Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC2

2008-05-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 2:13 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 24/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:56 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:17 PM, s

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons Pipeline (Sandbox) - Build Def:

2008-05-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=92161&projectId=187 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Fri 23 May 2008 19:37:38 -0700 Finished at: Fri 23 May 2008 19:38:09 -0700 Total time: 31s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Nu

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons Compress (Sandbox) - Build Def:

2008-05-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=92155&projectId=176 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Fri 23 May 2008 19:31:37 -0700 Finished at: Fri 23 May 2008 19:32:06 -0700 Total time: 28s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Nu

Re: [vote][vfs] set minimum java version to 1.5

2008-05-23 Thread James Carman
Here's my vote. I still think we should come up with a standardized plan for when we change package names. There are different situations that we need to consider: 1. Jumping JDK/language versions. 2. API Incompatibility 3. Serialization incompatibility. [X] Go on with JDK 1.5 [ ] Go on wi

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC2

2008-05-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
btw +1 from me Niall On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The main changes since RC1 are that the ant build now works on JDK 1.3 > and the Logging dependency has been upgraded to the latest 1.1.1 > > The artifacts are here: > http://people.apache.org/~nial

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC2

2008-05-23 Thread sebb
On 24/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:56 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:17 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC2

2008-05-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:56 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:17 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:51 PM, s

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC2

2008-05-23 Thread sebb
On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:17 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:51 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton

Re: svn commit: r659211 - in /commons/proper/scxml/branches/J6: build.xml pom.xml project.xml

2008-05-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/22/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:12 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Author: rahul >> > Date: Thu May 22 12:12:16 2008 >> > New Revision: 659211 >> > >> > URL: htt

Re: [vote][vfs] set minimum java version to 1.5

2008-05-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
[X] Go on with JDK 1.5 Niall On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > Since it is not that easy to get in touch with a jdk 1.3 (or I tried not > hard enough ;-) ) I'd like to ask if everyone is fine to start VFS 2 with > jdk1.5? > > As long as no oth

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC2

2008-05-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:17 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:51 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Lu

Re: [vote][vfs] set minimum java version to 1.5

2008-05-23 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! It's easy enough to get 1.3 from java.sun.com ... I also got 1.2 and 1.1 from there recently. Ah, yes, now I found it too, it's in archive. Since the API might not drastically change it should not be required to rename the package to vfs5 or vfs2 or whatever. Not sure I understa

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons JCI - Build Def:

2008-05-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=92137&projectId=142 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Fri 23 May 2008 12:38:51 -0700 Finished at: Fri 23 May 2008 12:42:24 -0700 Total time: 3m 33s Build Trigger: Schedule Build

Re: [vote][vfs] set minimum java version to 1.5

2008-05-23 Thread sebb
On 23/05/2008, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > Since it is not that easy to get in touch with a jdk 1.3 (or I tried not > hard enough ;-) ) I'd like to ask if everyone is fine to start VFS 2 with > jdk1.5? > It's easy enough to get 1.3 from java.sun.com ... I also got 1.2 an

Re: [vote][vfs] set minimum java version to 1.5

2008-05-23 Thread Filip Defoort
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ X] Go on with JDK 1.5 > [ ] Go on with JDK 1.4 > [ ] Stick with JDK 1.3 for the following reason: > Cheers, - Filip - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI

[vote][vfs] set minimum java version to 1.5

2008-05-23 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! Since it is not that easy to get in touch with a jdk 1.3 (or I tried not hard enough ;-) ) I'd like to ask if everyone is fine to start VFS 2 with jdk1.5? As long as no other development need requires it to enhance the VFS 2 api I do not plan to introduce generics yet (I don't see that m

Re: svn commit: r659211 - in /commons/proper/scxml/branches/J6: build.xml pom.xml project.xml

2008-05-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 5/22/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:12 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Author: rahul > > Date: Thu May 22 12:12:16 2008 > > New Revision: 659211 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=659211&view=rev > > Log: > > Dependency eliminatio

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons VFS - Build Def:

2008-05-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=92134&projectId=171 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Fri 23 May 2008 11:41:53 -0700 Finished at: Fri 23 May 2008 11:42:43 -0700 Total time: 50s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Nu

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC2

2008-05-23 Thread sebb
On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:51 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Niall Pemberton a écri

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC2

2008-05-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:51 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Niall Pemberton a écrit : >> >> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC2

2008-05-23 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Niall Pemberton a écrit : > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Niall Pemberton a écrit : >>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A few comments on this release. Typo in the project description in the pom.

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC2

2008-05-23 Thread sebb
On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Niall Pemberton a écrit : > >> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> A few comments on this release. > >>> > >>> T

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC2

2008-05-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton a écrit : >> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> A few comments on this release. >>> >>> Typo in the project description in the pom.xml file: replace >>> "implmentat

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC2

2008-05-23 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Niall Pemberton a écrit : > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> A few comments on this release. >> >> Typo in the project description in the pom.xml file: replace >> "implmentation" with "implementation". >> >> Extracting files from the commons-chain-1.2-src

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC2

2008-05-23 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Niall Pemberton a écrit : We don't have a CommandListener - but for ChainListener there is a working example webapp, which I added a while ago to be able to test the changes for CHAIN-35 (ticket for example webapp is CHAIN-36) The other class was ChainServlet, not CommandListener, sorry. Yo