Re: 4.2 KVM agent can't communicate with 4.1 management server

On 07/22/2013 11:29 PM, Toshiaki Hatano wrote: I got a question from this issue. Should cloudstack allow version mismatch between management and agent? I already discussed this on IRC yesterday and I wanted to start a new [DISCUSS] thread around this, didn't get to do that yet. Wido I t

Re: Review Request 12623: CLOUDSTACK-2328: Linux native VXLAN support on KVM hypervisor

> On July 19, 2013, 4:56 p.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > > scripts/vm/network/vnet/modifyvxlan.sh, line 28 > > > > > > I think there is a need to prevent the guest vm from spoofing the > > multicast? > > Toshiaki Hata

Re: [DESIGN] Why is enum a class...

+1 I am having a war on the enums in Networks.java that justifies your solution, Frank On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:57 AM, Alex Huang wrote: > +1 to do this for any enum that was designed to be added to by the plugins. > > I actually wrote a class for this before called Constant that did exactly >

Re: Review Request 12720: CLOUDSTACK: 3382 Unable to Migrate VM's If the hosts are implicitly or explicitly dedicated.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12720/#review23682 --- Ship it! Committed to 4.2 and master in commits e2f2bc5f0 and 89b94

Re: Tracing registerTemplate API, is it possible to connect Eclipse debugger to System VMs?

Great! I have successfully connected Eclipse debugger to the System VM agent, but the steps are slightly different. See below: * Step 4: I put that long string of arguments right after "java" instead of at the very end. If put at the very end, the command "java -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStore=./certs/

Re: Basic Zone network configuration

Do you have an example of /etc/network/interface config for the host in basic zone mode ? Le 23/07/2013 04:54, Ahmad Emneina a écrit : > Hey Thomas, > > Basic zones dont explicitly work with vlans. If you have vlan's behind the > scenes, say native vlans, it shouldnt be an issue as long as your re

Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das. Repository: cloudstack-git Des

Re: System VMs not coming up due to https://reviews.apache.org/r/12685/

Koushik, please review https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ It should solve the problem. regards, Daan On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Ignore my remark about master. I have been looking > At an old log. > I looked some more into this and it seems the even simpler >

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#review23683 --- Review 12849 PASSED the build test The url of build cloudstack-maste

Review Request 12853: CLOUDSTACK-3688: Test cases test_accounts.TestDomainForceRemove.test_forceDeleteDomain, not found the domain to delete and failed.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12853/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOU

Review Request 12852: CLOUDSTACK-2508: Template usage should report both physical and virtual sizes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12852/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: 2508 Repository: cloud

Re: Review Request 12808: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-2536: updating parameters (cpu/memory)overcommit ratio and (cpu/memory).overprosioning.factor are redundant(cluster level)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12808/ --- (Updated July 23, 2013, 11:41 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Koushik Das

Re: Review Request 12852: CLOUDSTACK-2508: Template usage should report both physical and virtual sizes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12852/#review23684 --- Review 12852 PASSED the build test The url of build cloudstack-maste

Re: [Discuss] Apply rules on Virtual Router

Anyone? 2013/7/22 Nguyen Anh Tu > Hi guys, > > While working with L3 network services, I found a problem in the process > of applying iptables rules. It currently works not good in my opinion. When > you apply a new rule (eg. StaticNat or Egress rule), Virtual Router backups > old rules and re-

Re: [Discuss] Apply rules on Virtual Router

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 08:52:34PM +0700, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: > > While working with L3 network services, I found a problem in the process of > applying iptables rules. It currently works not good in my opinion. When > you apply a new rule (eg. StaticNat or Egress rule), Virtual Router backups >

Re: [Discuss] Apply rules on Virtual Router

It is quite hard to do a delta update correctly, so a complete rewrite of the ruleset is the safest way to do it. Not sure why it is "slow", but I'd compare it to the time taken to start a VM. One way to make it slightly faster is to write the ruleset to a file and use iptables-restore from the fil

Re: Review Request 12853: CLOUDSTACK-3688: Test cases test_accounts.TestDomainForceRemove.test_forceDeleteDomain, not found the domain to delete and failed.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12853/#review23685 --- Review 12853 PASSED the build test The url of build cloudstack-maste

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#review23686 --- api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java

Re: Review Request 12817: CLOUDSTACK-3689: Test case test_accounts.TesttemplateHierarchy.test_01_template_hierarchy failed during ListTemplate call

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12817/#review23687 --- Commit 3e6e66fee1bf73844e0ab7158e18f038aac7071d in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12817: CLOUDSTACK-3689: Test case test_accounts.TesttemplateHierarchy.test_01_template_hierarchy failed during ListTemplate call

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12817/#review23688 --- Commit 6b2c9bf3ae1653693381431ed2554e7b7e4dfae4 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12817: CLOUDSTACK-3689: Test case test_accounts.TesttemplateHierarchy.test_01_template_hierarchy failed during ListTemplate call

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12817/#review23689 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Prasanna Santhanam On July 22, 2013, 3:25 p.

