Re: Anybody saw this error on master?

I see this on KVM as well. I don't recall hearing about the GPU feature, sounds interesting. 014-03-14 01:14:06,302 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (StatsCollector-1:ctx-b3b2e81f) Details from executing class com.cloud.agent.api.GetGPUStatsCommand: Unsupported command issued:com.cloud.agent

Re: Anybody saw this error on master?

oh yes, I do remember this. We probably need to fix the null pointer, but I think it's more or less just noise. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Marcus wrote: > I see this on KVM as well. I don't recall hearing about the GPU > feature, sounds interesting. > > 014-03-14 01:14:06,302 DEBUG [agent.m

RE: Anybody saw this error on master?

Hi Min, Which version of XS you are working on? --Sanjay -Original Message- From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 6:18 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Anybody saw this error on master? Hi there, Anybody has seen this error on master? It is

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

I have no idea if its related to this branch merge or not, but I'm unable to start the ssvm on master since I pulled about an hour ago. I can deploy a fresh zone, and the ssvm will actually start, but it can't transition state in the DB, so it kills the vm. 2014-03-14 01:57:46,356 DEBUG [vm.dao.VM

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #426

See Changes: [koushik] CLOUDSTACK-6052: List VM enhancement to support querying with multiple VM IDs [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-6215: Updating test case to accomodate condition for VMware

RE: Anybody saw this error on master?

I have resolved this issue under this ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6238 --Sanjay -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 1:09 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Sanjay Tripathi Subject: Re: Anybody saw this

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

creating a new router does the same... 2014-03-14 02:06:41,446 DEBUG [vm.dao.VMInstanceDaoImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-5:Job-41/Job-42 ctx-91928df8) Unable to update VM[DomainRouter|r-5-VM]: DB Data={Host=1; State=Running; updated=3; time=Fri Mar 14 02:06:11 MDT 2014} New Data: {Host=1; State=Running;

RE: Release cadence

I think it's a very difficult subject, because we're relying on the developers to write tests which will show whether the code in their feature is good, and think of every possible failure mode in order to ratify their code. Obviously if they can think of the failure, they'll probably have coded

RE: Differences between 4.3 and 4.3-forward

Will these automatically go into 4.3.1, do we know if they've gone into master as well? Otherwise does this mean we have a load of bug fixes which we're not putting into 4.3.0 which could potentially become orphaned in the 4.3-forward branch? (this query may be just my ignorance regarding ACS b

Re: Master is broken?

Sorry, I see what the problem is. I've been looking for other possible side effects. But this should only affect anything in ApiDispatcher after standardDispatchChain.dispatch(new DispatchTask(cmd, params)); because the params used are not the same object processed in the dispatchChain. I'm going t

Re: Review Request 18964: Windowsfication of CloudStack Management Server - Changes to support windows OS

> On March 11, 2014, 12:28 p.m., Donal Lafferty wrote: > > 1. How do you guarantee that 'sudo' is never added to scripts created by > > the Script class? See (utils/src/com/cloud/utils/script/Script.java) > > > > 2. How do you version control the .exe? > > > > 3. WiX can be run on Linux in

Re: Differences between 4.3 and 4.3-forward

Paul, they might be disapproved patches as well. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > Will these automatically go into 4.3.1, do we know if they've gone into > master as well? > > Otherwise does this mean we have a load of bug fixes which we're not putting > into 4.3.0 which cou

Re: Review Request 18964: Windowsfication of CloudStack Management Server - Changes to support windows OS

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/ --- (Updated March 14, 2014, 9:16 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P

Re: Release cadence

Our problem is in the test coverage of the existing code base not in new features! As \Paul said dev will code tests they can think of. It's the ones they didn't think of that will break stuff. But we don't mind if new features aren't fully functional. We mind regression the most. You can not blame

Re: Review Request 18964: Windowsfication of CloudStack Management Server - Changes to support windows OS

> On March 11, 2014, 12:28 p.m., Donal Lafferty wrote: > > 1. How do you guarantee that 'sudo' is never added to scripts created by > > the Script class? See (utils/src/com/cloud/utils/script/Script.java) > > > > 2. How do you version control the .exe? > > > > 3. WiX can be run on Linux in

