Hi all,
sorry I'm late due to my local timezone :S I'm currently working to
humorize the Java6 compiler, I hope to fix the compilation problems
ASAP.
About the Ant build, on [digester] too we decided to drop Ant in favor
of Maven build only, I don't know if it could help on taking a
decision.
Have
> -Original Message-
> From: jodastep...@gmail.com [mailto:jodastep...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Stephen Colebourne
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 17:09
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: Weird class names [WAS RE: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on
> RC3]
>
> On 12 October
> -Original Message-
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 16:30
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: Weird class names [WAS RE: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on
> RC3]
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Matt Benson wro
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> The more I think about it and read it, the more non-English and odd the word
> "filesystem" feels to me. I would never write: 'Do this or that with the
> filesystem.' It just sounds Dutch or German to me. That's what I get for
>
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=1062&projectId=98
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 12 Oct 2010 02:23:50 +
Finished at: Tue 12 Oct 2010 02:24:07 +
Total time: 16s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Buil
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=1061&projectId=98
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 12 Oct 2010 01:21:42 +
Finished at: Tue 12 Oct 2010 01:22:02 +
Total time: 20s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Buil
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=1060&projectId=98
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 12 Oct 2010 00:22:22 +
Finished at: Tue 12 Oct 2010 00:22:41 +
Total time: 19s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Buil
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Is there any reason why the FilesystemMonitor.run() method is not
> short-circuited ASAP? For example, by doing this:
Its more consistent - all observers get notified, rather than
(possibly) having only some that are and some not
On 12 October 2010 00:29, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Part of me thinks its a bit late in the day to raise this when its
> been in svn for 2+ years. But then again, if more people agree with
> Gary then I can cancel the release and rename them (I would probably
> opt for FileItem, FileObserver, FileM
Hi All:
Is there any reason why the FilesystemMonitor.run() method is not short-
circuited ASAP? For example, by doing this:
/**
* Run.
*/
public void run() {
while (running) {
for (FilesystemObserver observer : observers) {
observer.checkAndN
Please ignore, should have been tagged as [IO].
Please accept my apologies...
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Gregory [mailto:ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 17:00
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [POOL] FilesystemMonitor responsiveness
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Gregory [mailto:ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 17:00
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [POOL] FilesystemMonitor responsiveness
>
> Hi All:
>
> Is there any reason why the FilesystemMonitor.run() method is not short-
Hi All:
Is there any reason why the FilesystemMonitor.run() method is not
short-circuited ASAP? For example, by doing this:
/**
* Run.
*/
public void run() {
while (running) {
for (FilesystemObserver observer : observers) {
observer.checkAndN
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 10/11/10 7:29 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 16:13
>>> To: Commons Developers List
>>> Subject: Re: [POOL] can the CheckedOb
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 16:42
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [POOL] can the CheckedObjectPool be removed when introducing
> Java5 generics?
>
> On 10/11/10 7:29 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> -
On 10/11/10 7:29 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 16:13
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [POOL] can the CheckedObjectPool be removed when introducing
Java5 generics?
On 10/11/10 6:40 PM, Gar
On 10/11/10 7:13 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
This is odd, I get:
Continuum is failing with the same issue:
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=1057&projectId=98
Niall
And I get the same compile failure under
On 10/10/10 10:59 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC4. The main change since RC4 was to
fix the Ant build
The RC3 changes were improvements to some tests which were causing
intermittent failures in Gump& Continuum and JavaDoc improvements.
For details about Continuum b
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 16:13
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [POOL] can the CheckedObjectPool be removed when introducing
> Java5 generics?
>
> On 10/11/10 6:40 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > This i
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 2010, at 11:49 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> Hi All:
>>
>> The more I think about it and read it, the more non-English and odd the word
>> "filesystem" feels to me. I would never write: 'Do this or that with the
>> filesystem.' It
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=1059&projectId=98
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 11 Oct 2010 23:23:12 +
Finished at: Mon 11 Oct 2010 23:23:27 +
Total time: 15s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Buil
> -Original Message-
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 16:16
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC4
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > I
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I see mismatch here:
>
> * @deprecated Use IOUtils. Will be removed in 2.0.
> * Methods renamed to IOUtils.write() or IOUtils.copy().
> * Null handling behaviour changed in IOUtils (null data does not
> * throw NullPointerEx
On 10/11/10 6:40 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
This is odd, I get:
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Compilation failure
\Users\ggregory\b\svn\apa
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> This is odd, I get:
Continuum is failing with the same issue:
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=1057&projectId=98
Niall
> [INFO]
>
> [E
Hi All:
I see mismatch here:
* @deprecated Use IOUtils. Will be removed in 2.0.
* Methods renamed to IOUtils.write() or IOUtils.copy().
* Null handling behaviour changed in IOUtils (null data does not
* throw NullPointerException).
*/
@Deprecated
public class CopyUtils {
Either the class
This is odd, I get:
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Compilation failure
\Users\ggregory\b\svn\apache.org\commons\pool\src\test\org\apache\co
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=1057&projectId=98
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Mon 11 Oct 2010 22:21:36 +
Finished at: Mon 11 Oct 2010 22:23:08 +
Total time: 1m 31s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
FYI: The source zip builds and tests pass with Ant 1.8.1 and Maven 2.2.1 on
Oracle/Sun Java 1.6.0_21 on Windows Vista Business N 64-bit.
Gary Gregory
Senior Software Engineer
Rocket Software
3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA
Tel: +1.404.760.1560
Email: ggreg...@seagullsoftw
Hi Phil, all interested,
I just committed r1021517 that contains the Generics feature, all tests pass:
Tests run: 256, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO] ---
Thanks for the support Phil!!! I'm going to terminate the work on
generics - the attached patch on the issue provided a small subset of
the whole feature - after that I already planned working on
deprecation stuff, I'm sure we can make the pool much easier.
Have a nice day, I'll keep you updated!
S
Maven and ant builds were successful with Java 1.4 and 1.6 on Windows 7.
The artifacts and the site look good.
I am missing the release notes. Having a RELEASENOTES.txt in the top
directory is more obvious than the changes report on the site. But this
is probably not a blocker.
So +1.
Olive
On Oct 11, 2010, at 11:49 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> The more I think about it and read it, the more non-English and odd the word
> "filesystem" feels to me. I would never write: 'Do this or that with the
> filesystem.' It just sounds Dutch or German to me. That's what I get for
>
About the JCI reference: Well, VFS was release with many "FileSystem" classes:
http://commons.apache.org/vfs/apidocs/org/apache/commons/vfs/FileSystem.html
Does that bring more weight to my argument? :)
Gary Gregory
Senior Software Engineer
Rocket Software
3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlant
Hi All:
The more I think about it and read it, the more non-English and odd the word
"filesystem" feels to me. I would never write: 'Do this or that with the
filesystem.' It just sounds Dutch or German to me. That's what I get for
working with Dutch people :)
I am not the guardian of the Engli
Yep. Good point, Matt. Thanks! Simo pls do continue to point out candidates
for deprecation / removal. I would personally like to see pool skinnied down a
little in 2.0, with some of the specialized pools introduced to workaround
problems in earlier impls removed.
On Oct 10, 2010, at 9:09
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> I am looking around and I notice set of class names that are IMO incorrectly
> camel-cased: Filesystem* should be FileSystem because "filesystem" is not a
> word in English.
Thats true but its often written as one - see wikipedia "A file sy
37 matches
Mail list logo
