Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/672
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user anshul1886 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867
CLOUDSTACK-9706: Added snapshots cleanup in start and storage GC threâ¦
â¦ad if they are failed to cleanup during DeleteSnapshot command
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669
@sureshanaparti, Can you have a look at this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user anshul1886 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/803
CLOUDSTACK-8833: Fixed Generating url and migrate volume to another
storage , resulting two entry in UI and listvolume is not working for that
volume
Update the volume id in
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/803
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1941
@koushik-das, That PR is still not merged. @karuturi @rhtyd This PR has
LGTM now. Can we merge it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1941
@GabrielBrascher, Those tests failure are not related to this PR and seems
to be failing most of the time and reported as intermittent failures. @rhtyd
@karuturi @serg38, We have already
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669
@karuturi, We can merge this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1977
LGTM. This change occurs due to code around that are gets diverged in
master and 4.9 with merge of PR #1727.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/803
@rhtyd Rebased against latest master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/868
@rhtyd, Rebased against latest master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1269
@rhtyd , Rebased against latest master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
@rhtyd , Rebased against laster master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
@abhinandanprateek, That's the behaviour we disallow VM to be deployed in
disabled Pod. But Virtual router was getting deployed as it was getting called
through system user for whi
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
@abhinandanprateek, Yes they are using same deployment planner. But VR was
getting created in disabled Pod but not regular VM because for VR deployment
system user context was getting set
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
@abhinandanprateek #1860 should take care of last host id scenario. Other
case of user specifying host, should we not allow deploying VM in disabled Pod?
That's a separate issue by th
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
@abhinandanprateek @koushik-das That change is intentional to allow admin
users to deploy VM on disabled. Ticket which shows that it is intentional
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user anshul1886 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
CLOUDSTACK-9198: Virtual router gets deployed in disabled Pod
While starting the router, send the user from the callingContext instead of
defaulting to System user.
https
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1868
@ustcweizhou, In my opinion we should not do that as that way we are giving
them option of silently deploying VM on some host which he might not be aware
of. As after specifying host he is
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1865
@koushik-das, This method is there so that it only gets called when the
call is made through 8096 port. Other parameters processing is done at common
place.
---
If your project is set up
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1868
@ustcweizhou, Actually I am restoring to old behaviour of 3.x release which
got changed to current behaviour because of bug.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1269
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user anshul1886 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1269
CLOUDSTACK-8867: Added retry logic to reconnect to host on connection
termination to console
It also improves handling of sessions to hypervisor in console proxy
https
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1845#discussion_r104339191
--- Diff:
services/console-proxy-rdp/rdpconsole/src/main/java/streamer/apr/AprSocketSource.java
---
@@ -103,44 +103,46 @@ public void poll(boolean
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
@GabrielBrascher @rafaelweingartner, Please go through deployment planner
code. Deployment planner decides the VM placement and virtual router also goes
through that. Deployment planners
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
@rafaelweingartner, Basically CallContext.current().getCallingAccount(); is
setting the proper context which is later used. If you have observed in code
all the api calls have a similar call
GitHub user anshul1886 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/868
CLOUDSTACK-8894: Restrict vGPU enabled VMs dynamic scaling if new service
offering has different vGPU type
It fixes the bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8894
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/868
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user anshul1886 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/803
CLOUDSTACK-8833: Fixed Generating url and migrate volume to another
storage , resulting two entry in UI and listvolume is not working for that
volume
Update the volume id in
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/803
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1868
@ustcweizhou, Is it looking good to you now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
@rafaelweingartner, Yes we can agree on those changes. But with additional
description when the CallContext.current().getCallingAccount() call is made
then it is setting the proper context
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#discussion_r104846603
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/wrapper/LibvirtCopyFileInVmCommandWrapper.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,59
GitHub user anshul1886 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/793
CLOUDSTACK-8827: Move the VM snapshots stuck in transitional states to
stable states during managment server restart
i.e. If snapshot in creating state move it to Error state and if it is
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/793
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/793
@serg38 That case is already handled. Issue arises if management server
goes down then we didn't get chance to clean things up.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/793
@rhtyd Rebased the branch to latest master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/793
@koushik-das @sateesh-chodapuneedi @ramkatru @karuturi @rhtyd Regarding
unit tests, I can't see any useful tests can be written here which I have
already specified the reason for. Al
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1868
@ustcweizhou Added the global setting
allow.deploy.vm.if.deploy.on.given.host.fails to control the behaviour.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1868
@ustcweizhou I think default value should be false. As it tells the user to
make informed decision instead of misleading according to original purpose of
parameter. @sateesh-chodapuneedi
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1282
@swill Added the return true statement. @rhtyd Snapshot in Allocated state
means nothing is done for that snapshot so only deletion from DB is needed.
