Re: Breaking docs out

ok, +0 then, I'm off for a coffee. On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > I'm +0 on it. Don't really mind either way. > > Jessica T. > > From: Radhika Puthiyetath [radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 9:25 PM

Re: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup

Hi Marcus, I wonder could we take the most recent Jenkins-built System VM template and get it hosted somewhere, then let people know the URL? We could then replace the old acton systemvm URL [1] with the new URL wherever it appears in docs etc. I'd imagine the template doesn't change all that much

CloudStack Storage Plugin for CloudByte

Hi, I will be working on implementing the CS storage plugin for CloudByte's Elastistor. This new plugin should be based on the newly refactored storage plugin changes which has gone into 4.2 release already. Which CS release can accommodate this new storage plugin feature ? Regards, Amit *Cloud

Re: Review Request 13316: CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type Information on the Database.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13316/#review24780 --- Commit 23aaeafd21aa667a82dca813e7314ab60a6b2ac7 in branch refs/heads

RE: CloudStack Storage Plugin for CloudByte

The next release will probably be 4.3. You can target the CloudByte plugin for that release. The can find more information on CloudStack release cycle here [1]. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Releases Regards, Devdeep > -Original Message- > From: Amit Das [m

Re: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup

I think Citrix has done this, at least that's why comes out of the db now: | http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2 | | http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 | | http://download.cloud.com/templ

Re: CloudStack Storage Plugin for CloudByte

On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 12:50:43PM +0530, Amit Das wrote: > Hi, > > I will be working on implementing the CS storage plugin for CloudByte's > Elastistor. > > This new plugin should be based on the newly refactored storage plugin > changes which has gone into 4.2 release already. > > Which CS rel

Re: Review Request 13316: CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type Information on the Database.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13316/#review24781 --- Commit 0b00e13e24d9207067e64eaa714f7adee31958da in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13316: CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type Information on the Database.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13316/#review24782 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On Aug. 6, 2013, 9:14 a.m., Sa

Re: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup

Great stuff, thanks Prasanna! On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > I think Citrix has done this, at least that's why comes out of the db now: > > | > http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2 > | > | > http://download.cloud.co

Re: CloudStack Storage Plugin for CloudByte

Thanks for the information. Has 4.3 release planning been done ? Regards, Amit *CloudByte Inc.* On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 12:50:43PM +0530, Amit Das wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I will be working on implementing t

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24783 --- Commit 1978d7bd7311d19a4b370a679cfd364d54e1e300 in branch refs/heads

Re: Comment about "Data Disk Offering" when creating a VM from an ISO

I noticed this issue long ago, and I agree with you. In my understanding, while the tab in the VM wizard always says "Data Disk Offering," if you create a VM using ISO, this step actually means Root Disk Offering. If this is the case, the tab name should depend on whether the user chooses Select

Re: Review Request 12747: Fix configuration of Jetty-based execution so that CloudStack can execute scripts properly

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12747/#review24784 --- Submitted to master in commit 49c9fbfb70413f86642956423c4bbba2e43d8a

Review Request 13370: CLOUDSTACK-4101: Update the Xenserver template/checksum in template.sql to the one verified.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13370/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOU

RE: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup

Hi, Please use Xenserver template which is updated @ http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2 Thanks, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Dave Cahill [mailto:dcah...@midokura.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 1:14 PM To: dev@cloudstac

Re: Review Request 13323: if a failure occurs while adding VM to another network (this should be the first vm in the subnet). The ip alias created as a part of this process is not removed.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/ --- (Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 8:22 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokharc

Re: Values within commands.properties.in

Curious for long. When does the rule RESOURCE_DOMAIN_ADMIN come in place in CloudStack? A CloudStack account can only be root admin, domain admin, or user. Does RESOURCE_DOMAIN_ADMIN refer to something internal?

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ --- (Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 8:38 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vitt

RE: [Doc] Egress Firewall Rules for Review

Hi Jayapal, I have incorporated your comments, and the updated doc is posted at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2685. Thanks -Radhika From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 11:15 AM To: Radhika Puthiyetath Subject: Re: [Doc] Egress Firewall Rules for Review

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

> On Aug. 6, 2013, 11:40 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java, line 79 > > > > > > I don't quite understand this part. Why "//" is missing in this case? > > Who would require "//" and who

Re: Is the simulator broken?

