> -----Original Message----- > From: jodastep...@gmail.com [mailto:jodastep...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > Stephen Colebourne > Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 17:09 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: Weird class names [WAS RE: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on > RC3] > > On 12 October 2010 00:29, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Part of me thinks its a bit late in the day to raise this when its > > been in svn for 2+ years. But then again, if more people agree with > > Gary then I can cancel the release and rename them (I would probably > > opt for FileItem, FileObserver, FileMonitor rather than > > FileSystemItem, FileSystemObserver, FileSystemMonitor). > > I strongly recommend renaming in line with the JDK - > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/nio/javadoc/index.html > (assuming the classes are unreleased ATM) I do agree that it is > unfortunate to have an issue at this point. > > I would be happy with the shorter (non system) names too.
I just realized that [io] is not consistent with itself since it provides a class named FileSystemUtils (not FilesystemUtils). So [io] trunk has both naming conventions. Gary > > Stephen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
