On 19/12/14 08:58, Reto Gmür wrote:
Apart from yours all reactions on the clerezza mailing lists where positive
including the one from a contributor to the github-commons project.
I'm sorry you feel that way - it was not my intention. With my first
email [1] was intended to be positive and highlight linkage for
collaboration. Community over code.
My second email was technical discussion in reply to your technical points.
[1]
[[
The system you referenced is now at:
https://github.com/commons-rdf/commons-rdf
and I hope you'll consider it for Clerezza.
Andy
]]
got several +1's in the thread after that.
You replied [2] quoting the Clerezza charter and made some technical
claims about commons-rdf:
[[
- It adds things that are not in the API and make it less general
purpose, like adding blank node identifiers from concrete syntaxes
]]
I replied asking about "vendor specific additions" (there is no record
of what this applies to) and addressing 2 of your technical points by
quoting the javadoc in commons-rdf/commons-rdf on the point above which
state somethgin somewhat different to your point.
Andy
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/clerezza-dev/201412.mbox/%3C5491AB06.9030601%40apache.org%3E
[2]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/clerezza-dev/201412.mbox/%3ccalvhuextrf51qsoocclkvgp2kbfyj5aumhzp3ygf8nvbtic...@mail.gmail.com%3E
PS before importing code, see SANDBOX-479
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
