Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638
Trillian test result (trillian-pr1638-46-kvm-centos68-cs410):
Test completed. 45 look ok, 7 have errors
Test | Result | Time
--- | --- | ---
test_01_updatevolumedetail
Github user marcaurele commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640
@koushik-das
> If the MS is not able to determine the state of the VM, it tries fencing
off the VM (using the various fencers available). If VM cannot be fenced off
successfully, the sta
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1646
code LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1654
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1654
Job ID-98
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1623
Trillian test result (trillian-pr1623-38-vmware-55u3-cs48):
Test completed. 37 look ok, 12 have errors
Test | Result | Time
--- | --- | ---
test_createRegion | Success
GitHub user lygutas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1655
Fix ajaxviewer.js to solve console on Firefox
Mozilla Firefox displays white tile in place of cursor. The reason -
function isImageLoaded() always returns true after first load and function
ch
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1656
CLOUDSTACK-9466: Fix fk constraint failure in upgrade path
In the 4.1.0-4.2.0 db upgrade path, it creates new tables to store secondary
(nfs) storage in image_store table and volumes in volume
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1646
@jburwell yes that and we can also verify from packages that the version is
reflected in the pkg names.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1646
Given we've enough reviews and tests (Travis) passing, I'll go ahead merge
this and merge this fwd to master. On master, I'll send another PR that changes
code version to 4.10.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
---
Github user lmrv commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/40
Hi Rajani, hi Milamber
My name is Antoine, I come from France.
I actually work on a CloudStack plateform.
I really miss a french translation of the admin doc, so I star
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1656
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1656
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1656
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1656
Job ID-99
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1646
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1630
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1646
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1648
@jburwell sure, looks like it failed again for one of the tests (failed to
cleanup domain), I'll debug this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1648
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1648
test/integration: fix tearDown order in list_acl_ tests
test/integration: fix tearDown order in list_acl_ tests
In several of the list_acl_tests, the tests run for simulator onl
Hi B,
This seems like a network issue to me, you may try changing networks and see if
that works, or identify if there are any firewall policies in your network
barring you to access those url resources.
Regards.
From: B Prakash
Sent: 23 August 2016 10:22:45
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1646
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1646
Job ID-100
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1646
Fwd-merged this to master, with db version on master fixed during merge
conflict to 4.10.0.0-SNAPSHOT, and db paths fixed as 4.9.0->4.9.1->4.10.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can re
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1655
LGTM. @lygutas can you share a screenshot, before/after?
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1655
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1623
It's been amended and rebased. I still haven't had time to add a new DAO
method to the IP address DAO. I can work on that now though. When is the RC
being cut?
---
If your project is set u
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1655
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1655
Job ID-101
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Historically, CloudStack's debian/deb packages/repositories have never been
supported by the initial authors. For example, initial ACS version and all CCP
releases never shipped deb packages, nor in our (old and recent) documentation
we promote installation/running CloudStack on Debian/Ubuntu. A
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1599
Due to changes in marvin, specifically the code generator that runs during
build-time and is not used with either Travis or otherwise, manual tests have
confirmed the functionality working. With e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1599
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1634
@jburwell thanks
- I've fixed the markdown issues -- see this for example --
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638#issuecomment-241644475
- I'll fix the sorting issues, to so
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1634
We've enough LGTMs and test result (with vmware), I'll fire another
Trillian job with KVM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
> Op 23 augustus 2016 om 11:38 schreef Rohit Yadav :
>
>
> Historically, CloudStack's debian/deb packages/repositories have never been
> supported by the initial authors. For example, initial ACS version and all
> CCP releases never shipped deb packages, nor in our (old and recent)
> document
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
@serg38 sorry the `test` keyword is restricted to RMs and few other people
for now. There are failure that causes initial setup to fail. Can you confirm
if this (mgmt server and usage server) work
GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1656
CLOUDSTACK-9466: Fix fk constraint failure in upgrade path
In the 4.1.0-4.2.0 db upgrade path, it creates new tables to store secondary
(nfs) storage in image_store table and volumes in volu
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1656
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
It seems good, but I'm worried if the management server is also aware if
this. The Answer going back to the mgmt server needs to tell it that the format
became QCOW2.
I don't have a test e
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1657
CLOUDSTACK-9467: Add symlink to key file for usage server
On fresh installation, the usage server fails to start if the `key` file
does
not exist in its classpath. The issue is reproducible i
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1657
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user ProjectMoon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624#discussion_r75853547
--- Diff: server/test/com/cloud/user/AccountManagerImplTest.java ---
@@ -231,6 +253,73 @@ public void cleanup() {
CallContext.unregister(
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1657
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian repo:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1657
Job ID-102
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Has been rebased against latest 4.8 and the `TODO` comments removed. The
map was left alone though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1657
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1657
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos6 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been
kicked to run smoke tests against packages at
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1657
---
If your projec
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/40
I'll review this PR, give me few days...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1656
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1657
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
@rhtyd Confirming. No issues on usage and management servers.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
@koushik-das Actually there are 3 default VPC offerings.
Default VPC offering
Redundant VPC offering
Nuage VSP VPC Offering
The last 2 were introduced in May. VPC offering becomes default if 4th
parameter is true in createVpcOffering e.g.
createVpcOffering(nuageVPCOfferingName, nuageVPCOfferi
Github user NuxRo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1653
So, you guys kind of lost me, all I want is my VRs not to be used in DNS
reflection attacks.
