Thanks a lot guys,
now the scope is much more clear to me. I'll proceed according to what
we agreed.
Have a nice day!!!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:22 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 31 August 2010 22:54, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Tue,
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration.
This is
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
On 31 August 2010 22:54, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> one more question: what about keeping or removing the Test
>> classes/methods that just declare the Suite? AFAIK are not more
>> needed...
>
>
> Don't have a strong opinion --
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> In the Lucene world, there is always a x.9 release that contains all
> deprecations for the upcoming release.
>
> It also generally maintains backward compatibility, but includes all new
> API's and may change semantics a bit, especially
> whe
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:12 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 31 August 2010 19:29, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi Seb,
>> thanks for your feedbacks, always appreciated! I know and understand
>> the need of having the package.html files, but what do you think about
>> replacing them with the package-info.java f
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi guys,
> one more question: what about keeping or removing the Test
> classes/methods that just declare the Suite? AFAIK are not more
> needed...
Don't have a strong opinion -- if someone wants to do it.
-Rahul
> Thanks in advance,
>
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:02 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 31 August 2010 14:39, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi Rahul,
>> I just added the xdoc version of the documentation present in the
>> package.html files.
>
Nice. BTW, you can even deploy the site if you mark the menu heading
as "Guide (SVN latest)"
Hi
I have a patch for the Sanselan project, and am interested in doing further
work on it, but the project seems dead:
* No SVN commits since 21 April 2010
* No answers to questions on user mailing list
* Developers seem busy with other things (
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@commons.apache.org/m
On 31 August 2010 19:29, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Seb,
> thanks for your feedbacks, always appreciated! I know and understand
> the need of having the package.html files, but what do you think about
> replacing them with the package-info.java files? It should be the
> same, or not? I've been wor
Hi guys,
one more question: what about keeping or removing the Test
classes/methods that just declare the Suite? AFAIK are not more
needed...
Thanks in advance,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Seb,
Hi Seb,
thanks for your feedbacks, always appreciated! I know and understand
the need of having the package.html files, but what do you think about
replacing them with the package-info.java files? It should be the
same, or not? I've been working with them and found it very
comfortables.
I'll start
In the Lucene world, there is always a x.9 release that contains all
deprecations for the upcoming release.
It also generally maintains backward compatibility, but includes all new
API's and may change semantics a bit, especially
where the old semantics were demonstrably wrong. This means that po
On 31 August 2010 17:02, sebb wrote:
> On 31 August 2010 14:39, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi Rahul,
>> I just added the xdoc version of the documentation present in the
>> package.html files.
>
> The package.html files are normally used to annotate the Javadoc output.
>
> However in this case thes
On 31 August 2010 14:39, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
> I just added the xdoc version of the documentation present in the
> package.html files.
The package.html files are normally used to annotate the Javadoc output.
However in this case these files have got a lot more content than is
norma
Gilles Sadowski wrote:
These deprecations should go in the 2.x branch. Version 2.2 will be
cut from the 2.x branch, so in order for users to see the
deprecation annotation, it needs to be there.
>>> I hesitated to leave the deprecation indication, the more so that the
>>> mentioned
> >> These deprecations should go in the 2.x branch. Version 2.2 will be
> >> cut from the 2.x branch, so in order for users to see the
> >> deprecation annotation, it needs to be there.
> >
> > I hesitated to leave the deprecation indication, the more so that the
> > mentioned "IterativeAlgorit
Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>> On 30 August 2010 04:18, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> The distribution zips/tars are here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-RC1/
>>>
>>> Maven artifacts are here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-RC1/maven/
>>>
>>> Site:
>>> http://peop
This VOTE is canceled. There is a problem with the jar manifest that
needs to be fixed.
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
sebb wrote:
> On 30 August 2010 04:18, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> The distribution zips/tars are here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-RC1/
>>
>> Maven artifacts are here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-RC1/maven/
>>
>> Site:
>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.
Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>>> Modified:
>>> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/ConvergingAlgorithm.java
>>> URL:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/ConvergingAlgorithm.java?rev=990792&r1=990791&r2=990792&view=
Hi Rahul,
I just added the xdoc version of the documentation present in the
package.html files. Do you think these last can be removed, since
would be redundant with the new developers guide? At this stage, we
should maintain two different data sources with same information, I'd
propose to drop the
> > Modified:
> > commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/ConvergingAlgorithm.java
> > URL:
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/ConvergingAlgorithm.java?rev=990792&r1=990791&r2=990792&view=diff
> > ==
On 31 August 2010 10:48, sebb wrote:
> On 30 August 2010 04:18, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> The distribution zips/tars are here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-RC1/
>>
>> Maven artifacts are here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-RC1/maven/
>>
>> Site:
>> http://people.a
On 30 August 2010 04:18, Phil Steitz wrote:
> The distribution zips/tars are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-RC1/
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-RC1/maven/
>
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-RC1/docs/
>
> Rele
27 matches
Mail list logo