Re: Review Request 18964: Windowsfication of CloudStack Management Server - Changes to support windows OS

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/#review37185 --- The exe which was a major issue for this patch has been removed. Th

Re: Review Request 19038: CLOUDSTACK-6090: Virtual Router Service Failure Alerting

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19038/ --- (Updated March 14, 2014, 9:36 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vi

Re: Review Request 18964: Windowsfication of CloudStack Management Server - Changes to support windows OS

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/ --- (Updated March 14, 2014, 9:42 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

On 11.03.2014 15:28, Hugo Trippaers wrote: Hey guys, I didn’t go and tally all the +1s and -1s for the shift of the feature freeze, but with so many reactions i feel sticking to the schedule is the only way to go. We should only change dates if there is a consensus and there clearly is none at t

Re: Master is broken?

The params are converted to lowercase, the problem is the processed params are available only inside the dispatch chain, so later when the rest of the method ApiDispatcher#dispatch tries to get the param, in the map where it was looking up it was still with Camel Case name. I think the proper way t

Re: Review Request 19038: CLOUDSTACK-6090: Virtual Router Service Failure Alerting

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19038/#review37187 --- Commit f7337527cf9dbb35ec4c60621d4b37173635660c in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 18964: Windowsfication of CloudStack Management Server - Changes to support windows OS

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/#review37186 --- Can you add some doc or ref to doc that explains how to test this on

RE: [Merge] Storage motion for hyper-v

I'll merge these changes later today. Regards, Devdeep > -Original Message- > From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 7:32 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [Merge] Storage motion for hyper-v > > Hi, > > I would like to merge s

Re: Master is broken?

If you have an account on the wiki, I can add some rights to it (or any pmc member could) On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Antonio Fornié Casarrubios wrote: > The params are converted to lowercase, the problem is the processed params > are available only inside the dispatch chain, so later when

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #4296

Do I ask for access to builds.apache.org here? or at infra? this rat is eating me by now. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See > > -- > Started by an SCM change > Bu

Re: Master is broken?

I do have for Antonio Fornie antonio.for...@gmail.com 2014-03-14 11:02 GMT+01:00 Daan Hoogland : > If you have an account on the wiki, I can add some rights to it (or > any pmc member could) > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Antonio Fornié Casarrubios > wrote: > > The params are converted t

Re: Master is broken?

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Antonio Fornié Casarrubios wrote: > antonio.fornie is in -- Daan

Re: Review Request 19038: CLOUDSTACK-6090: Virtual Router Service Failure Alerting

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19038/#review37188 --- Ship it! master -> f7337527cf9dbb35ec4c60621d4b37173635660c, f293c

slow build

Guys `n' dolls, One if the new tools for maintaining our quality is the new job slowbuild. It does a build and then runs findbugs (and other tools) against our code base. Since a while this has been going on and it succeeds if no new warnings where introduced since last successful build. For a whi

RE: [Merge] CLOUDSTACK-6106 vpc support on Hyper-V

I will be merging my branch changes later today. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:42 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [Merge] CLOUDSTACK-6106 vpc support on Hyper-V Fixed all

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #427

See Changes: [sanjay.tripathi] CLOUDSTACK-6238: NPE in HostStatsCollector. [koushik] CLOUDSTACK-6090: Virtual Router Service Failure Alerting -- [...truncated 18054 lines...] Tests r

Re: Review Request 19036: CLOUDSTACK-6092: Storage OverProvisioning as a Per Primary Basis

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19036/ --- (Updated March 14, 2014, 11:21 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Sin

Re: Review Request 19036: CLOUDSTACK-6092: Storage OverProvisioning as a Per Primary Basis

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19036/#review37190 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sateesh Chodapuneedi On March 14, 2014, 11:2

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2469

See Changes: [Devdeep Singh] CLOUDSTACK-6143: Storage motion support for hyper-v. With these changes a volume on a shared [muralimmreddy] -introduces 'DistributedRouter' as capability to 'Connectivity' service. [muralimmr

