1.5 + new package!

Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> My preference is to keep this release and branch of [lang] as 1.3
> compatible, primarily as part of the purpose of [lang] is to
> fill in JDK
> holes for old JDKs.
> 
> I would then suggest that [lang] switches to Java 5, in a new package.
> 
> Stephen
> 
> 
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>> We've three 1.3 specific compile time problems. Do we move to 1.4,
>> or just fix these? 
>> 
>> Two currently in SVN:
>> 
>>     [javac]
> /Users/hen/apache/commons-proper/lang/src/java/org/apache/comm
ons/lang/text/ExtendedMessageFormat.java:356:
>> MessageFormat(java.lang.String,java.util.Locale) has private access
>>     in java.text.MessageFormat [javac]         super(pattern,
>>     locale); [javac]         ^
>>     [javac]
> /Users/hen/apache/commons-proper/lang/src/java/org/apache/comm
ons/lang/text/NumberMetaFormat.java:120:
>> cannot resolve symbol
>>     [javac] symbol  : method getIntegerInstance  (java.util.Locale)
>>     [javac] location: class java.text.NumberFormat
>>     [javac]                     .getIntegerInstance(getLocale()));
>> 
>> and one in the simplest solution to LANG-381.
>> 
>> Thoughts? 1.4 time?
>> 
>> Hen
>> 
>> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to