Yeah, let me boot up my Solaris 8 box ;)
Hen
On Dec 3, 2007 10:15 AM, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Point taken :)
>
>
> On Dec 3, 2007 10:12 AM, Christoph Kutzinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That's not entirely true
> >
> > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/download.html
> > "On So
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Phil Steitz wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2007 11:09 AM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Tomcat has been bitten [1] by a bug [2] in pool-1.3. Currently we are
>> considering reverting to pool-1.2 but would obviously prefer to move to
>> pool-1.4 (that included a fix for [2]) due to the man
>
> --- Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Another issue is that Sun has end-of-lifed JDK 1.3.
> > It doesn't make sense to
> > me to continue to support a platform even Sun has
> > given up on.
>
Since all contributions are on a volunteer-basis, if somebody really wants
it fixed for 1.
--- Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another issue is that Sun has end-of-lifed JDK 1.3.
> It doesn't make sense to
> me to continue to support a platform even Sun has
> given up on.
I know what it's like to work in slow-adoption shops.
My current shop is just _about_ to move from 1.4
Point taken :)
On Dec 3, 2007 10:12 AM, Christoph Kutzinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's not entirely true
>
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/download.html
> "On Solaris 8 - J2SE 1.3.1 is continuing in the Sun End of Life (EOL)
> process. The EOL transition period began Oct 25, 2004 and will
That's not entirely true
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/download.html
"On Solaris 8 - J2SE 1.3.1 is continuing in the Sun End of Life (EOL) process.
The EOL transition period began Oct 25, 2004 and will continue until the the
end of the Solaris 8 five year Vintage Support Period."
;-)
> Another
Another issue is that Sun has end-of-lifed JDK 1.3. It doesn't make sense to
me to continue to support a platform even Sun has given up on.
On Dec 3, 2007 7:26 AM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We've three 1.3 specific compile time pro
--- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've three 1.3 specific compile time problems. Do
> we move to 1.4, or
> just fix these?
>
> Two currently in SVN:
>
> [javac]
>
/Users/hen/apache/commons-proper/lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/text/ExtendedMessageFormat.java:356:
> Messa
Hello,
the class documentation[1] of fft states
"We require the length of data set to be power of 2"
and the method documenation[1] this
"Perform the base-4 Cooley-Tukey FFT algorithm (including inverse)."
One must be wrong:
base-4 alogrithm means that the length of data has to be power of 4
fft
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=25184&projectId=178
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 3 Dec 2007 03:31:54 -0800
Finished at: Mon 3 Dec 2007 03:32:57 -0800
Total time: 1m 2s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Number
1.5 + new package!
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> My preference is to keep this release and branch of [lang] as 1.3
> compatible, primarily as part of the purpose of [lang] is to
> fill in JDK
> holes for old JDKs.
>
> I would then suggest that [lang] switches to Java 5, in a new package.
>
> Steph
12 matches
Mail list logo