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1269
@GabrielBrascher @alexandrelimassantana I kept it that way for readability
as console proxy code is hard to debug.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/868#discussion_r105116946
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1535,6 +1535,19 @@ private boolean upgradeRunningVirtualMachine(Long
vmId, Long
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669
@DaanHoogland @rafaelweingartner Will have a look at the proposed changes
and get back to you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
@nvazquez @rafaelweingartner @GabrielBrascher, That method is called from
multiple places. There are many places where we can do these kind of changes. I
would prefer to have those kind of
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
@rafaelweingartner stop start destroy etc all methods related to virtual
router code have these parameters? Questions there is why are they not removed
in the first place when they
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1269
@GabrielBrascher The other method is there for legacy purposes and is no
longer get used in Cloudstack. This was getting used in 2.x versions for UI.
Some third party tool might be using it
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1853#discussion_r106378310
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/dc/dao/DedicatedResourceDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -312,6 +317,65 @@ public DedicatedResourceVO findByHostId(Long hostId
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1853#discussion_r106380082
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/deploy/DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -584,105 +583,64 @@ private void
checkForNonDedicatedResources
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1853#discussion_r106381321
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/deploy/DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -584,105 +583,64 @@ private void
checkForNonDedicatedResources
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867#discussion_r106384378
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1078,6 +1082,16 @@ public void cleanupStorage(boolean recurring
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867#discussion_r106385035
--- Diff:
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/SnapshotObject.java
---
@@ -191,7 +191,8 @@ public void
processEvent
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867#discussion_r106386503
--- Diff:
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/XenserverSnapshotStrategy.java
---
@@ -194,18 +194,22 @@ protected
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867#discussion_r106387348
--- Diff:
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/SnapshotObject.java
---
@@ -191,7 +191,8 @@ public void
processEvent
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867#discussion_r106387626
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/snapshot/SnapshotManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1181,6 +1181,17 @@ public boolean configure(String name, Map params
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867#discussion_r106388631
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1078,6 +1082,16 @@ public void cleanupStorage(boolean recurring
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867
@koushik-das Made the changes as per review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user anshul1886 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867
CLOUDSTACK-9706: Added snapshots cleanup in start and storage GC threâ¦
â¦ad if they are failed to cleanup during DeleteSnapshot command
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1853#discussion_r106632584
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/dc/dao/DedicatedResourceDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -312,6 +317,65 @@ public DedicatedResourceVO findByHostId(Long hostId
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1853#discussion_r106632802
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/deploy/DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -584,105 +583,64 @@ private void
checkForNonDedicatedResources
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1853
@koushik-das Made the changes as per review comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867
@koushik-das Failing tests doesn't seems to be related to this patch.
