Before merge, I did a sanity zone and VM deployment test, and worked fine
on my setup after fixing the issues introduced by Antonio's commit. I can
verify this again today. From the symptom, it seems not related to IAM
change.
Thanks
-min
On 3/14/14 1:07 AM, "Marcus" <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>creating a new router does the same...
>
>2014-03-14 02:06:41,446 DEBUG [vm.dao.VMInstanceDaoImpl]
>(Work-Job-Executor-5:Job-41/Job-42 ctx-91928df8) Unable to update
>VM[DomainRouter|r-5-VM]: DB Data={Host=1; State=Running; updated=3;
>time=Fri Mar 14 02:06:11 MDT 2014} New Data: {Host=1; State=Running;
>updated=3; time=Fri Mar 14 02:06:11 MDT 2014} Stale Data: {Host=1;
>State=Starting; updated=2; time=Fri Mar 14 02:05:52 MDT 2014}
>2014-03-14 02:06:41,448 ERROR [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>(Work-Job-Executor-5:Job-41/Job-42 ctx-91928df8) Failed to start
>instance VM[DomainRouter|r-5-VM]
>com.cloud.exception.ConcurrentOperationException: Unable to transition
>to a new state.
>at
>com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineMana
>gerImpl.java:1029)
>at
>com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerI
>mpl.java:775)
>
>On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have no idea if its related to this branch merge or not, but I'm
>> unable to start the ssvm on master since I pulled about an hour ago. I
>> can deploy a fresh zone, and the ssvm will actually start, but it
>> can't transition state in the DB, so it kills the vm.
>>
>> 2014-03-14 01:57:46,356 DEBUG [vm.dao.VMInstanceDaoImpl]
>> (Work-Job-Executor-1:Job-33/Job-34 ctx-5fc7b113) Unable to update
>> VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-1-VM]: DB Data={Host=1; State=Running;
>> updated=19; time=Fri Mar 14 01:57:11 MDT 2014} New Data: {Host=1;
>> State=Running; updated=19; time=Fri Mar 14 01:57:11 MDT 2014} Stale
>> Data: {Host=1; State=Starting; updated=18; time=Fri Mar 14 01:56:38
>> MDT 2014}
>> 2014-03-14 01:57:46,359 ERROR [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>> (Work-Job-Executor-1:Job-33/Job-34 ctx-5fc7b113) Failed to start
>> instance VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-1-VM]
>> com.cloud.exception.ConcurrentOperationException: Unable to transition
>> to a new state.
>> at
>>com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineMan
>>agerImpl.java:1029)
>> at
>>com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineMan
>>agerImpl.java:5129)
>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>> at
>>sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java
>>:57)
>> at
>>sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorI
>>mpl.java:43)
>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>> at
>>com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.
>>java:107)
>> at
>>com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineMana
>>gerImpl.java:5274)
>> at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:102)
>> at
>>org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInCont
>>ext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:491)
>> at
>>org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(Manage
>>dContextRunnable.java:49)
>> at
>>org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(D
>>efaultManagedContext.java:56)
>> at
>>org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWith
>>Context(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
>> at
>>org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithC
>>ontext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
>> at
>>org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedC
>>ontextRunnable.java:46)
>> at
>>org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(Async
>>JobManagerImpl.java:448)
>> at
>>java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
>> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
>> at
>>java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java
>>:1145)
>> at
>>java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.jav
>>a:615)
>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Min, in looking at this branch merge, I need to be reminded whether we
>>> are supposed to squash feature branches when they come in, or preserve
>>> history. It's nice to preserve history, but it's a lot easier to undo
>>> a squashed merge.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> IAM branch is now merged to master.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -min
>>>>
>>>> On 3/13/14 10:13 AM, "Min Chen" <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Since we haven't heard of any objections to this merge for 3 days, I
>>>>>am
>>>>>going to merge it to master today.
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks
>>>>>-min
>>>>>
>>>>>On 3/11/14 12:23 PM, "Hugo Trippaers" <h...@trippaers.nl> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On 11 mrt. 2014, at 19:52, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, have already run FingBugs on our branch and addressed all new
>>>>>>> findings introduced by our branch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Awesome! :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>> -min
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/10/14 7:33 PM, "Min Chen" <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No new jar dependencies.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -min
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 10, 2014, at 7:22 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal"
>>>>>>>>> <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any new jar dependencies?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/10/14, 11:34 AM, "Min Chen" <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Prachi and I would like to merge CloudStack Identity and Access
>>>>>>>>>> Management(IAM) plugin services to the master branch.
>>>>>>>>>>Development
>>>>>>>>>>for
>>>>>>>>>> this effort has been done by Prachi and me on ACS rbac branch
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>(https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=short
>>>>>>>>>>log;
>>>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>>=r
>>>>>>>>>> ef
>>>>>>>>>> s/heads/rbac).
>>>>>>>>>> Checklists for the merge:
>>>>>>>>>> 1. JIRA ticket:
>>>>>>>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5920.
>>>>>>>>>> 2. Functional Specs:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack
>>>>>>>>>>+Ide
>>>>>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>>>>ti
>>>>>>>>>> ty
>>>>>>>>>> +and+Access+Management+%28IAM%29+Plugin. We have proposed this
>>>>>>>>>>feature
>>>>>>>>>> back in Jan, and accommodated all the feedbacks in our
>>>>>>>>>>implementation.
>>>>>>>>>> 3. Unit tests for the feature are available at:
>>>>>>>>>> services/iam/server/test
>>>>>>>>>> (for iam server) and services/iam/plugin/test (for iam plugin).
>>>>>>>>>> 4. Marvin integration tests for the feature are available at:
>>>>>>>>>> test/integration/smoke/test_vm_iam.py.
>>>>>>>>>> 5. Branch has been rebased with master branch up to commit
>>>>>>>>>> 63e3eea7905e22cab9466b28a2ab2a80b586aeed.
>>>>>>>>>> 6. RAT test has been passed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>> -min
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