Worked a bit better today. Some tests failed. mvn -Pdeveloper,marvin.test -Dmarvin.config=setup/dev/advanced.cfg -pl :cloud-marvin integration-test [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudSta

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ --- (Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 8:50 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vitt

Re: Review Request 13323: if a failure occurs while adding VM to another network (this should be the first vm in the subnet). The ip alias created as a part of this process is not removed.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/ --- (Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 8:53 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokharc

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

> On Aug. 6, 2013, 11:40 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java, line 147 > > > > > > No reference of getTypeOf(URI) in the code? this code supplies facilities for features that are being

Re: Review Request 13323: if a failure occurs while adding VM to another network (this should be the first vm in the subnet). The ip alias created as a part of this process is not removed.

> On Aug. 7, 2013, 12:03 a.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkManager.java, line 22 > > > > > > Seems not neceesary. Hi Sheng, This was already there. The IDE might have changed something.

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#review24787 --- Three minor comments, but my main concerns are addressed by this dif

Review Request 13372: CLOUDSTACK-4062: SLES 11 SP2, SLES 11 SP3, CENTOS 6.4, RHEL 6.3, RHEL 6.4 OS type missing from OS Type drop down list when registering template.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13372/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOU

Re: weird test failure

I under-kinda-stand, Does this mean I should live with the whole build failing for a while once in a while? Meaning should I change this test and submit a patch or is there some windows or java setting I should look at? On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Some insight here

Re: IP Address Allocation

things are falling into place in slow-motion. Thanks Alex! And Soheil for bringing this up. Let's have a hack session on this at the next CCC. On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > I'll say it's a bad design. He he I designed it. :( We had to make > some compromises due to

Re: api calls in 4.1.1

will do, to busy now but is bound to get priority without further pushing from my side:| On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Daan, > > Take this back - the error was on my part it seems (I've used cloudmonkey > with api/secret keys for another test user). > > Once I fixed the

RE: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field mandatory.....

What is the process to follow - Should a bug be raised against Apache JIRA to effect this change? Can someone let me know. Thanks, RamG > -Original Message- > From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] > Sent: 05 August 2013 14:35 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [D

RE: [Doc] IP Address Reservation is Ready for Review

Hi Radhika, two comments: * "If you decide to reserve IP ranges for non-CloudStack purposes, you can specify a part of the IP address range or the CIDR that should only be allocated by..." Remove "IP address range" as we only specify the CIDR, not the range. *

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ --- (Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 9:40 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vitt

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

Chiradeep, Sheng, Can you guys have a look at this? I cleaned up a bit with Davids guidance. thanks, Daan On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:40 AM, daan Hoogland wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ > Review request for cloudsta

[Responsiveness report] users 2013w31

LS, only three for the users list. I am sending this to the dev list because I am more comfortable there. Please direct me elsewhere if needed. It doesn't feel to right either. And note the first subject. http://markmail.org/message/niusl5p2nxbba7hi 'V4.1.0 w/ KVM Hyperv on CentOS6.4 + Adv Network

Re: Unable to create image on Cloudcentral

Prabakaran, Can you make 'I got null pointer exception' more explicit? regards, On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Prabakaran R wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to create image of virtual machine in cloudcentral using JClouds. > Following is my code snippet > > > CreateTemplateOptions templateOptio

Re: zone create wizard issue with create storagepool

Talluri, did you check the history of the files involved in creating a zone? regards, On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri wrote: > Createstoragepool fails during zone creation while creating zone using zone > create wizard. This is happening because add host is taking too

Re: Force delete domain through test case

On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Gaurav Aradhye wrote: > While forcefully deleting a domain through test case, it fails. The > resources in the domain and the domain itself gets cleaned up, but the code > fails with following error. > After cleaning up the resources, it says can't find the specific

[Responsiveness report] 2013w31 dev

the three from week 30 where still open. I asked for clarification on some of them. one is from Ian who has been present enough on this list to take care of himself. This week there is only one (disgarding Mins direct addressing of John :) I am not bothering you with this one as I responded wit

Re: Review Request 12098: Add PCI Passthrough to CloudStack on KVM Hypervisor

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12098/#review24788 --- I will rebase it in a few days. This patch only includes support fo

Review Request 13373: keep the existing changes in cloud-set-guest-sshkey.in to make sure we do not break the backward compatibility.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13373/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal Reddy. Bugs: Cloudstack-4138 Reposi

Re: Review Request 13325: preserve data in iso_id column while upgrading form 3.0.7 to 4.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13325/#review24789 --- setup/db/db/schema-307to410-cleanup.sql

