To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-net has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
On 04/03/2008, Jeffrey Brekke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm getting test failures, are they known issues?
>
> Tests in error:
>
> testInitial(org.apache.commons.net.telnet.TelnetClientTest)
>
> testOptionNegotiation(org.apache.commons.net.telnet.TelnetClientTest)
>
> testOptionRenegotiati
I'm getting test failures, are they known issues?
Tests in error:
testInitial(org.apache.commons.net.telnet.TelnetClientTest)
testOptionNegotiation(org.apache.commons.net.telnet.TelnetClientTest)
testOptionRenegotiation(org.apache.commons.net.telnet.TelnetClientTest)
testNotification(o
I have compiler errors:
/home/jbrekke/sandbox/other/net/src/test/org/apache/commons/net/tftp/TFTPTests.java:[33,8]
cannot find symbol
symbol : class TFTPServer
location: class org.apache.commons.net.tftp.TFTPTests
/home/jbrekke/sandbox/other/net/src/test/org/apache/commons/net/tftp/TFTPTests.jav
On 04/03/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 03/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Author: rwinston
> > Date: Mon Mar 3 06:39:51 2008
> > New Revision: 633102
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=633102&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Remove TFTPServer.java
On 03/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: rwinston
> Date: Mon Mar 3 06:39:51 2008
> New Revision: 633102
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=633102&view=rev
> Log:
> Remove TFTPServer.java and tftp/TFTPServerPathTests.java from 1.5 build
s/1.5/1.2/ ?
>
>
Grzegorz Błaszczyk writes:
> I would like to add two new static methods for handling camel scape and
> underscore separated strings to org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils
> class.
Imho, this would be better if we could specify a seperator. Certainly I
can think of cases where spaces and '-'s
Henri Yandell wrote:
Could you open a JIRA issue for the idea and attach a patch file?
I added it as:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-415
We're really close to releasing 2.4, so I'm not sure if it would go in
there or not. There was also a ticket about camel case in 2.4 that
you m
--- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:06 AM, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On the adding components to the sandbox bit
> that
> > > Matt raised; here are
> > > some I'd like to bring in
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:06 AM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On the adding components to the sandbox bit that
> > Matt raised; here are
> > some I'd like to bring in. It's stuff from osjava
> > that I haven't found
> > replaceme
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
On 03/03/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02/03/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > This is a release vote for Commons Net 2.0. This release is a major new
> > release with a huge number of changes and fixes. This release requires
> > JDK 1.5+.
> >
> >
On 03/03/2008, Oberhuber, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If TFTPServer is for testing only, shouldn't it reside in
> the tests/ source root?
Duh!
That should have been ITIR (I thought I remembered ;-)
Sorry for the noise.
> Having a TFTPServer would be cool though, but I have no idea
> wh
On 3/3/08, Oberhuber, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If TFTPServer is for testing only, shouldn't it reside in
> the tests/ source root?
>
> Having a TFTPServer would be cool though, but I have no idea
> what level of quality it is.
Wouldn't a server implementation like that be outside the
If TFTPServer is for testing only, shouldn't it reside in
the tests/ source root?
Having a TFTPServer would be cool though, but I have no idea
what level of quality it is.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
ht
James Carman schrieb:
> On 3/3/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> James Carman schrieb:
>>
>>
>>> Does anyone mind if I start a 2.0 exploratory branch where we can look
>>>
>> > into splitting JCL up into multiple modules?
>> >
>>
>>
>> I think you're biting off
Oliver Heger a écrit :
Do we need to specify a date format?
Because a configuration file is not intended to be viewed or edited by
an end user we could define our own format (e.g. the format used by the
java.sql date types) and always use it for date <-> string conversions.
Properties file
--- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the adding components to the sandbox bit that
> Matt raised; here are
> some I'd like to bring in. It's stuff from osjava
> that I haven't found
> replacements that I like yet:
So these are the types of proposals you meant:
informal?
To be sure
On 3/3/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Carman schrieb:
>
> > Does anyone mind if I start a 2.0 exploratory branch where we can look
> > into splitting JCL up into multiple modules?
> >
>
>
> I think you're biting off a really big task here.
>
> SLF4J has strengths, but a
Thanks H.
-Matt
--- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rules say anyone can simply start one.
>
> Community meme is closer to:
>
> * Send a proposal to the list.
