On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:16 AM, wrote:
> Author: sebb
> Date: Tue Sep 6 15:16:47 2011
> New Revision: 1165701
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1165701&view=rev
> Log:
> LANG-744 StringUtils throws java.security.AccessControlException on Google
> App Engine
> Change static code to catch
+1 :)
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:42 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 7 September 2011 19:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Hi All:
>> >
>> > The message for the exception thrown by Validate.isInstance does not
>> mention
>> > the actual type, only the expe
Hi,
this question was raised while working on MATH-659, which I quote
{quote}
In rev1166533, I removed the call to this method in
AdamsNordsieckTransformer.initializeHighOrderDerivatives(double,
double[], double[][], double[][]). This raises one important question.
All across the package o.a.c.m.od
LU is theoretically lower if you have a faster matrix multiply.
Otherwise it is about 2n^3/3 + n^2 + n/3, I think.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
> I thought that QR is of O(n^3) complexity, while LU is probably in the
> vicinity of O(n^2.5). While this is not a barn bur
On 9/7/11 11:20 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
> 2011/9/7 Phil Steitz :
>> On 9/6/11 8:58 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
>>> 2011/9/6 Phil Steitz :
On 9/6/11 12:00 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
> 2011/9/5 Phil Steitz :
>> I have a couple of proposals for this class:
>>
>
I thought that QR is of O(n^3) complexity, while LU is probably in the
vicinity of O(n^2.5). While this is not a barn burning improvement, it is an
improvement. Consider that if you are using the covariance of the parameters
in deciding how to make the next step (some kind of inverse hessian rule),
vfs has a distribution management definition if you want to look at it. I'm
not sure how it would know where to publish to without it.
Ralph
On Sep 7, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> This may be a dump question, but I have trouble with deploying the site for
> configuration.
>
> Acco
It shouldn't be all that different from QR (at most about 2x different).
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
> It is also my recollection that LU is very quick to calculate. Would it be
> possible to allow users to choose?
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Ted Dunning wrote
Hi Oliver!
AFAIK mvn site:deploy has effect only once ran site:site, so the right
way to publish a site is
mvn site:site site:deploy
I used to run the shortcut
mvn site-deploy
At least is how it worked for sites I deployed.
HTH, alles gute!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
It is also my recollection that LU is very quick to calculate. Would it be
possible to allow users to choose?
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Does the LUDecomposition not use pivots? LU should always do so since it
> is
> numerically unstable otherwise. I would be surprise
This may be a dump question, but I have trouble with deploying the site
for configuration.
According to [1] a mvn site:deploy should be sufficient to do the job.
However, maven complains that there are no site information in the
distribution management element.
Well, this is true for the pom
Does the LUDecomposition not use pivots? LU should always do so since it is
numerically unstable otherwise. I would be surprised if it doesn't given
the normal level of quality in commons math.
QR is, of course, almost always preferable to LU as you note. But I would
be surprised at radically d
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 7 September 2011 19:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > The message for the exception thrown by Validate.isInstance does not
> mention
> > the actual type, only the expected type.
> >
> > Is there any objection to changing this?
> >
> > tr
On 7 September 2011 19:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> The message for the exception thrown by Validate.isInstance does not mention
> the actual type, only the expected type.
>
> Is there any objection to changing this?
>
> trunk: "The validated object is not an instance of %s"
>
> Proposal
Hi All:
The message for the exception thrown by Validate.isInstance does not mention
the actual type, only the expected type.
Is there any objection to changing this?
trunk: "The validated object is not an instance of %s"
Proposal (1): "The validated object is expected to be an instance of %s,
2011/9/7 Phil Steitz :
> On 9/6/11 8:58 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
>> 2011/9/6 Phil Steitz :
>>> On 9/6/11 12:00 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
2011/9/5 Phil Steitz :
> I have a couple of proposals for this class:
>
> 0) Merge the interface and impl. This is consistent wi
This vote has passed with binding +1 votes by the following people:
Simone Tripodi
Gary Gregory
Phil Steitz
(and my implicit +1 vote. There were no other votes.)
Thanks to all who voted and gave feedback. I will start with the release
procedure soon.
