[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[OGNL] help! a lot of test failures with JUnit4 :(

Hi all guys, please help me, there's the need of a volunteer with fresh mind that could review patch attached to OGNL-9. I put too much effort on refactoring that I can't see where the error is. I hope Gary can help us since IIUC he's our JUnit guru!!! Now off to bed, it's 1:00am :P Have a nice WE,

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 07:42:45PM +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 14/05/2011 17:54, Phil Steitz a écrit : > >On 5/14/11 8:31 AM, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > >>Phil, > >> > >>>Sorry, Dmitri, but that is not an acceptable "veto" from the ASF > >>>perspective. When you say "-1" to a technical (code-r

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

Luc, Dimitri, I don't think you are really speaking about exception repackaging, you pointed it out only has an example of endless discussions, among others. right, it was just an example. I change to +1 because I have not technical point against its inclusion. I nevertheless expect a better

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

Le 14/05/2011 21:04, Phil Steitz a écrit : On 5/14/11 10:57 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 14/05/2011 16:03, Phil Steitz a écrit : On 5/14/11 2:08 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hello, Some weeks ago, I have imported in the sandbox a new component, Apache Commons BSP which implements Binary Partitioni

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

On 5/14/11 10:57 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 14/05/2011 16:03, Phil Steitz a écrit : >> On 5/14/11 2:08 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Some weeks ago, I have imported in the sandbox a new component, >>> Apache Commons BSP which implements Binary Partitioning Trees (see >>> the thread

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

Le 14/05/2011 16:03, Phil Steitz a écrit : On 5/14/11 2:08 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hello, Some weeks ago, I have imported in the sandbox a new component, Apache Commons BSP which implements Binary Partitioning Trees (see the thread about this creation here:

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

Dmitry, this might be helpful: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html The goal with Apache voting is not usually a simple majority, but rather full consensus where abstentions are counted as acceptance. Your -1 vote derails the consensus, but appears to have been made for non-technical rea

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

Le 14/05/2011 17:54, Phil Steitz a écrit : On 5/14/11 8:31 AM, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: Phil, Sorry, Dmitri, but that is not an acceptable "veto" from the ASF perspective. When you say "-1" to a technical (code-related) change, you need to provide a technical reason to support your veto. Do y

Re: svn commit: r1103145 - /commons/proper/net/trunk/pom.xml

On 5/14/11 9:09 AM, s...@apache.org wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Sat May 14 16:09:22 2011 > New Revision: 1103145 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1103145&view=rev > Log: > Archives for 3.0 were created with -bin suffix (so add -bin not bin!) huh? Can you explain what is going on here?

Re: [ALL] Binary archives without -bin incompatible with latest assembly plugin

On 14 May 2011 17:03, sebb wrote: > The assembly descriptor id (e.g. src) is automatically > appended to the name of the archives created by the assembly plugin. > > Up until version 2.2-beta-4 of the plugin, the tag was allowed to > be empty, but with 2.2 this changed [1] - the id must now be >

[ALL] Binary archives without -bin incompatible with latest assembly plugin

The assembly descriptor id (e.g. src) is automatically appended to the name of the archives created by the assembly plugin. Up until version 2.2-beta-4 of the plugin, the tag was allowed to be empty, but with 2.2 this changed [1] - the id must now be not-empty. This means that for example the bin

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

On 5/14/11 8:31 AM, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > Phil, > >> Sorry, Dmitri, but that is not an acceptable "veto" from the ASF >> perspective. When you say "-1" to a technical (code-related) >> change, you need to provide a technical reason to support your >> veto. Do you have technical problems with

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

Phil, Sorry, Dmitri, but that is not an acceptable "veto" from the ASF perspective. When you say "-1" to a technical (code-related) change, you need to provide a technical reason to support your veto. Do you have technical problems with the code being proposed for inclusion? In a strict demo

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

On 5/14/11 7:28 AM, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > Luc, > >> package. So the component could be promoted and it really makes >> sense >> to have it inside [math]. > > Over the past several months, I read endless discussions regarding > some > 'philosophical' questions (e.g. on exceptions) affecting > co

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

Luc, package. So the component could be promoted and it really makes sense to have it inside [math]. Over the past several months, I read endless discussions regarding some 'philosophical' questions (e.g. on exceptions) affecting commons-math, all delaying the relaese of 2.2. Unless one first

Re: [OGNL] code style

I see, that's great, thanks!!! :) I'm in the middle of the process of migrating the tests to junit4, so if you have spare time to dedicate to OGNL feel free to re-enable the checkstyle config! Thanks a lot!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, May 14, 2

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

On 5/14/11 2:08 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hello, > > Some weeks ago, I have imported in the sandbox a new component, > Apache Commons BSP which implements Binary Partitioning Trees (see > the thread about this creation here: > ). > > Thinking further ab

Re: [OGNL] code style

they are bundled with the checkstyle plugin (see [1] ) So nothing to do except pom configuration :-) /Olivier [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-checkstyle-plugin/src/main/resources/config/ 2011/5/14 Simone Tripodi : > Merci Olivier!! > I didn't find where config/mav

Re: [OGNL] code style

Merci Olivier!! I didn't find where config/maven_checks.xml is! Can you help me please? Feel free to commit yourself! And thanks!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Check the pom here > http://svn.apach

Re: [OGNL] code style

Check the pom here http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml De rien ! :-) 2011/5/14 Simone Tripodi : > Great! can you point me please to an already existing configuration? I > guess in Maven core I should find something, no? > Merci en avant! > Simo > > http://people.apache.o

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

I'm +1 on this, a major release with new features sounds very nice! Have a nice WE, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hello, > > Some weeks ago, I have imported in the sandbox a new component, Apache >

Re: [OGNL] code style

Great! can you point me please to an already existing configuration? I guess in Maven core I should find something, no? Merci en avant! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > +1 > Checkstyle configuration wil

Re: [OGNL] code style

+1 Checkstyle configuration will need update -- Olivier Le 14 mai 2011 12:10, "Simone Tripodi" a écrit : > Hi all guys, > OGNL code is formatted using a mixture of various styles, I hope > everybody agrees on adopting one unique style. > I propose to adopt the Maven Style[1] that is already wid

[OGNL] code style

Hi all guys, OGNL code is formatted using a mixture of various styles, I hope everybody agrees on adopting one unique style. I propose to adopt the Maven Style[1] that is already widely adopted and supported by IDEs. Thoughts? Objections? If agree I would quickly proceed, just let me know! SImo [1

Re: svn commit: r1102928 - /incubator/ognl/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/OgnlContext.java

indeed, thanks for reviewing! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 2:29 AM, sebb wrote: > On 14 May 2011 00:55,   wrote: >> Author: simonetripodi >> Date: Fri May 13 23:55:05 2011 >> New Revision: 1102928 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/

Re: [pool] numActive

Phil Steitz wrote: >I see this now in GOP javadoc for numActive. > > * The combined count of the currently active objects and those in the > * process of being created. Under load, it may exceed {@link >#_maxActive} > * but there will never be more than {@link #_maxActive} created >at any

[math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

Hello, Some weeks ago, I have imported in the sandbox a new component, Apache Commons BSP which implements Binary Partitioning Trees (see the thread about this creation here: ). Thinking further about it, I would like to directly merge it into [ma