I have modified the instructions in our [math] release howto. I will copy this howto to the wiki as soon as I get write access on it. But I hope that the "master" version will be the one within the repository (with a pointer to it from the Wiki is you like) because instructions

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4

On 19 December 2014 at 10:36, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > Le 19/12/2014 11:17, sebb a écrit : >> On 19 December 2014 at 06:02, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> Le 19/12/2014 03:25, Gary Gregory a écrit : On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:14 PM, sebb wrote: > > If it's not done properly, why

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4

Hi Sebb, Le 19/12/2014 11:17, sebb a écrit : > On 19 December 2014 at 06:02, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Le 19/12/2014 03:25, Gary Gregory a écrit : >>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:14 PM, sebb wrote: If it's not done properly, why bother with a VOTE at all? >>> >>> I'm with Sebb here. Y

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4

On 19 December 2014 at 06:02, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 19/12/2014 03:25, Gary Gregory a écrit : >> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:14 PM, sebb wrote: >>> >>> If it's not done properly, why bother with a VOTE at all? >>> >> >> I'm with Sebb here. Yes, our release process is a PITA, but what Sebb is >>

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4

On 19 December 2014 at 09:17, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi Luc, > > tested the artifacts with java version "1.7.0_71". > Everything looks good, great work. > > +1 > > @missing revision in vote mail: > > from my POV this is really just convenience for the reviewers as *any* > commit to a branch will

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4

Hi Luc, tested the artifacts with java version "1.7.0_71". Everything looks good, great work. +1 @missing revision in vote mail: from my POV this is really just convenience for the reviewers as *any* commit to a branch will be spotted and questioned anyway. @NOTICE file: I fail to understand

Re: Commons RDF

Hi Andy On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > I am rather surprised by the approach here. > > There are several RDF-related projects - Jena, Marmotta, Any23, Stanbol, > Clerezza and other that use RDF. > > How do they fit in? > > reto wrote: > >> Following the recent announc