hi all Commons Email dev,
I found when i want to send several emails in one connection, Commons Email
doesn't help. It connects to the SMTP server per email, and it spends more
time on authentication than sending the mails themselve (most SMTP server
needs authentication). So I have to code on the
On 2/19/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2008 4:32 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/19/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 2/19/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I'm +0 on this release because I like to review the
On Feb 20, 2008 4:32 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/19/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/19/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm +0 on this release because I like to review the actual artifacts
> > > that are going to be distributed. The di
On 2/19/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/19/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm +0 on this release because I like to review the actual artifacts
> > that are going to be distributed. The distros IMO meet ASF release
> > requirements but if I run command "mvn -Pr
On 2/19/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm +0 on this release because I like to review the actual artifacts
> that are going to be distributed. The distros IMO meet ASF release
> requirements but if I run command "mvn -Prc site assembly:assembly"
> then the binary distro created a
I'm +0 on this release because I like to review the actual artifacts
that are going to be distributed. The distros IMO meet ASF release
requirements but if I run command "mvn -Prc site assembly:assembly"
then the binary distro created also includes the javadocs and also
-sources.jar and -javadoc.ja
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Phil Steitz wrote:
> This is a vote to release Commons Math 1.2.
>
> The zips / tars are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-1.2-RC3/
>
> The site included in the binary distro is here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-1.2-RC3/docs/
>
> Release notes:
> http
Oliver Heger a écrit :
Currently I get 39 test errors. I also get exceptions of the following
type:
testParentReloadNotSupported(org.apache.commons.configuration2.TestSubnodeConfiguration)
Time elapsed: 0.016 sec <<< ERROR!
java.lang.AbstractMethodError:
org.apache.xerces.dom.DocumentImpl.
On 19/02/2008, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb a écrit :
> > On 19/02/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> This is a vote to release Commons Math 1.2.
> >>
> >
> > I assume the SVN tag is:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_1_2_RC3/
> >
>
All,
I have prepared a commons-proxy-1.0-rc2 release candidate. The
distribution files can be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~jcarman/commons-proxy-1.0-rc2/
and the site can be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~jcarman/commons-proxy-1.0-rc2/site
The SVN tag used to create the release ca
sebb wrote:
On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/19/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, as far as I can tell these are the current issues with this
release candidate (and what I've done to fix them):
1. Source
On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/19/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So, as far as I can tell these are the current issues with this
> > > release candidate (and what I've done to fix them):
> > >
> > >
On 2/19/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/19/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So, as far as I can tell these are the current issues with this
> > > release candidate (and what I've done to fix them):
> > >
> > > 1.
On 2/19/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, as far as I can tell these are the current issues with this
> > release candidate (and what I've done to fix them):
> >
> > 1. Source Incompatible w/1.3 - Changed the source/target to 1.4 i
On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, as far as I can tell these are the current issues with this
> release candidate (and what I've done to fix them):
>
> 1. Source Incompatible w/1.3 - Changed the source/target to 1.4 in
> proxy's pom file
>
> 2. Javadoc Links - The new J
So, as far as I can tell these are the current issues with this
release candidate (and what I've done to fix them):
1. Source Incompatible w/1.3 - Changed the source/target to 1.4 in
proxy's pom file
2. Javadoc Links - The new Javadocs will have links to JDK, XML-RPC,
Javassist, AOP Alliance, a
On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/19/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It's written to be 1.3 compliant.
> >
> > It appears to be so if one uses Maven, however I just tried it with
> > Eclipse, and there are some classes which are not compatible with 1.3.
> >
> >
Luc Maisonobe schrieb:
Oliver Heger a écrit :
The distributions look good. All build variants worked for me on a JDK
1.6.
Regarding the site: The clirr report shows some errors. According to
the release notes there are no binary incompatible changes. Is this okay?
Yes. Clirr flags as errors
Emmanuel Bourg schrieb:
Hi,
I noticed that several tests fail on the 2.x branch since the removal of
the commons collections dependency. We now have digester 1.8 and
beanutils 1.7 which should work fine without commons collections, but I
keep getting a NoSuchMethodError on running the tests w
On 2/19/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's written to be 1.3 compliant.
>
> It appears to be so if one uses Maven, however I just tried it with
> Eclipse, and there are some classes which are not compatible with 1.3.
>
> RuntimeException does not have RuntimeException([String,]Throwable)
Oliver Heger a écrit :
The distributions look good. All build variants worked for me on a JDK 1.6.
Regarding the site: The clirr report shows some errors. According to the
release notes there are no binary incompatible changes. Is this okay?
Yes. Clirr flags as errors protected fields that ha
The distributions look good. All build variants worked for me on a JDK 1.6.
Regarding the site: The clirr report shows some errors. According to the
release notes there are no binary incompatible changes. Is this okay?
A minor point are the 292 checkstyle errors.
Oliver
Phil Steitz schrieb:
sebb a écrit :
On 19/02/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is a vote to release Commons Math 1.2.
I assume the SVN tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_1_2_RC3/
The zips / tars are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-1.2-RC3/
The sit
On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/19/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > There are no digests (.md5 or .sha) and no signature (.asc) files.
> >
>
> I went by these directions:
>
> http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html
>
> which doesn't mention anything
On 2/19/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are no digests (.md5 or .sha) and no signature (.asc) files.
>
I went by these directions:
http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html
which doesn't mention anything about doing digests or signing the
release candidates. That is left for
On 19/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2008 6:31 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 2/19/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
What you describe is the preferred way to stage a site. Go ahead and
update the docs.
James Carman wrote:
All,
I propose changing the release preparation documents. Currently is says:
Maven 2 builds should temporarily add a site location to the
:
stagingSite
scp://people.apache
Artifacts all look good and m1 and m2 builds both ran OK for me (but I
only tested using JDK 1.5) - so +1 from me
Niall
On Feb 19, 2008 2:57 AM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a vote to release Commons Math 1.2.
>
> The zips / tars are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/m
On Feb 19, 2008 6:31 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/19/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I have prepared a commons-proxy-1.0-rc1 release candidate. The
> >
Phil Steitz a écrit :
This is a vote to release Commons Math 1.2.
The zips / tars are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-1.2-RC3/
The site included in the binary distro is here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-1.2-RC3/docs/
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math
On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/19/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have prepared a commons-proxy-1.0-rc1 release candidate. The
> > > distribution files can be found at:
> > >
> > > http://people.a
On 2/19/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have prepared a commons-proxy-1.0-rc1 release candidate. The
> > distribution files can be found at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jcarman/commons-proxy-1.0-rc1/
> >
>
> Can't access the
On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have prepared a commons-proxy-1.0-rc1 release candidate. The
> distribution files can be found at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jcarman/commons-proxy-1.0-rc1/
>
Can't access the archives:
You don't have permission to access
/~jcarman/co
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by NiallPemberton:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsOsgi
--
|| di
Emmanuel,
I've added it into my pom.xml and I will include that in the rc2
release candidate.
On 2/19/08, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A minor suggestion regarding the javadoc, that would be nice if the
> pages were linked to the JDK javadoc. This was done through the
> maven.javad
I'd like to release commons-build-plugin.
Artifacts available for review are here:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/cbp-1.0-rc1/
SVN Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-build-plugin/tags/commons-build-plugin-1.0-RC1/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/cbp-1.0-rc1/site/
On 2/19/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/nightly-builds.html says that nightly builds
> are allowed, but that the general public should not be pointed to
> them.
>
> Seems to me that the front page and download pages for a project are
> intended for the general publ
I'll include that in the rc2 email. ;)
On 2/19/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be helpful to include the SVN tag in the e-mail so the
> release artifacts can be checked against SVN...
>
> On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have prepared a commons-proxy-1.0
I wonder why that's not part of the parent pom? That is a good idea! :)
On 2/19/08, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A minor suggestion regarding the javadoc, that would be nice if the
> pages were linked to the JDK javadoc. This was done through the
> maven.javadoc.links property with
I would wait to see if there are any other problems reported, and then
cut another RC as necessary.
S///
On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This went in after I cut the rc1. Does this need to be included in
> the release? Should I cut rc2?
>
> On 2/19/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A minor suggestion regarding the javadoc, that would be nice if the
pages were linked to the JDK javadoc. This was done through the
maven.javadoc.links property with Maven 1, I don't know the equivalent
with Maven 2.
Emmanuel Bourg
James Carman a écrit :
I have prepared a commons-proxy-1.0-
It would be helpful to include the SVN tag in the e-mail so the
release artifacts can be checked against SVN...
On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have prepared a commons-proxy-1.0-rc1 release candidate. The
> distribution files can be found at:
>
> http://people.apache.or
This went in after I cut the rc1. Does this need to be included in
the release? Should I cut rc2?
On 2/19/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: niallp
> Date: Tue Feb 19 07:56:34 2008
> New Revision: 629135
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=629135&view=rev
> Log:
> U
On 19/02/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a vote to release Commons Math 1.2.
>
I assume the SVN tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_1_2_RC3/
> The zips / tars are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-1.2-RC3/
>
> The site included
I have prepared a commons-proxy-1.0-rc1 release candidate. The
distribution files can be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~jcarman/commons-proxy-1.0-rc1/
and the site can be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~jcarman/commons-proxy-1.0-rc1/site
Note: This is my first release, so please look
All,
I propose changing the release preparation documents. Currently is says:
Maven 2 builds should temporarily add a site location to the
:
stagingSite
scp://people.apache.org/home//public_html/foo-1.2rc1/site
Rather than temporarily changing a pom (it just seemed "hacky" to m
http://www.apache.org/dev/nightly-builds.html says that nightly builds
are allowed, but that the general public should not be pointed to
them.
Seems to me that the front page and download pages for a project are
intended for the general public, and therefore should not link
directly to nightly bui
On Feb 19, 2008 3:41 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Go for it. I'll re-cut my rc1 after your changes have been made.
Great thanks - I'm done:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=629130
At some point this stuff will get moved up to commons-parent - but we
need a commons
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Go for it. I'll re-cut my rc1 after your changes have been made.
On 2/19/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2008 3:27 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I actually thought about that before. I don't know much about OSGi.
> > What exactly is it that you need
Niall, if you want to jump in, please do so on the proxy-1.0-work
branch. I'll merge everything back up to trunk when I'm done cutting
the release and I get the go-ahead vote for it. Let me know when
you're done so that I can cut the rc1 release.
On 2/19/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On Feb 19, 2008 3:27 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I actually thought about that before. I don't know much about OSGi.
> What exactly is it that you need to do? Do you need a list of all of
> the "services" that I support? Because, there are three flavors of
> the same service (P
I actually thought about that before. I don't know much about OSGi.
What exactly is it that you need to do? Do you need a list of all of
the "services" that I support? Because, there are three flavors of
the same service (ProxyFactory).
On 2/19/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> J
James,
I see you gearing up for a first proxy release - is there any chance I
could jump in and add OSGi info to proxy's manifest before the
release?
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsOsgi
Niall
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by NiallPemberton:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
-
Sorry, found my answer in the docs.
On 2/19/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For an initial release, should it be 1.0 or 1.0.0?
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
For an initial release, should it be 1.0 or 1.0.0?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/19/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Feb 19, 2008 12:44 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Should we open up a JIRA for this? Should we maybe add this to the
> > > directions for promoting to proper?
>
On 2/19/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2008 12:44 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Should we open up a JIRA for this? Should we maybe add this to the
> > directions for promoting to proper?
>
> I think just do it rather than opening a JIRA ticket - good
On Feb 19, 2008 2:22 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Feb 19, 2008 1:04 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Feb 19, 2008 12:44 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Should we open up a JIRA for t
On 19/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2008 1:04 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Feb 19, 2008 12:44 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Should we open up a JIRA for this? Should we maybe add this to the
> > > directions for promot
On Feb 19, 2008 1:04 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2008 12:44 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Should we open up a JIRA for this? Should we maybe add this to the
> > directions for promoting to proper?
>
> I think just do it rather than opening a JIRA t
On Feb 19, 2008 12:44 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should we open up a JIRA for this? Should we maybe add this to the
> directions for promoting to proper?
I think just do it rather than opening a JIRA ticket - good to add to
promotion doc though - do we have such a thing?
Niall
+1 for the redirect
+1 for adding that to the promotion instructions
cheers
--
Torsten
On 19.02.2008, at 13:44, James Carman wrote:
Should we open up a JIRA for this? Should we maybe add this to the
directions for promoting to proper?
On 2/19/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On
Should we open up a JIRA for this? Should we maybe add this to the
directions for promoting to proper?
On 2/19/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2008 12:39 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What should we do with old sandbox sites after the project has been
On Feb 19, 2008 12:39 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What should we do with old sandbox sites after the project has been
> promoted to the "proper"? Commons Proxy and Commons VFS still have
> their old sites out there. Should we remove them? Should we put a
> redirect page in ther
What should we do with old sandbox sites after the project has been
promoted to the "proper"? Commons Proxy and Commons VFS still have
their old sites out there. Should we remove them? Should we put a
redirect page in there?
-
Jörg Schaible a écrit :
Another change:
- Get rid of the current list handling
Currently any value is parsed for list elements and if the list delimiter is
found, it will return only the first value. IMHO a list should only be returned
if 'getList' is called (with an optional delimiter param
68 matches
Mail list logo
