sebb wrote:
> On 30 August 2010 04:18, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The distribution zips/tars are here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-RC1/
>>
>> Maven artifacts are here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-RC1/maven/
>>
>> Site:
>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-RC1/docs/
>>
>> Release notes:
>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-RC1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>
> 
> I assume the SVN tag is here:
> 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_5_RC1/
> 
Yes, sorry.
> ===
> 
> There was a missing eol-style, which I have fixed in trunk.
> 
Thanks!

> Some minor issues.
> 
> The MANIFEST.MF files in the Maven artifacts contain the line:
>      Implementation-Vendor-Id: commons-pool
> which looks wrong. This ought to be fixed for the next iteration.
> 
Yes, this needs to be fixed.

> The <scm> entries in th POM point to trunk, rather than the tag.
> This is presumably because the release plugin was not used.
> 
Yes, and it is correct, IMO.

> NOTICE says "Copyright 1999-2010" whereas POM says
> "<inceptionYear>2001</inceptionYear>"
> If there is a good reason for the discrepancy it would be helpful to
> note this in the POM.
> 
I will look into this.  Could be the code originated in Tomcat, but
the commons component was born a year later. Assuming this is
correct, I am not sure where to note this.  Comment in the pom?

> Compiles and builds OK for me using Java 1.3/1.4/1.5/1.6 on Windows.
> 
Thanks!

> Issues with site docs:
> 
> There is no link for the 1.5.5 Javadoc in the menu. Could perhaps drop
> 1.5.4 in favour of 1.5.5
> 
I will do this post-release.

> downloads.html says:
> "Versions 1.3-1.5.2 depend at runtime only on a Java 1.3 or better JVM. "

Good catch.  I will fix this as well post-release.
> 
>> Votes, please.  This vote will close in 72 hours (2 Sept, 03:30 GMT).
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Phil
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------
>>
>> [ ] +1 Proceed with release
>> [ ] +0 OK, but...
>> [ ] -0 Would really like to see...
>> [ ] -1 I am not in favor of this release, because...
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to