will do, to busy now but is bound to get priority without further pushing from my side:|
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Musayev, Ilya <imusa...@webmd.net> wrote: > Daan, > > Take this back - the error was on my part it seems (I've used cloudmonkey > with api/secret keys for another test user). > > Once I fixed the secret and api keys to a proper user that had vms, I would > see the vms entitled to that user. > > If you do come around on specifics of this issue, please let me know. > > Thanks > ilya > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 5:31 PM >> To: dev >> Subject: Re: api calls in 4.1.1 >> >> H Ilya, >> >> I am not at the bottom of this yet. It seems the api no longer returns the >> full >> list hence a certain key can not be found in the result set. >> We are looking at it (between other work). If this is the case a test >> scenario >> would need a big set of VMs:( >> >> regards, >> >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Musayev, Ilya <imusa...@webmd.net> >> wrote: >> > Daan, >> > >> > The commit CLOUDSTACK-3080 seems like the only change that was made - >> that would be related. >> > >> > I'm about to try this out and find it - if that's what broke it. >> > >> > Thanks >> > ilya >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] >> >> Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 2:26 PM >> >> To: dev >> >> Subject: Re: api calls in 4.1.1 >> >> >> >> Ilya, >> >> >> >> listVirtualMachines (as user) for one, but I got a second report that >> >> wasn't very precise yet, so I will be working on reproducing next >> >> days and report back (wit test case or patch) >> >> >> >> regards, >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Chip Childers >> >> <chip.child...@sungard.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:42:53AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> >> >> H, >> >> >> >> >> >> What is the status of 4.1.1 at this moment. I am getting several >> >> >> reports of api calls not working as before. I saw the vote passing >> >> >> by but didn't give them much attention. In jira I don't see much >> >> >> mention of such issues. Is this noticed by anybosy else? >> >> >> >> >> >> regards, >> >> >> Daan >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > 4.1.1 status is that we are working on pushing the docs, and then >> >> > the release will be announced. >> >> > >> >> > -chip >> > >> > > >