Review Request 13374: Automation: Affinity Groups: Removing invalid test case

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13374/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Repository: cloudstack-gi

RE: [Doc] IP Address Reservation is Ready for Review

Thanks Saksham. They have been incorporated. The guide is refreshed and posted to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-850. From: Saksham Srivastava Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 3:06 PM To: Radhika Puthiyetath; us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Abhinav Roy

Re: Review Request 13370: CLOUDSTACK-4101: Update the Xenserver template/checksum in template.sql to the one verified.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13370/#review24791 --- Commit d3666b96cd6aec4a5ac8b968f89d9f60a638572c in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13324: CLOUDSTACK-4104: VM Creation should fail if a zone is dedicated to a domain and user of the same domain deploys vm without using affinity group "Explicit Dedication"

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13324/#review24792 --- Commit a3ba198e5aba35297201bdf6b1ef127c0a5b01a5 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13372: CLOUDSTACK-4062: SLES 11 SP2, SLES 11 SP3, CENTOS 6.4, RHEL 6.3, RHEL 6.4 OS type missing from OS Type drop down list when registering template.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13372/#review24790 --- Commit 5dd155d02b5e03d20faf6826cc86f570b95b6d37 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13324: CLOUDSTACK-4104: VM Creation should fail if a zone is dedicated to a domain and user of the same domain deploys vm without using affinity group "Explicit Dedication"

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13324/#review24795 --- Commit 61c7aa7afea078239146c8957f49e8ea07ebd5db in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13370: CLOUDSTACK-4101: Update the Xenserver template/checksum in template.sql to the one verified.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13370/#review24794 --- Commit d9568c89d7afea84387f4e265e3b400c33c4dda9 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13372: CLOUDSTACK-4062: SLES 11 SP2, SLES 11 SP3, CENTOS 6.4, RHEL 6.3, RHEL 6.4 OS type missing from OS Type drop down list when registering template.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13372/#review24793 --- Commit 3de6cdb4f9422264babf14728e3ffa939d72c0b1 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13324: CLOUDSTACK-4104: VM Creation should fail if a zone is dedicated to a domain and user of the same domain deploys vm without using affinity group "Explicit Dedication"

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13324/#review24796 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On Aug. 6, 2013, 12:53 p.m., S

Re: Review Request 13370: CLOUDSTACK-4101: Update the Xenserver template/checksum in template.sql to the one verified.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13370/#review24797 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On Aug. 7, 2013, 8:12 a.m., Sa

Re: Review Request 13372: CLOUDSTACK-4062: SLES 11 SP2, SLES 11 SP3, CENTOS 6.4, RHEL 6.3, RHEL 6.4 OS type missing from OS Type drop down list when registering template.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13372/#review24798 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On Aug. 7, 2013, 9:07 a.m., Sa

Review Request 13375: CLOUDSTACK-4144 Make specifyVlan to false for shared network

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13375/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4144 R

RE: Unable to create image on Cloudcentral

Thanks, but it resolved. -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 3:43 PM To: dev; Prabakaran R Subject: Re: Unable to create image on Cloudcentral Prabakaran, Can you make 'I got null pointer exception' more explicit? reg

Re: Review Request 13325: preserve data in iso_id column while upgrading form 3.0.7 to 4.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13325/ --- (Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 1:02 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kava

Re: Review Request 13325: preserve data in iso_id column while upgrading form 3.0.7 to 4.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13325/ --- (Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 1:02 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kava

Re: Review Request 13325: preserve data in iso_id column while upgrading form 3.0.7 to 4.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13325/#review24799 --- Ship it! commit 95f36798559c71d1de9f34fedad597d12f09766b - Kishan

Re: Review Request 13373: keep the existing changes in cloud-set-guest-sshkey.in to make sure we do not break the backward compatibility.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13373/ --- (Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 1:25 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal Reddy

Review Request 13376: Fix QuickCloud secondary storage service ListTemplateCommand and ListVolumeCommand

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13376/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal and Devdeep Singh. Repository:

Re: Ruby dev wanted

Hi Chip, I just sent the pull request for the cloudstack_ruby_client on Github. Please have a look! I did some restructure works, let me know if you have any concerns, thanks. Regards Isaac On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Happy to accept pull requests for clouds

Re: Review Request 13374: Automation: Affinity Groups: Removing invalid test case

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13374/#review24800 --- Ship it! - Prasanna Santhanam On Aug. 7, 2013, 11:18 a.m., Gaurav