Rebased against latest master to trigger the build.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1853
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user anshul1886 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1853
CLOUDSTACK-9696: Fixed Virtual Router deployment failing if there areâ¦
⦠no shared resources available
and has access to resources through parent domain heirarachy
You can
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2043
CLOUDSTACK-9876: Removed test test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot
As we no longer have that restriction and now after fix for CLOUDSTACK-8663
we allow VM and volume snapshots to exist together
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1941
@karuturi Raised #2043 to remove the test which is no longer needed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1282#discussion_r111531779
--- Diff:
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/XenserverSnapshotStrategy.java
---
@@ -245,6 +245,12 @@ public boolean
GitHub user anshul1886 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867
CLOUDSTACK-9706: Added snapshots cleanup in start and storage GC threâ¦
â¦ad if they are failed to cleanup during DeleteSnapshot command
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1282
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
@rafaelweingartner Sorry for the late reply. But it seems you have
misunderstood me here. I am not pointing finger here. I was just trying to
point out that there may be developer concern
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/26
CLOUDSTACK-7688, CLOUDSTACK-7747: restricted various operations for VM w...
...ith VM snapshots which breaks VM snapshots.
Now they are informed that they cannot perform the
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/27
CLOUDSTACK-7767: fixed events are not generated for snapshot creation
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/anshul1886
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/28
CLOUDSTACK-7541: Added restriction to not allow custom disk offering with
disksize
Added restriction to not allow custom disk offering with disksize
UI doesn't allow but with A
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/29
CLOUDSTACK-7758: Fixed although api calls are failing, event tab shows them
as successful
Fixed although api calls are failing, event tab shows them as successful
You can merge this pull
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/30
CLOUDSTACK-7703, CLOUDSTACK-7752: Fixed deployment planner stuck in
infinite loop
CLOUDSTACK-7703, CLOUDSTACK-7752: Fixed deployment planner stuck in
infinite loop.
If we create VM
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/31
CLOUDSTACK-7620: Added SNMP MIB file for snmp-alerts plugin
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/anshul1886/cloudstack-1
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/28#issuecomment-61080108
There seems to be some setup issue. This commit has made changes into
custom disk offering. And that test is passing fine. Also error logs also shows
some setup
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/27#issuecomment-61217217
Yes, this should go to 4.5 as well. Somebody can cherry-pick this to 4.5.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/31
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/31#issuecomment-63287776
closing pull request as this got merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/30
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/30#issuecomment-63287919
closing this PR as patch got committed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/39
CLOUDSTACK-7932: Fixed wrong semantics for isVmAlive() method in
HypervInvestigator
Fixed wrong semantics for isVmAlive() method in HypervInvestigator
Findbugs will report error on
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/40
CLOUDSTACK-7929: Unhandled exception when setting negative value for
throttling rate while creating network offering
To fix issue while creating network offering if one specifies negative
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/41
CLOUDSTACK-7930, CLOUDSTACK-7931: Do not allow to set invalid values for
global settings which are of type integer and float
Do not allow to set invalid values for global settings which are
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/39#issuecomment-63429460
Actually null has different meaning than false. False means that vm is not
alive while null means it cannot be determined whether it is alive or not.
This
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/40#discussion_r20488120
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -3723,6 +3723,10 @@ public NetworkOffering
createNetworkOffering
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/39#issuecomment-63432886
No. Because agent is reporting status of host. We cannot determine the
status of VMs from that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/41#discussion_r20489652
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -725,6 +725,21 @@ private String validateConfigurationValue(String
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/41#discussion_r20489860
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -725,6 +725,21 @@ private String validateConfigurationValue(String
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/56
CLOUDSTACK-8067: Fixed NPEs in MS log related to console proxy VM
Fixed NPEs in MS log related to console proxy VM
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/64
CLOUDSTACK-6900: Fixed if we download a volume and then migrate the same
volume, then migration fails
In findByStoreVolume method of VolumeDataStoreDao now listing only those
volumes whose
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/64
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/68
CLOUDSTACK-6900: This fixes volume migration failing after that volume is
downloaded
When we download volume then we create entry in volume_store_ref table.
We mark the volume entry to
1 - 100 of 328 matches
Mail list logo
