On 7 September 2011 19:26, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All: > > The message for the exception thrown by Validate.isInstance does not mention > the actual type, only the expected type. > > Is there any objection to changing this? > > trunk: "The validated object is not an instance of %s" > > Proposal (1): "The validated object is expected to be an instance of %s, not > a %s" > > Or more succinctly (2): "Expected an instance of %s, got a %" > > Or more succinctly (3), a la JUnit: "Expected: %s, actual: %" > > Thoughts?
(3) seems fine. > Gary > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: http://s.apache.org/rl > Spring Batch in Action: http://s.apache.org/HOq > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
