Re: [VOTE] Release Math 2.0

Hi Luc, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Luc Maisonobe a écrit : >> Jörg Schaible a écrit : >>> Hi Phil, >>> >>> tried the source package with my compiler zoo. Sun JDKs and icedtea6 >>> take roughly 1 min to compile, test and build the jar. IBM JDK 1.6 takes >>> about 3 mins ... are math operations so bad

Re: [JEXL] source re-org to Maven2 standards?

Shooting for tomorrow on this. The changes shouldn't affect any working copies very much. -Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [JEXL] 2.0 JSR-223 initial implementation added - what next?

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 12:21 AM, sebb wrote: > On 01/08/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:42 PM, sebb wrote: >>  > On 31/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >>  >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:54 PM, sebb wrote: >>  >>  > Several items remain to be resolved: >>  >>  > >>  >>  > The

Re: [JEXL] source re-org to Maven2 standards?

On 01/08/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:08 PM, sebb wrote: > > Is that still planned? > > > > Might as well do it soon. Will move the Java source directories around > in an hour if I get a few minutes, else tomorrow. OK, I've finished changes for now. > -Rahul > >

Re: [JEXL] 2.0 JSR-223 initial implementation added - what next?

On 01/08/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:42 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 31/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:54 PM, sebb wrote: > >> > I've finished the implementation of a basic Jexl ScriptEngine for > JSR-223. > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >>

Re: [JEXL] source re-org to Maven2 standards?

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:08 PM, sebb wrote: > Is that still planned? > Might as well do it soon. Will move the Java source directories around in an hour if I get a few minutes, else tomorrow. -Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: d

Re: [JEXL] 2.0 JSR-223 initial implementation added - what next?

Just noticed -- it'd be great if you could add a package.html to the new scripting package you added. -Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.or

Re: [JEXL] 2.0 JSR-223 initial implementation added - what next?

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:47 PM, sebb wrote: > On 01/08/2009, sebb wrote: >> On 31/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >>  > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:54 PM, sebb wrote: >>  > >>  >  > N.B. This implementation is deliberately different from the one which >>  >  > is currently included in BSF 3.0 bina

Re: [JEXL] 2.0 JSR-223 initial implementation added - what next?

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:42 PM, sebb wrote: > On 31/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:54 PM, sebb wrote: >>  > I've finished the implementation of a basic Jexl ScriptEngine for JSR-223. >>  > >> >> >> >>  Cool, thanks. >> >>  mvn package failed for me (w/ Sun 1.6), comm

[JEXL] source re-org to Maven2 standards?

Is that still planned? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-compress-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-compress-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-lang3 (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-lang3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

Re: [JEXL] svn commit: r799492

On 31/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:24 PM, wrote: > > Author: sebb > > Date: Fri Jul 31 02:24:07 2009 > > New Revision: 799492 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=799492&view=rev > > Log: > > Initial implementation of Jexl Script engine and simple uni

Re: [JEXL] 2.0 JSR-223 initial implementation added - what next?

On 01/08/2009, sebb wrote: > On 31/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:54 PM, sebb wrote: > > > I've finished the implementation of a basic Jexl ScriptEngine for > JSR-223. > > > > > > > > > > > Cool, thanks. > > > > mvn package failed for me (w/ Sun 1.6),

Re: [JEXL] 2.0 JSR-223 initial implementation added - what next?

On 31/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:54 PM, sebb wrote: > > I've finished the implementation of a basic Jexl ScriptEngine for JSR-223. > > > > > > Cool, thanks. > > mvn package failed for me (w/ Sun 1.6), committed fix in r799750. Ah. However, I think the fix may

CANCELLED: [VOTE] Release Math 2.0

Phil Steitz wrote: The release distributions are here: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC3/ The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_0_RC3 Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours (01:00 GMT 2-Aug-09) Thanks! Phil

Re: [VOTE] Release Math 2.0

Luc Maisonobe a écrit : > Jörg Schaible a écrit : >> Hi Phil, >> >> tried the source package with my compiler zoo. Sun JDKs and icedtea6 take >> roughly 1 min to compile, test and build the jar. IBM JDK 1.6 takes about 3 >> mins ... are math operations so bad with this JVM? However, with JRockit >>