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #475

See Changes: [muralimmreddy] -introduces 'DistributedRouter' as capability to 'Connectivity' service. [muralimmreddy] -add check to ensure 'Connectivity' service provider specified in [muralimmreddy] mark VPC to be using distribute

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #476

See

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 13.03.2014 21:24, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: [Animesh] Did you see this with prior RC too? [Animesh] Nux, security group support for advanced zone is limited and that too was developed in 4.2. I don’t think any changes have been made to that support since then. Can you call out what specific i

Re: Review Request 18964: Windowsfication of CloudStack Management Server - Changes to support windows OS

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/ --- (Updated March 14, 2014, 12:10 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan

Re: Review Request 19036: CLOUDSTACK-6092: Storage OverProvisioning as a Per Primary Basis

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19036/ --- (Updated March 14, 2014, 12:10 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Sin

Re: Review Request 19036: CLOUDSTACK-6092: Storage OverProvisioning as a Per Primary Basis

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19036/ --- (Updated March 14, 2014, 12:10 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Sin

Re: Review Request 18964: Windowsfication of CloudStack Management Server - Changes to support windows OS

> On March 14, 2014, 9:58 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java, line 881 > > > > > > why is this condition needed if both the if and the else branch take > > the same

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-noredist #2470

See

Re: Review Request 18964: Windowsfication of CloudStack Management Server - Changes to support windows OS

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/#review37191 --- Hi Daan I have updated the FS in wiki regarding how to build and in

Re: Review Request 18964: Windowsfication of CloudStack Management Server - Changes to support windows OS

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/#review37192 --- Hi Daan I have updated the FS in wiki regarding how to build and in

Re: Review Request 19036: CLOUDSTACK-6092: Storage OverProvisioning as a Per Primary Basis

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19036/#review37193 --- Commit 48f8a95b06b0348ba1349cb5434183c2c18710db in cloudstack's bran

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 14.03.2014 12:06, Nux! wrote: It looks like the traffic doesn't go in the right chains, all traffic is accepted as FORWARD is set to ACCEPT. There are zero packets going through BF-breth0-109. Here's outputs from: iptables-save: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/85337/47982321/raw/ ebatables-sav

Re: Review Request 19021: Cloudbyte Elastistor storage plug-in

hi guys, i have resolved all issues with fixes and refactoring of plugin code, its good to go now , i'll submit once i get the ship it message. thanks for the review. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:19 AM, punith s wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://re

Re: Master is broken?

I am seeing another issue on master. Filed a bug for this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6239 Thanks, ~Talluri On 14/03/14 3:50 pm, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Antonio Fornié Casarrubios > wrote: >> antonio.fornie > > >is in > >-- >Daan

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

Will be doing it today, however it seems that there have been some new issues that have cropped up in master that break basic functionality. I'm not sure if anyone should merge or not while that is the case. I was attempting to validate that the latest merges played well in my branch, but I couldn

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 03/14/2014 01:57 PM, Nux! wrote: On 14.03.2014 12:06, Nux! wrote: It looks like the traffic doesn't go in the right chains, all traffic is accepted as FORWARD is set to ACCEPT. There are zero packets going through BF-breth0-109. Here's outputs from: iptables-save: http://paste.fedoraproject.

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

Can the offending check-ins be reverted or master be blocked for further check-ins till blocking issue is fixed. Talluri is running BVTs and can that be taken as basic passing criteria to re-enable check-ins. -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, M

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

-1 given the regression in Security Groups for advanced zones. I was able to duplicate NUX reported issues, e.g., works in ACS421 but does not work at all in ACS43. /Ove On 03/13/2014 01:26 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

It should be noted that my tests use a single IP per VM. I believe NUX mentioned using multiple IP's. When SG in advanced zone is enabled, only one NIC can be assigned per VM. /Ove On 03/14/2014 02:41 PM, Ove Ewerlid wrote: On 03/14/2014 01:57 PM, Nux! wrote: On 14.03.2014 12:06, Nux! wrote: I

