On 2/19/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm +0 on this release because I like to review the actual artifacts > that are going to be distributed. The distros IMO meet ASF release > requirements but if I run command "mvn -Prc site assembly:assembly" > then the binary distro created also includes the javadocs and also > -sources.jar and -javadoc.jar. Which kind of makes the argument for > reviewing actual artifacts.
Is there something in the pom that shouldn't be there? I don't think there's anything too crazy in the pom that should cause it to be generating weird artifacts. Is it something in the parent pom? > > Niall > > On Feb 19, 2008 11:31 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All, > > > > I have prepared a commons-proxy-1.0-rc2 release candidate. The > > distribution files can be found at: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jcarman/commons-proxy-1.0-rc2/ > > > > and the site can be found at: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jcarman/commons-proxy-1.0-rc2/site > > > > The SVN tag used to create the release can be found at: > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/proxy/tags/proxy-1.0-rc2 > > > > All issues brought up thus far with the first release candidate have > > been addressed. Again, this is my first release (including signing), > > so please review thoroughly (not that you normally don't). > > > > Thank you, > > > > James Carman > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