Re: Ruby dev wanted

On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:05:13PM +0800, Isaac Chiang wrote: > Hi Chip, > > I just sent the pull request for the cloudstack_ruby_client on > Github. Please have a look! > I did some restructure works, let me know if you have any concerns, thanks. > > Regards > > Isaac Looks great Isaac

RE: [Responsiveness report] 2013w31 dev

Daan, thanks a million for doing this! > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 6:24 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [Responsiveness report] 2013w31 dev > > the three from week 30 where still open. I

Re: IP Address Allocation

On 07/08/13 1:40 AM, "Alex Huang" wrote: >I'll say it's a bad design. He he I designed it. :( We had to make >some compromises due to time constraints. > >I always intended to move the ip allocation into NetworkGurus and >actually attempted to several times but, at the end for various reas

Review Request 13378: Test assumes storagetype to be local therefore test_egress_fw_rules fail.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13378/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Ashutosh Kelkar and Prasanna Santhanam. Reposito

Re: Review Request 13378: Test assumes storagetype to be local therefore test_egress_fw_rules fail.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13378/#review24804 --- Ship it! - Prasanna Santhanam On Aug. 7, 2013, 2:49 p.m., Girish

Review Request 13377: CLOUDSTACK-4021: [Automation] TestExplicitDedication.test_01_deploy_vm_with_explicit_dedication failed to deploy VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13377/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOU

Re: Comment about "Data Disk Offering" when creating a VM from an ISO

That sounds reasonable to me. Do you know if a bug exists for this or perhaps I should create one? On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Ryan Lei wrote: > I noticed this issue long ago, and I agree with you. > > In my understanding, while the tab in the VM wizard always says "Data Disk > Offering,"

Re: [Responsiveness report] 2013w31 dev

less and less a problem :P On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Daan, thanks a million for doing this! > >> -Original Message- >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 6:24 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Sub

Re: Review Request 13377: CLOUDSTACK-4021: [Automation] TestExplicitDedication.test_01_deploy_vm_with_explicit_dedication failed to deploy VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13377/ --- (Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 4:18 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh

Re: CloudStack Storage Plugin for CloudByte

Feel free to take a look at the SolidFire plug-in I developed for 4.2. I built it to support QoS (Min and Max IOPS guarantees), which may be of interest to you. In 4.2, it works for Disk Offerings only (hopefully Compute Offerings, as well, in 4.3). Also, since the hypervisor plug-ins needed to b

Re: CloudStack Storage Plugin for CloudByte

We have time based releases, so as long as your feature is code complete (not necessarily bug-free) by 9/30, it will hit 4.3. But first you have to formally propose the feature. Please see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/0h-VAQ https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ni-VAQ https://cwiki.apache

[ACS42]Attach volumes to Instance which has VM snapshots

Hi, I have an instance which has VM snapshots. (VMWARE hypervisor) Now I am trying to attach DATA volume to this instance. It failed saying "Unable to attach volume, please specify a VM that does not have VM snapshots" Is there any limitation not to add additional volumes if it has VM snapshot

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

> On Aug. 6, 2013, 11:40 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java, line 79 > > > > > > I don't quite understand this part. Why "//" is missing in this case? > > Who would require "//" and who

Re: CloudStack Storage Plugin for CloudByte

Thanks Mike. I have started looking into the storage related changes due to SolidFire storage plugin. I shall start the formal proposal process & communicate my git feature branch soon. Regards, Amit *CloudByte Inc.* On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Mike Tutkowski

Re: Review Request 13008: Fix usage of vm.instancename.flag when generating VM names on ESX hypervisor

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13008/#review24812 --- Ship it! commit 059e4b2ae0a44205a8567a79bf9a154a54a83492 Author: Ke

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

Donal, The mix of vlan:// and is one of the issues i had to deal with doing this. The vlan not being handled by my first patch correctly is why this second one was made. for vlans it reverts what I did before. What is it you are seeing? And how does it relate to the BroadcastDomainType? The code

Re: Review Request 13298: Put in upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.1.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13298/#review24813 --- Vijay, as the schema is empty, you don't have to have this file. Rem

[KVM] Helper for agent during HA operations

Hi, In our production setups we have seen some crashes of the KVM agent. This could happen for all kinds of reasons, but that's not what I wanted to discuss. Also see this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3954 What I've been writing for a PoC in our company is a small