Do we have a go or does it break things? :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user dcarbone commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1591
@jburwell: JIRA ticket created:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9468
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
@jburwell Sure, they are squashed now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1606
John, I'll defer to Aaron on this, as he submitted the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user swill opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1658
Added an additional JSON diff output to the ApiXmlDocReader
The original TXT diff format is very hard to work with if you are trying to
programmatically use the output to generate documentation.
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
For reference, here are the DB entries:
![snapshot_stor
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1634
Trillian test result (trillian-pr1634-49-kvm-centos68-cs49):
Test completed. 45 look ok, 7 have errors
Test | Result | Time (s)
--- | --- | ---
test_04_rvpc_privat
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1654
I think a db upgrade path is missing causing Travis failures.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605
@nvazquez,
Very nice proposal this one. I have only very small suggestions, which are
the following:
* The method âvideoCardConfigâ, would be better if called
âconfigure
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1560
LGTM from me here ;)
thanks @serg38 and @nvazquez for the hard work.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
What I see to remember somehow is that the management server/code always
thinks a snapshot is in the same format as the base image was.
So when you try to do something with this snapshot it
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
Yeah, there seems to be some black magic going on here. We'll dig into this
a bit more.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
@kiwiflyer @nathanejohnson as part of your continued evaluation, can you
evaluate the following test cases to ensure this new behavior is verified and
regression tested:
* ``smoke/test
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605
@serg38 looking through PR #1310, I don't see any Marvin test cases to
exercising this behavior.
@nvazquez please add Marvin tests to exercise specifying vGPU parameters
when creatin
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
@abhinandanprateek do you have time to test this PR when upgrading a a
clustered usage server environment from 4.9 to master?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1591
@dcarbone thanks for creating a JIRA ticket. Could you please prepend the
headline of your commit message with the ticket ID (i.e. [CLOUDSTACK-9468])?
Additionally, the Travis build is failin
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1657
@rhtyd do you see any potential conflict between this PR and PR #1593?
Also, the Travis build failed. Could you please investigate?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
@nathanejohnson could you please create JIRA ticket for this issue and
prepend the commit message with the ID?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1656
@rhtyd would it be possible to re-target this PR to the 4.8 branch? It
seems like a good fix to include in 4.8.2.0 as well as 4.9.1.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605
@rafaelweingartner Thanks for your review! I'll work on your suggestions!
@jburwell Sure, I'll work on it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Hi , all
There is a bug in com.cloud.network.resource.JuniperSrxResource
It will report syntax error when configure outgress rule to Juniper srx
hardware firewall.
begin line 2830 :
if
(type.equals(SecurityPolicyType.SECURITYPOLICY_EGRESS_DEFAULT)) {
Wido,
My only issue is dropping for any distro between patch releases. If someone is
running 4.9.0.0 on Ubuntu 12.04, and they need to update to 4.9.1.0+ (e.g. to
get a CVE fix), they will be stranded. This failure seems to fail the Law of
Least Surprise. While I recognize that it is unlikel
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1653
@NuxRo this patch does not appear to break things. However, we want to add
a Marvin test case to verify that the fix does not regress again. Does that
make sense?
@rhtyd is planning
Hi Gust,
The changes look good please go head and raise a PR for it.
Thanks,
Jayapal
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 8:14 AM, Gust wrote:
>
> Hi , all
>
> There is a bug in com.cloud.network.resource.JuniperSrxResource
>
> It will report syntax error when configure outgress rule to Juniper srx
> hardwa
Guys,
I am not sure on overall developer talk, but let me understand something
here.
Bit about setup:-
So, at my new work place, we already have 5 zones (each zone with its own
management server) with management node running on Ubuntu 12.04. ACS 4.4.2
and XENserver 6.2. It was setup by someone w
> Op 24 augustus 2016 om 6:38 schreef John Burwell :
>
>
> Wido,
>
> My only issue is dropping for any distro between patch releases. If someone
> is running 4.9.0.0 on Ubuntu 12.04, and they need to update to 4.9.1.0+ (e.g.
> to get a CVE fix), they will be stranded. This failure seems to
> Op 24 augustus 2016 om 7:47 schreef Makrand :
>
>
> Guys,
>
> I am not sure on overall developer talk, but let me understand something
> here.
>
> Bit about setup:-
> So, at my new work place, we already have 5 zones (each zone with its own
> management server) with management node running o
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1656
@jburwell fixed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1656
There are no upgrade tests to confirm the fix as all the changes are in an
older 4.1.0->4.2.0 upgrade path. After this fix, here are manual test results
to show that db upgrade finished cleanly wi
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1648
@jburwell can you review/lgtm now? thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1657
@jburwell no this is PR is related to packaging, while 1593 fixes something
different. The Travis build failure has been fixed at #1648, the failures are
unrelated to this PR. Since this is a pack
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1634
Merging based on lgtms and test results (the failures are due to env
issues, and failing tests not related to the pkging fix).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1634
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1647
@wido based on the ML discussion, I've removed the specific change that
removed 12.04 support. Can you send another PR for master for removing support
for 12.04.
---
If your project is set up fo
82 matches
Mail list logo
