Hi all, sorry I'm late due to my local timezone :S I'm currently working to humorize the Java6 compiler, I hope to fix the compilation problems ASAP. About the Ant build, on [digester] too we decided to drop Ant in favor of Maven build only, I don't know if it could help on taking a decision. Have a nice day, Simo
PS follow below my previous test: $ uname -a Darwin Simones-Computer-2.local 10.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.4.0: Fri Apr 23 18:28:53 PDT 2010; root:xnu-1504.7.4~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 $ java -version java version "1.5.0_24" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_24-b02-357-10M3065) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_24-149, mixed mode, sharing) $ mvn -version Apache Maven 3.0 (r1004208; 2010-10-04 13:50:56+0200) Java version: 1.5.0_24 Java home: /XXX/1.5.0/Home Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: MacRoman OS name: "mac os x" version: "10.6.4" arch: "i386" Family: "unix" $ mvn test ... Tests run: 256, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 10/11/10 7:29 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com] >>>> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 16:13 >>>> To: Commons Developers List >>>> Subject: Re: [POOL] can the CheckedObjectPool be removed when introducing >>>> Java5 generics? >>>> >>>> On 10/11/10 6:40 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This is odd, I get: >>>>> >>>>> [INFO] >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE >>>>> [INFO] >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> [INFO] Compilation failure >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> \Users\ggregory\b\svn\apache.org\commons\pool\src\test\org\apache\commons\pool >>>> \TestPoolUtils.java:[496,21] reference to prefill is ambiguous, both >>>> method<K,V>prefill(org.apac >>>>> >>>>> he.commons.pool.KeyedObjectPool<K,V>,K,int) in >>>> >>>> org.apache.commons.pool.PoolUtils and >>>> >>>> method<K,V>prefill(org.apache.commons.pool.KeyedObjectPool<K,V>,java.util.Coll >>>> ection<K>,i >>>>> >>>>> nt) in org.apache.commons.pool.PoolUtils match >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> \Users\ggregory\b\svn\apache.org\commons\pool\src\test\org\apache\commons\pool >>>> \TestPoolUtils.java:[506,17] reference to prefill is ambiguous, both >>>> method<K,V>prefill(org.apac >>>>> >>>>> he.commons.pool.KeyedObjectPool<K,V>,K,int) in >>>> >>>> org.apache.commons.pool.PoolUtils and >>>> >>>> method<K,V>prefill(org.apache.commons.pool.KeyedObjectPool<K,V>,java.util.Coll >>>> ection<K>,i >>>>> >>>>> nt) in org.apache.commons.pool.PoolUtils match >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> \Users\ggregory\b\svn\apache.org\commons\pool\src\test\org\apache\commons\pool >>>> \TestPoolUtils.java:[514,17] reference to prefill is ambiguous, both >>>> method<K,V>prefill(org.apac >>>>> >>>>> he.commons.pool.KeyedObjectPool<K,V>,K,int) in >>>> >>>> org.apache.commons.pool.PoolUtils and >>>> >>>> method<K,V>prefill(org.apache.commons.pool.KeyedObjectPool<K,V>,java.util.Coll >>>> ection<K>,i >>>>> >>>>> nt) in org.apache.commons.pool.PoolUtils match >>>>> >>>>> I am using Maven 2.2.1 with Oracle Java 1.6.0_21 on Windows Vista 64 >>>>> bit. >>>>> >>>>> Ant does not build because it expects a specific version of JUnit to be >>>>> in >>>> >>>> place, which makes me wish we either did: >>>>> >>>>> - Ant and JUnit to the same way [IO] does it. >>>>> - Remove the ant build. >>>> >>>> Thanks for patching the Ant build, Gary and thanks in advance for >>>> fixing this problem :) >>>> >>>> I would really like to keep the Ant build working. >>> >>> In SVN: I fixed up the Ant build to use Junit jar from M2 local >>> repository, the same way we do for IO. Which makes me wonder if we should >>> use Ivy for Ant builds? Ideally, we should pick Ant or Maven, maintaining >>> both it a pain. >>> >> >> A mild pain for us, but important for the many, many users who do not use >> Maven :) >> > > Why would anyone not use maven!!! ;) > > http://s.apache.org/m3blog > > ...joking aside though - if people are prepared to maintain the ant > builds (and I am for the components I work on) then no need to get rid > of them. > > Niall > > P.S. I only just found the Apache URL shortening service, which is cool: > > http://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/s_apache_org_uri_shortening > >> Phil >>> >>> Gary >>> >>>> >>>> Phil >>>>> >>>>> Gary >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Simone Tripodi [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] >>>>> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 14:44 >>>>> To: Commons Developers List >>>>> Subject: Re: [POOL] can the CheckedObjectPool be removed when >>>>> introducing >>>> >>>> Java5 generics? >>>>> >>>>> Hi Phil, all interested, >>>>> I just committed r1021517 that contains the Generics feature, all tests >>>> >>>> pass: >>>>> >>>>> Tests run: 256, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 >>>>> >>>>> [INFO] >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS >>>>> [INFO] >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> [INFO] Total time: 2:04.065s >>>>> [INFO] Finished at: Mon Oct 11 23:32:07 CEST 2010 >>>>> [INFO] Final Memory: 8M/508M >>>>> [INFO] >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> Please take a look/review if you have some spire time, after that, if >>>>> you agree, I'd like to start working on fixing/removing deprecations, >>>>> just let me know. >>>>> Thanks in advance, have a nice day, >>>>> Simo >>>>> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Simone Tripodi >>>>> <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the support Phil!!! I'm going to terminate the work on >>>>>> generics - the attached patch on the issue provided a small subset of >>>>>> the whole feature - after that I already planned working on >>>>>> deprecation stuff, I'm sure we can make the pool much easier. >>>>>> Have a nice day, I'll keep you updated! >>>>>> Simo >>>>>> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Phil Steitz<phil.ste...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yep. Good point, Matt. Thanks! Simo pls do continue to point out >>>> >>>> candidates for deprecation / removal. I would personally like to see >>>> pool >>>> skinnied down a little in 2.0, with some of the specialized pools >>>> introduced >>>> to workaround problems in earlier impls removed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Oct 10, 2010, at 9:09 PM, Simone Tripodi<simone.trip...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks for your feedback Matt, >>>>>>>> maybe I got blind because of the generics strong typing, but it would >>>>>>>> make sense in he scenario when an existing ObjectPool<?> instance >>>>>>>> doesn't expose the raw type. >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Simo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Matt Benson<gudnabr...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 10, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all pool team, >>>>>>>>>> I've been working on introducing generics in the pool on trunk, I >>>>>>>>>> noticed the CheckedObjectPool could lose its power when the pool >>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>> use the generics. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't work on [pool], but I would think that there would be a high >>>> >>>> likelihood of a pool's being configured e.g. by a dependency injection >>>> container, so IMO a checked pool is still relevant. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Matt >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So, can this class (and relative static methods) be removed from >>>>>>>>>> PoolUtils[1], or do you have suggestions why/how to maintain it? >>>>>>>>>> Many thanks in advance, have a nice day, >>>>>>>>>> Simo >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>> >>>> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/java/org/apache >>>> /commons/pool/PoolUtils.java >>>>>>>>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