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #1

See -- [...truncated 60 lines...] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Host Allocator Random [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Dedicated Resources [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Hypervisor Or

Re: Review Request 19036: CLOUDSTACK-6092: Storage OverProvisioning as a Per Primary Basis

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19036/#review37196 --- Commit 48f8a95b06b0348ba1349cb5434183c2c18710db in cloudstack's bran

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Did you test on fresh 4.2.1, or upgraded platform? 2014-03-14 14:51 GMT+01:00 Ove Ewerlid : > It should be noted that my tests use a single IP per VM. > I believe NUX mentioned using multiple IP's. > When SG in advanced zone is enabled, only one NIC can be assigned per VM. > /Ove > > > On 03/14/

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Is this similar to CLOUDSTACK-5144? 2014-03-14 14:57 GMT+01:00 Wei ZHOU : > Did you test on fresh 4.2.1, or upgraded platform? > >

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #428

See Changes: [koushik] CLOUDSTACK-6090: Virtual Router Service Failure Alerting [Devdeep Singh] CLOUDSTACK-6143: Storage motion support for hyper-v. With these changes a volume on a shared [muralimmreddy] -introduces 'Dist

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 13.03.2014 18:58, Nux! wrote: On 13.03.2014 00:26, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: -1 In Adv SG zone assigning secondary IPs to a NIC doesn't update the ipset accordingly on the agent/hv; it requires stopping/sta

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #2

See

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 14.03.2014 13:59, Wei ZHOU wrote: Is this similar to CLOUDSTACK-5144? Yes, but it's only exhibited on KVM. My colleague who is testing 4.3 with Xenserver is reporting the SG rules work as expected (though ipset update still requires VM stop/start). Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant

Re: Review Request 18964: Windowsfication of CloudStack Management Server - Changes to support windows OS

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/#review37198 --- server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java

RE: Differences between 4.3 and 4.3-forward

Yes that is my understanding that all of these would go in to next maintenance that is why they are staged in forward branch. -Original Message- From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 1:38 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Differences

Re: [CS4.1] Error during ip range creation

any idea ? Le 13/03/2014 16:55, nicolas.lamira...@orange.com a écrit : Yes : mysql> select * from vlan where vlan_gateway = '10.200.244.129' and vlan_netmask = '255.255.255.192' ; +-+-++-+---++--

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Nux and Ove, Did you test on fresh 4.2.1 platform? -Wei 2014-03-14 15:07 GMT+01:00 Nux! : > On 14.03.2014 13:59, Wei ZHOU wrote: > >> Is this similar to CLOUDSTACK-5144? >> > > Yes, but it's only exhibited on KVM. > My colleague who is testing 4.3 with Xenserver is reporting the SG rules > wor

Re: Review Request 19021: Cloudbyte Elastistor storage plug-in

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19021/#review37199 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Mike Tutkowski On March 13, 2014, 9:16 a.m.,

Re: Differences between 4.3 and 4.3-forward

Right, I think it's dangerous to sync 4.3.1 to 4.3 because developers might have changes in 4.3.1 that are not yet in master. This is not my situation personally, but I imagine some devs might be in this state. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti < sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com> wrot

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

I'm not sure what the offending ones are at the moment, and there was recently a feature merge that was not squashed, so it might be a little difficult to weed through. On Mar 14, 2014 7:45 AM, "Sudha Ponnaganti" wrote: > Can the offending check-ins be reverted or master be blocked for further >

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

It may even just be a behavioral change or something simple I missed that is now required with a recent check-in. Obviously I don't feel comfortable merging in my feature branch though when I pull from master and can no longer run my own feature tests. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Marcus wrot

RE: Differences between 4.3 and 4.3-forward

Yes - 4.3-forward is unstable branch and should be merged while 4.3 is going through RC. It is meant for maintenance release. -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:36 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Dif

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 14.03.2014 14:29, Wei ZHOU wrote: Nux and Ove, Did you test on fresh 4.2.1 platform? Yes. Fresh 4.2.1 doesn't have the problem, fresh 4.3 RC8 has the problem. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro

Re: Differences between 4.3 and 4.3-forward

Yes, and we definitely cannot just take all of 4.3.1 and put it in 4.3 as many of those changes are intended for 4.3.1 and not 4.3. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti < sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com> wrote: > Yes - 4.3-forward is unstable branch and should be merged while 4.3 is > g

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Can you try to revert commit 175549f3ab952bbd39318c16c269c16526255475 on ./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py ? git checkout 0898a264a5463b85c4cab3033f9c3161c5ef83f8 ./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py scp to all hosts, and try again. -Wei 2014-03-14 15:07 GMT+01:00 Nux! : > On 14.03.2014

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

OK, then ignore my previous email. it looks no issue with security_group.py 2014-03-14 15:43 GMT+01:00 Nux! : > On 14.03.2014 14:29, Wei ZHOU wrote: > >> Nux and Ove, >> >> Did you test on fresh 4.2.1 platform? >> >> > Yes. Fresh 4.2.1 doesn't have the problem, fresh 4.3 RC8 has the problem. >

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

Yes, having a temp freeze of the codebase while a build is broken is standard procedure at several places I've worked at. We should probably employ such a technique here, too. It's nothing enforced by the VCS - just something devs control when they see such an e-mail. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:

Re: Git Push Summary

On 14/03/14 7:09 PM, "h...@apache.org" wrote: >Repository: cloudstack >Updated Branches: > refs/heads/4.4 [created] 3ee1fc28d > Hugo, I was holding off merge to master, as it seems to be broken now. I see that you already created 4.4 branch. Can we wait till master is ready to be checked-in an

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

Other alternative is to block further check-ins till blocking issue is fixed. As long as BVTs are good then it can be opened up for further check ins. Just a suggestion. -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:40 AM To: dev@cloudstac

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 14.03.2014 14:43, Wei ZHOU wrote: Can you try to revert commit 175549f3ab952bbd39318c16c269c16526255475 on ./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py ? git checkout 0898a264a5463b85c4cab3033f9c3161c5ef83f8 ./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py scp to all hosts, and try again. Do you happen t

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

The build is not broken. I, personally, just cannot start VMs in my environment, even after starting afresh. It may still be something I'm doing (like a missed behavioral change), but I've seen at least one bug submitted overnight that looks like a stack trace I got. It would be nice to see if anyo

Assigning a JIRA ticket to someone

Hi, I'm trying to assign a JIRA ticket to someone who has a JIRA account, but I don't see his name in the list (I see plenty of other names in the list I recognize, though). Any thoughts on what I might be missing here? Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*

Re: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

Yes, I think we could have checked with people struggling to fix the master and commit there features. -1 for the timing to cut the branch ! On 14/03/14 8:19 pm, "Murali Reddy" wrote: >On 14/03/14 7:09 PM, "h...@apache.org" wrote: > >>Repository: cloudstack >>Updated Branches: >> refs/heads/4.

Re: Git Push Summary

Hey Muralli, The branch is already cut and the jenkins builds are setup. So i’m not going to recreate the 4.4 branch from master as all the version number are already updated. Which merge request are you merging in? If you can squash it it will be easy to pull into master and 4.4. Cheers, H

Re: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

I announced the time when i would cut the branch in advance, so it shouldn’t be a surprise. But like i replied to Muralli, if you have a pending merge request on the ML i see no problem with merging it in in the next few hours because of the trouble with master. Just make sure it hits both mast

[ACS4.4] RE: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

Can time be given till PST EOD as many developers are also in this time zone? If specific features are being pulled in to 4.4, we might as well cut branch a little later where approved merge queue is cleared. -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citri

Re: Git Push Summary

On 14/03/14 8:24 PM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >Hey Muralli, > >The branch is already cut and the jenkins builds are setup. So i¹m not >going to recreate the 4.4 branch from master as all the version number >are already updated. > >Which merge request are you merging in? If you can squash it it wil

Re: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

Thanks Hugo ! Saw your reply bit late. On 14/03/14 8:34 pm, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >I announced the time when i would cut the branch in advance, so it >shouldn¹t be a surprise. > >But like i replied to Muralli, if you have a pending merge request on the >ML i see no problem with merging it in i

Re: [ACS4.4] RE: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

The branch is already cut and master has already been switched to 4.5.0. I’ve announced that the switch would be at 14:00 CET, you can’t expect me to get up in the middle of the night to cut a release branch. Cheers, Hugo On 14 mrt. 2014, at 16:09, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Can time be give

Re: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

Since a lot of devs are basing their features that have not yet been placed in Git off of master (which is now 4.5), we need to make sure it is clear not to rebase yourself beyond 48f8a95b06b0348ba1349cb5434183c2c18710db or 4.5 code that should not be in 4.4 could be brought into 4.4. On Fri, Mar

Re: [ACS4.4] RE: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

Yes, you did. I for one was up until 2AM trying to test my branch against the current master to try to get it in, but gave up. I think most people saw "Get your merge request in today because I'll be cutting the branch on Friday". At the time that most of us in the west read that email, "get your

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 03/14/2014 03:29 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: Nux and Ove, Did you test on fresh 4.2.1 platform? Yes, fresh 4.2.1. /Ove -Wei 2014-03-14 15:07 GMT+01:00 Nux! : On 14.03.2014 13:59, Wei ZHOU wrote: Is this similar to CLOUDSTACK-5144? Yes, but it's only exhibited on KVM. My colleague who i

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 14.03.2014 14:43, Wei ZHOU wrote: Can you try to revert commit 175549f3ab952bbd39318c16c269c16526255475 on ./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py ? git checkout 0898a264a5463b85c4cab3033f9c3161c5ef83f8 ./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py scp to all hosts, and try again. I got it from

Re: Review Request 17736: CLOUDSTACK-5999: Virtual Router does not start if Guest VM is rebooted from CloudStack

> On March 13, 2014, 4:46 p.m., John Burwell wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java, line 756 > > > > > > Two queries are executed in this for loop which puts stress on the > > database and slows do

Re: Review Request 17736: CLOUDSTACK-5999: Virtual Router does not start if Guest VM is rebooted from CloudStack

> On March 13, 2014, 4:55 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > > Also why don't start routers in parallel? First, get all the router nics in > > one query like John suggested, then span start process for routers in > > separate threads, check the status of each job using Future. Sure I will do tha

Re: [ACS4.4] RE: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

Fair enough, i’ll try to send a reminder for the next phases a bit earlier. Just wanted to make sure that people wouldn’t forget to put their merge requests in on time. I’m trying to be a bit strict about the timing, we are already seeing the strain on the 4.3 release which isn’t even out ther

RE: Differences between 4.3 and 4.3-forward

> -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:43 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Differences between 4.3 and 4.3-forward > > Yes, and we definitely cannot just take all of 4.3.1 and put it in 4.3 as ma

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

Thanks Marcus. I am not aware of this convention, will remember that next time when I do the merge. -min On 3/13/14 10:30 PM, "Marcus" wrote: >Min, in looking at this branch merge, I need to be reminded whether we >are supposed to squash feature branches when they come in, or preserve >history.

Re: Master is broken?

Hi Talluri. I am trying to know what causes the issue you describe. Just to make sure I understand you, why do you think this issue is related with this change? Anybody knows anything else about it? Thanks. Cheers Antonio 2014-03-14 14:17 GMT+01:00 Srikanteswararao Talluri < srikanteswararao.tall

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

Before merge, I did a sanity zone and VM deployment test, and worked fine on my setup after fixing the issues introduced by Antonio's commit. I can verify this again today. From the symptom, it seems not related to IAM change. Thanks -min On 3/14/14 1:07 AM, "Marcus" wrote: >creating a new ro

Re: Master is broken?

ApiDispatcher#dispatchAbout the previous questions, I think checkUuid() should be executed in any case. Actually this part was added recently, before that there was already the return to avoid getting to the cmd.execute(). So I think when the checkUuid was added it should have been added for any c

Re: Review Request 19039: CLOUDSTACK-2266: Adding automation tests for IP reservation feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19039/ --- (Updated March 14, 2014, 4:44 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Santhosh Edu

  1   2   >