Hi All: The message for the exception thrown by Validate.isInstance does not mention the actual type, only the expected type.
Is there any objection to changing this? trunk: "The validated object is not an instance of %s" Proposal (1): "The validated object is expected to be an instance of %s, not a %s" Or more succinctly (2): "Expected an instance of %s, got a %" Or more succinctly (3), a la JUnit: "Expected: %s, actual: %" Thoughts? Gary -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: http://s.apache.org/rl Spring Batch in Action: http://s.apache.org/HOq Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