> * Listen to any
> ideas/objections/enthusiasm/cynicism.
> * Start component.
>
> Hen
>
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 8:42 PM,
On 03/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Oberhuber, Martin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also,
> >
> > I see that while commons.net 1.4.1 compiled properly against
> > J2SE-1.2, there are build errors in 1.5.0 with J2SE-1.2:
> >
> > T
James Carman schrieb:
> Does anyone mind if I start a 2.0 exploratory branch where we can look
> into splitting JCL up into multiple modules?
>
I think you're biting off a really big task here.
SLF4J has strengths, but also weaknesses. There are some things it does
better than commons-logging,
On 02/03/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is a release vote for Commons Net 2.0. This release is a major new
> release with a huge number of changes and fixes. This release requires
> JDK 1.5+.
>
> The changes are here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Oberhuber, Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also,
>
> I see that while commons.net 1.4.1 compiled properly against
> J2SE-1.2, there are build errors in 1.5.0 with J2SE-1.2:
>
> TFTPServer.java
> SocketTimeoutException is unknown in J2SE-1.2 or 1.3
>
> I t
On 03/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: niallp
> Date: Mon Mar 3 02:22:57 2008
> New Revision: 633028
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=633028&view=rev
> Log:
> Set svn:eol-style and svn:keywords properties (no actual changes, may
> produce *noise*)
>
T
Also,
I see that while commons.net 1.4.1 compiled properly against
J2SE-1.2, there are build errors in 1.5.0 with J2SE-1.2:
TFTPServer.java
SocketTimeoutException is unknown in J2SE-1.2 or 1.3
I think it's a severe regression to require J2SE-1.4 or
later just because of newly added TFTPServe
Also, I get unit test failures in
FTPClientConfigFunctionalTest.testTimeZoneFunctionality()
as well as all FTP Windows tests (looks like ftp.wacom.com
is down -- should a different Windows FTP Server be added?)
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Ma
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 10:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>
>
> > Niall Pemberton schrieb:
> >
> >> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 3:26 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 3/2/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Does anyone mind if I start a 2.0 exploratory branch where we can look
into splitting JCL up into multiple modules?
James Carman
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Jörg Schaible
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 3/2/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> It may seem like I broke a number of builds with my changes today,
> >> but half of them [codec, discovery, JCI, VFS] were already f
On 3/3/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll try to find time to look into it, but it won't be for at least a
> couple of weeks.
>
> Commons-logging does some *very* unusual things with classpaths during
> integration-tests, because the tests need to check how things work in
>
I added the clirr report and it shows quite a few incompatible changes
from the 1.4.1 release - this should be at least highlighted in
release notes.
Niall
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -1 from me because the source distro includes a "commons-net-2.
I've added source file headers to those that were missing and
corrected the ones which didn't conform to current policy (i.e. had
the Copyright notice):
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=633032
Also added the clirr report - and running the report says that 1.5 is
binary compatible wi
Hi Rory,
it's great to hear some progress is being made towards a new
commons.net release!!!
For the 1.5 release candidate, I notice that the binary
JAR now has the examples classes embedded whereas the 1.4
release did not. Also, some Maven POM stuff is in META-INF.
Is this intentional?
jar tfv
-1 from me because the source distro includes a "commons-net-2.0"
folder (in src) which looks like a copy of the "target" folder
containing the generated site, classes, distros etc. Not sure how this
got generated because running the assembly target for me generated the
source distro correctly. Als
This distributiion has not been built from whats been tagged as
NET_1_5_0 in subversion - the pom.xml and issue-tracking.xml files are
different. Also the source distro contains files which are not in the
subversion repo (TFTPClient-1.4.1-fix.diff, TFTPClient.java.orig and
TFTPClient.java.rej) and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Niall Pemberton schrieb:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 3:26 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 3/2/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > It may seem like I broke a number of builds with my changes today, but
>>> > half of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 3/2/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It may seem like I broke a number of builds with my changes today,
>> but half of them [codec, discovery, JCI, VFS] were already failing
>> before, for the rest...
>>
>> 1) Validator - now fixed (caused by upgr
Niall Pemberton schrieb:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 3:26 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 3/2/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > It may seem like I broke a number of builds with my changes today, but
>> > half of them [codec, discovery, JCI, VFS] were already
39 matches
Mail list logo
