Hi Phil, all interested, I just committed r1021517 that contains the Generics feature, all tests pass:
Tests run: 256, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Total time: 2:04.065s [INFO] Finished at: Mon Oct 11 23:32:07 CEST 2010 [INFO] Final Memory: 8M/508M [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please take a look/review if you have some spire time, after that, if you agree, I'd like to start working on fixing/removing deprecations, just let me know. Thanks in advance, have a nice day, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the support Phil!!! I'm going to terminate the work on > generics - the attached patch on the issue provided a small subset of > the whole feature - after that I already planned working on > deprecation stuff, I'm sure we can make the pool much easier. > Have a nice day, I'll keep you updated! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yep. Good point, Matt. Thanks! Simo pls do continue to point out candidates >> for deprecation / removal. I would personally like to see pool skinnied >> down a little in 2.0, with some of the specialized pools introduced to >> workaround problems in earlier impls removed. >> >> >> >> On Oct 10, 2010, at 9:09 PM, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for your feedback Matt, >>> maybe I got blind because of the generics strong typing, but it would >>> make sense in he scenario when an existing ObjectPool<?> instance >>> doesn't expose the raw type. >>> Thanks, >>> Simo >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Oct 10, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all pool team, >>>>> I've been working on introducing generics in the pool on trunk, I >>>>> noticed the CheckedObjectPool could lose its power when the pool will >>>>> use the generics. >>>> >>>> I don't work on [pool], but I would think that there would be a high >>>> likelihood of a pool's being configured e.g. by a dependency injection >>>> container, so IMO a checked pool is still relevant. >>>> >>>> -Matt >>>> >>>>> So, can this class (and relative static methods) be removed from >>>>> PoolUtils[1], or do you have suggestions why/how to maintain it? >>>>> Many thanks in advance, have a nice day, >>>>> Simo >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/PoolUtils.java >>>>> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
