On 23/05/2008, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > Since it is not that easy to get in touch with a jdk 1.3 (or I tried not > hard enough ;-) ) I'd like to ask if everyone is fine to start VFS 2 with > jdk1.5? >
It's easy enough to get 1.3 from java.sun.com ... I also got 1.2 and 1.1 from there recently. > As long as no other development need requires it to enhance the VFS 2 api I > do not plan to introduce generics yet (I don't see that many places for this > in VFS), though sticking with jdk 1.3 seems uncool, no? ;-) > > Seriously, it should really be the right time to leave jdk 1.3 behind. OK. > Since the API might not drastically change it should not be required to > rename the package to vfs5 or vfs2 or whatever. Not sure I understand why the API needs to change at all. > If required, JDK 1.4 will do the trick too, though, this is EOL with > October 2008 too. > [ ] Go on with JDK 1.5 > [X] Go on with JDK 1.4 > [ ] Stick with JDK 1.3 for the following reason: > > Ciao, > Mario > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