Oliver
Am 04.09.2011 21:40, schrieb Oliv
On 9/6/11 8:58 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
> 2011/9/6 Phil Steitz :
>> On 9/6/11 12:00 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
>>> 2011/9/5 Phil Steitz :
I have a couple of proposals for this class:
0) Merge the interface and impl. This is consistent with what we
are doing in so
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:28 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 7 September 2011 16:18, wrote:
> > Author: ggregory
> > Date: Wed Sep 7 15:18:43 2011
> > New Revision: 1166221
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1166221&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Convert to JUnit 4 from 3.
> >
> > Modified:
> >
>
> c
You are absolutely correct. My bad. Reverting...
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
> Greg,
>
> can you revert this? These wrapper methods are completely superfluous, it
> is
> already done by the compiler!
>
> - Jörg
>
> --- Weitergeleitete Nachricht (Anfang)
>
> B
Greg,
can you revert this? These wrapper methods are completely superfluous, it is
already done by the compiler!
- Jörg
--- Weitergeleitete Nachricht (Anfang)
Betreff: svn commit: r1166233 - in /commons/proper/lang/trunk/src:
main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/reflect/MethodUtils.
On 7 September 2011 16:18, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Wed Sep 7 15:18:43 2011
> New Revision: 1166221
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1166221&view=rev
> Log:
> Convert to JUnit 4 from 3.
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/refle
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
> group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
> branch 2.0[1] to experiment updates and study improvements in order to
> push a next
Hi.
> >>>
> >>>In class "AbstractLeastSquaresOptimizer" (in
> >>>"o.a.c.m.optimization.general"),
> >>>the method "getCovariances()" uses "LUDecompositionImpl" to compute the
> >>>inverse of a matrix.
> >>>In my application, this leads to a "SingularMatrixException". If I change
> >>>"LUDecomposi
On 7 September 2011 14:24, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:45 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 7 September 2011 13:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Should LockableFileWriter.close() be changed from:
>> >
>> > public void close() throws IOException {
>> > try {
>> > out.clo
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:45 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 7 September 2011 13:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Should LockableFileWriter.close() be changed from:
> >
> >public void close() throws IOException {
> >try {
> >out.close();
> >} finally {
> >lockFile.dele
Hi Gilles,
Le 07/09/2011 15:05, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 02:46:59PM +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 07/09/2011 12:45, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
Hello.
In class "AbstractLeastSquaresOptimizer" (in "o.a.c.m.optimization.general"),
the method "getCovariances()" uses "LUDe
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 02:46:59PM +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 07/09/2011 12:45, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> >Hello.
> >
> >In class "AbstractLeastSquaresOptimizer" (in "o.a.c.m.optimization.general"),
> >the method "getCovariances()" uses "LUDecompositionImpl" to compute the
> >inverse of a m
Le 07/09/2011 14:46, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 01:16:03PM +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 07/09/2011 12:49, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:39:37AM +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 07/09/2011 11:34, er...@apache.org wrote:
Author: erans
Date: Wed Sep 7 10:3
On 7 September 2011 13:46, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 01:16:03PM +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 07/09/2011 12:49, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:39:37AM +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> >> On 07/09/2011 11:34, er...@apache.org wrote:
>> >>> Author: erans
Le 07/09/2011 12:45, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
Hello.
In class "AbstractLeastSquaresOptimizer" (in "o.a.c.m.optimization.general"),
the method "getCovariances()" uses "LUDecompositionImpl" to compute the
inverse of a matrix.
In my application, this leads to a "SingularMatrixException". If I chan
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 01:16:03PM +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/09/2011 12:49, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:39:37AM +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >> On 07/09/2011 11:34, er...@apache.org wrote:
> >>> Author: erans
> >>> Date: Wed Sep 7 10:34:49 2011
> >>> New Revision:
On 7 September 2011 13:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Should LockableFileWriter.close() be changed from:
>
> public void close() throws IOException {
> try {
> out.close();
> } finally {
> lockFile.delete();
> }
>
> to:
>
> public boolean close() throws
Should LockableFileWriter.close() be changed from:
public void close() throws IOException {
try {
out.close();
} finally {
lockFile.delete();
}
to:
public boolean close() throws IOException {
try {
out.close();
}
+1 on putting Clirr in the parent
+0 on dropping idea plugin
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:38 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 7 September 2011 11:07, sebb wrote:
>> On 7 September 2011 06:10, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at
On 07/09/2011 12:49, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:39:37AM +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 07/09/2011 11:34, er...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: erans
>>> Date: Wed Sep 7 10:34:49 2011
>>> New Revision: 1166099
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1166099&view=rev
>>
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:39:37AM +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/09/2011 11:34, er...@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: erans
> > Date: Wed Sep 7 10:34:49 2011
> > New Revision: 1166099
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1166099&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Added "final".