RE: IP Address Allocation

I think this is a consensus of where we are: We would follow the "path of NetworkElement" meaning the infrastructure to create a service offering, the provider concept and the use of agent/host infrastructure to support external providers. (The external NetworkGuru also uses many of the same in

Re: weird test failure

I'd say the test needs to be changed to allow for a negative skew. On 8/7/13 2:05 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >I under-kinda-stand, > >Does this mean I should live with the whole build failing for a while >once in a while? Meaning should I change this test and submit a patch >or is there some win

[ACS42] Closing Resolved Defects

Hi All, Below are total and Blocker/Critical defects in resolved state. Pl take some time to close them. Even if you get to close Cortical/Blocker that would be great. Reporter Total Blocker/Critical Abhinandan Prateek 1 1 Abhinav Roy 8 7 A

Re: Values within commands.properties.in

I think 'private zones' are assigned to RESOURCE_DOMAIN_ADMIN On 8/7/13 1:29 AM, "Ryan Lei" wrote: >Curious for long. When does the rule RESOURCE_DOMAIN_ADMIN come in place >in >CloudStack? > >A CloudStack account can only be root admin, domain admin, or user. > >Does RESOURCE_DOMAIN_ADMIN refer

RE: [KVM] Helper for agent during HA operations

> -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 10:53 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: shadow...@gmail.com > Subject: [KVM] Helper for agent during HA operations > > Hi, > > In our production setups we have seen some cra

Re: Review Request 13376: Fix QuickCloud secondary storage service ListTemplateCommand and ListVolumeCommand

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13376/#review24814 --- Ship it! In the future, please format patches so that they can be a

Re: Review Request 13252: SHA256 timing attack and brute force attack fix

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/ --- (Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 7:01 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and John Kinsel

Re: Question about creating a template

Looks like a bug to me. On 8/6/13 11:28 AM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: >Hi, > >I have a small Linux ISO (http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/download.html) >I've >uploaded to my secondary storage NFS location. > >I can create VM instances just fine with it. > >I stopped one of my VMs that was created wit

Re: Review Request 13252: SHA256 timing attack and brute force attack fix

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/#review24818 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Chiradeep Vittal On Aug. 7, 2013, 7:01 p.m.,

Re: weird test failure

ok, in the mean while please have another look at https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ please? On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > I'd say the test needs to be changed to allow for a negative skew. > > On 8/7/13 2:05 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > >>I under-kinda-stand, >> >>D

Re: [KVM] Helper for agent during HA operations

why not use systemd and launchd facilities ? On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 10:53 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Cc: shadow...@gmail.com > > S

Re: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup

Hi All, Thanks for your inputs. I have tried with the suggested changes but could not get it working. I started from scratch again to see if it helps. But I seem to be going wrong in some place. Can some one kinldy go though the below setup and tell me if its right. I am stuck since a week trying

4.2 build failing with latest head

4.2 build failing with latest head, someone please look this ASAP ? [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-api --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory /ro

Re: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup

Local storage wasn't working at all yesterday in 4.2. Fixed last night. Not sure if that is related. On Aug 7, 2013 1:32 PM, "Sarath Chandra" wrote: > Hi All, > > Thanks for your inputs. I have tried with the suggested changes but could > not get it working. I started from scratch again to see if

Re: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup

On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 01:50:28PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Local storage wasn't working at all yesterday in 4.2. Fixed last night. Not > sure if that is related. The master / 4.2 quality seems to be churning a ton... this isn't a good sign IMO. Did we cram in too much at the end again?

Re: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup

No idea, it's been mostly off of my radar. I just happened to try to test a few fixes and 4.2 was having problems with local storage. At the least I'd say it's not a good idea for someone to use it (or any non-production version) right now if they're setting up cloudstack for the first time. On W

RE: 4.2 build failing with latest head

Latest build works; please ignore -Original Message- From: Rayees Namathponnan [mailto:rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 12:45 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: 4.2 build failing with latest head 4.2 build failing with latest head, someone please

[DISCUSS] KVM HA

There is long time issue related to KVM HA, see bug: CLOUDSTACK-3535. Basically, HA won't be triggered, if KVM agent is stopped either normally nor abnormally, HA only be triggered if the network between mgt server and kvm host is disconnected and the network between KVM hosts in the same cluste

Re: [KVM] Helper for agent during HA operations

For me the most useful part is that I can take down the agent without anything freaking out. It's fairly common to upgrade the agent (or stop for a minute or two) without putting the host into maintenance and dealing with migrations. That's by far the normal case for when the agent isn't running, I

  1   2   >