Re: [SCXML] Assign with the wildcard "*"

That works really fine. Thx a lot Rahul Mehdi Quoting Rahul Akolkar : On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Mehdi KENNANI wrote: Hi all I'm trying to use SCXML for a project (i have to realise an implementation of the MMI w3C spec). In my example, I want to assign the name of the event at a

Re: [VOTE] Release Math 2.0

Jörg Schaible a écrit : > Hi Phil, > > tried the source package with my compiler zoo. Sun JDKs and icedtea6 take > roughly 1 min to compile, test and build the jar. IBM JDK 1.6 takes about 3 > mins ... are math operations so bad with this JVM? However, with JRockit > 1.5 the test hangs forever in

Re: [JEXL] svn commit: r799492

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:24 PM, wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Fri Jul 31 02:24:07 2009 > New Revision: 799492 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=799492&view=rev > Log: > Initial implementation of Jexl Script engine and simple unit test > > Added: >     > commons/proper/jexl/branches/2.0/s

Re: [JEXL] svn commit: r799482

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:27 PM, wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Fri Jul 31 01:27:49 2009 > New Revision: 799482 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=799482&view=rev > Log: > The Jexl Script engine factory > > Added: >     > commons/proper/jexl/branches/2.0/src/java/org/apache/commons/jexl/scri

Re: [VOTE] Release Math 2.0

Hi Phil, tried the source package with my compiler zoo. Sun JDKs and icedtea6 take roughly 1 min to compile, test and build the jar. IBM JDK 1.6 takes about 3 mins ... are math operations so bad with this JVM? However, with JRockit 1.5 the test hangs forever in org.apache.commons.math.ode.nonstiff

Re: [SCXML] Assign with the wildcard "*"

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Mehdi KENNANI wrote: > Hi all > > I'm trying to use SCXML for a project (i have to realise an implementation > of the MMI w3C spec). > > In my example, I want to assign the name of the event at a var. > > Somethink like this : > > >     >       >     > > > Some

Re: [JEXL] 2.0 JSR-223 initial implementation added - what next?

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:54 PM, sebb wrote: > I've finished the implementation of a basic Jexl ScriptEngine for JSR-223. > Cool, thanks. mvn package failed for me (w/ Sun 1.6), committed fix in r799750. I'll take a look at the code itself in a few minutes. > Several items remain to be resol

Re: [compress] ar/cpio and last modfied times

Stefan Bodewig a écrit : I've started to implement a commons-compress based antlib over in Ant land Nice! Do you plan to replace the archive/compress tasks in Ant with the new ones? To make things even worse, cpio clai

[SCXML] Assign with the wildcard "*"

Hi all I'm trying to use SCXML for a project (i have to realise an implementation of the MMI w3C spec). In my example, I want to assign the name of the event at a var. Somethink like this : Somebody know how can i do this ? and is it possible to do this ? Mehdi --

Re: [VOTE] Release Math 2.0

On 31/07/2009, Oliver Heger wrote: > The artifacts look good, I found no specific problems. The user guide is > great work! > > The only thing I found a bit strange is the size of the binary > distribution: 16M is unusual for a small commons component. However, the > size is caused to the major p

[compress] ar/cpio and last modfied times

Hi, I've started to implement a commons-compress based antlib over in Ant land and just realized we don't have a common getLastModified() method in ArchiveEntry - maybe we should have. What seems to be worse is that we don't r

Re: [VOTE] Release Math 2.0

The artifacts look good, I found no specific problems. The user guide is great work! The only thing I found a bit strange is the size of the binary distribution: 16M is unusual for a small commons component. However, the size is caused to the major part by the API documentation and it should

Re: [VOTE] Release Math 2.0

On 31/07/2009, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Phil Steitz a écrit : > > > The release distributions are here: > > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC3/ SIgs and hashes OK; archives agree with each other and with SVN except as noted below. Builds and tests OK on Java 1.5/WinXP > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Math 2.0

Phil Steitz a écrit : > The release distributions are here: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC3/ > > The tag is here: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_0_RC3 It seems I forgot to put the Apache header in the unit tests for Mersenne twister. I'

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community integrat

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati