On 19/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/19/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > There are no digests (.md5 or .sha) and no signature (.asc) files. > > > > I went by these directions: > > http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html > > which doesn't mention anything about doing digests or signing the > release candidates. That is left for the next step of actually > publishing the release. However, I think I should sign the rc2 so > that you guys can look over that to make sure I do that correctly > also. >
OK - most other votes I've seen also include them. > > The Manifest file in the binary jar is rather difficult to read - in > > particular the import-export lines are not nicely wrapped. Also the > > ordering of entries is rather odd, e.g. the compiler source and target > > versions are normally next to each other. > > > > See Niall's answer regarding the manifest. > OK. > > The NOTICE.txt file in SVN says: > > > > Copyright 2006-2008 > > > > However the pom says: > > > > <inceptionYear>2005</inceptionYear> > > I probably should change the NOTICE.txt file to 2005 - 2008. > > > > > The code seems to build OK using maven and java 1.4. > > > > What version of Java is Proxy intended for? > > > > Currently it inherits the java source and target versions from the > > parent POM; these are both set to 1.3. > > > > > > It's written to be 1.3 compliant. It appears to be so if one uses Maven, however I just tried it with Eclipse, and there are some classes which are not compatible with 1.3. RuntimeException does not have RuntimeException([String,]Throwable) constructors, nor do Exception.getCause() String.matche(String) exist in 1.3. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
