Another issue is that Sun has end-of-lifed JDK 1.3. It doesn't make sense to
me to continue to support a platform even Sun has given up on.

On Dec 3, 2007 7:26 AM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> --- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We've three 1.3 specific compile time problems. Do
> > we move to 1.4, or
> > just fix these?
> >
> > Two currently in SVN:
> >
> >     [javac]
> >
>
> /Users/hen/apache/commons-proper/lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/text/ExtendedMessageFormat.java:356:
> > MessageFormat(java.lang.String,java.util.Locale) has
> > private access in
> > java.text.MessageFormat
> >     [javac]         super(pattern, locale);
> >     [javac]         ^
> >     [javac]
> >
>
> /Users/hen/apache/commons-proper/lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/text/NumberMetaFormat.java:120:
> > cannot resolve symbol
> >     [javac] symbol  : method getIntegerInstance
> > (java.util.Locale)
> >     [javac] location: class java.text.NumberFormat
> >     [javac]
> > .getIntegerInstance(getLocale()));
> >
> > and one in the simplest solution to LANG-381.
> >
> > Thoughts? 1.4 time?
>
> Ugh, sorry the subject didn't catch my attention
> during perfunctory weekend email checking.  This
> ExtendedMessageFormat stuff has sure been a can of
> worms.  I don't think there's any reason to force a
> JRE upgrade on my account.  I've fixed one of these
> (will check in momentarily) and will be investigating
> the other.
>
> -Matt
>
> >
> > Hen
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>  
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Get easy, one-click access to your favorites.
> Make Yahoo! your homepage.
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to