> > Moved declaratio
On 7 September 2011 12:07, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:22:24AM +0100, sebb wrote:
>> On 7 September 2011 10:46, Gilles Sadowski
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 12:42:06AM +0100, sebb wrote:
>> >> On 7 September 2011 00:04, Gilles Sadowski
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hel
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:22:24AM +0100, sebb wrote:
> On 7 September 2011 10:46, Gilles Sadowski
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 12:42:06AM +0100, sebb wrote:
> >> On 7 September 2011 00:04, Gilles Sadowski
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hello.
> >> >
> >> >> Modified:
> >> >> commons/proper/math/t
Hello.
In class "AbstractLeastSquaresOptimizer" (in "o.a.c.m.optimization.general"),
the method "getCovariances()" uses "LUDecompositionImpl" to compute the
inverse of a matrix.
In my application, this leads to a "SingularMatrixException". If I change
"LUDecompositionImpl" to "QRDecompositionImpl"
On 07/09/2011 11:34, er...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: erans
> Date: Wed Sep 7 10:34:49 2011
> New Revision: 1166099
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1166099&view=rev
> Log:
> Added "final".
> Moved declaration of "sum" where it is used.
You might want to re-consider that. I suspect sum
On 7 September 2011 11:07, sebb wrote:
> On 7 September 2011 06:10, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Ralph Goers
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Why is the idea plugin defined? IntelliJ hasn't needed it in a long time.
>>>
>>
>> Good question.
>>
>> Should we get rid of it?
>>
>
> OK by
+1
Sent from tablet device. Please excuse typos and brevity.
On Sep 7, 2011 4:27 AM, "Simone Tripodi" wrote:
> Hi all,
> just to remind that vote closes on Thu 8 Sept on 3:13 PM GMT, please
> cast your votes! :)
> Many thanks in advance, all the best!
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonet
On 7 September 2011 10:46, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 12:42:06AM +0100, sebb wrote:
>> On 7 September 2011 00:04, Gilles Sadowski
>> wrote:
>> > Hello.
>> >
>> >> Modified:
>> >> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/util/FastMath.java
>> >> URL:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 7 September 2011 06:10, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>
>> Why is the idea plugin defined? IntelliJ hasn't needed it in a long time.
>>
>
> Good question.
>
> Should we get rid of it?
>
OK by me; never used it.
> The warning at the start of all
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 12:42:06AM +0100, sebb wrote:
> On 7 September 2011 00:04, Gilles Sadowski
> wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> >> Modified:
> >> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/util/FastMath.java
> >> URL:
> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/math/trunk
I would introduce getArrayRef(), which makes clear what exactly happen.
It is after all the same like spares/dense discussion ...
Arne
Am Mittwoch, den 07.09.2011, 08:11 +0200 schrieb Sébastien Brisard:
> In fact, getArrayRef does not belong to the RealVector class. It is
> only defined in Array
Hi all,
just to remind that vote closes on Thu 8 Sept on 3:13 PM GMT, please
cast your votes! :)
Many thanks in advance, all the best!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Jochen!
> we still haven't beca
Le 07/09/2011 08:27, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
True enough.
Maybe the use of one those two could be strongly discouraged.
I personally was puzzled the first time I saw those two methods. I was
even wondering wether one of them would not return a shallow copy
(when possible), while the other wou
Le 07/09/2011 04:16, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
I don't think MATH-653 has been marked as resolved...
You can do so, you should have proper karma.
Luc
2011/9/6 Gilles Sadowski:
[...]
Also, when
opening a new ticket, should it be assigned to someone, if this person
agrees to take care o
51 matches
Mail list logo