Re: Review Request 12853: CLOUDSTACK-3688: Test cases test_accounts.TestDomainForceRemove.test_forceDeleteDomain, not found the domain to delete and failed.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12853/ --- (Updated July 23, 2013, 12:34 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokha

Re: Review Request 12810: DnsMasqConfigurator need to be rewrite in bash script

> On July 22, 2013, 10:23 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > patches/systemvm/debian/config/root/dnsmasq.sh, line 54 > > > > > > You don't need so complicate way to find dns is enabled or not. Just > > check /var/cache/cloud/

Re: Review Request 12810: DnsMasqConfigurator need to be rewrite in bash script

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12810/ --- (Updated July 23, 2013, 12:42 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokha

Review Request 12854: CLOUDSTACK-3727: Resource Count calculation happens for deleted accounts on restart of managment server.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12854/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3727 Reposi

Re: Review Request 12810: DnsMasqConfigurator need to be rewrite in bash script

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12810/ --- (Updated July 23, 2013, 1:07 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokhar

Review Request 12856: [GSoC] Add midterm review

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12856/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Sebastien Goasguen. Repos

RE: [Discuss] Apply rules on Virtual Router

The file approach will definitely make it faster. Just thinking out loud, If we can write all of the rules on a file, why not do an iptables-save, perform a diff and apply the difference? --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sen

Re: [DESIGN] Why is enum a class...

All, +1 to Alex's design suggestion. Another little know feature of enumerations is the ability to define abstract methods. Therefore, Alex's example can be expanded as follows: public enum Type { User(false) { @Override public void doWork() {

Re: Review Request 12854: CLOUDSTACK-3727: Resource Count calculation happens for deleted accounts on restart of managment server.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12854/#review23691 --- Review 12854 PASSED the build test The url of build cloudstack-maste

Re: Reformatting UI code

On Jul 22, 2013, at 6:54 PM, Jessica Wang wrote: > Sebastien, > > Brian and I are fix 4.2 bugs. > Any fix for 4.2 bugs should go to both 4.2 branch and master branch. > That's why Brian and I still need to merge our check-in between master branch > and 4.2 branch. Ok got it . Ian next time y

Review Request 12858: CLOUDSTACK-3724: Test case "test_vpc_vms_deployment.py" failed to find network offering.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12858/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3724 R

Re: Review Request 12854: CLOUDSTACK-3727: Resource Count calculation happens for deleted accounts on restart of managment server.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12854/#review23694 --- Commit e2e3b9a2884d4f1029aa5e0bb5137160fd794b24 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12854: CLOUDSTACK-3727: Resource Count calculation happens for deleted accounts on restart of managment server.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12854/#review23695 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Prasanna Santhanam On July 23, 2013, 12:54 p

Re: Review Request 12854: CLOUDSTACK-3727: Resource Count calculation happens for deleted accounts on restart of managment server.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12854/#review23696 --- Commit a7084b2dac594a5851e32be692863fb9f7b23d9d in branch refs/heads

Fwd: [GSOC] Update to document

Hi Guys (Ian, Dharmesh, Shiva, Meng, Nguyen), Google needs to get our evaluation of your progress so far to decide if you keep on going or not. I sent the email below on July 5th. You now have only few days left to get it done ( I need it before Friday). I am looking for 3/4 pages describing w

Review Request 12859: fixed account objects CLOUDSTACK-3726

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12859/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3726 R

Re: Review Request 12859: fixed account objects CLOUDSTACK-3726

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12859/#review23697 --- Commit d2ce17ea73248ed92cda58df85d27c771dbfdfb3 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12859: fixed account objects CLOUDSTACK-3726

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12859/#review23700 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Prasanna Santhanam On July 23, 2013, 3:11 p.

Re: Review Request 12858: CLOUDSTACK-3724: Test case "test_vpc_vms_deployment.py" failed to find network offering.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12858/#review23699 --- Commit a06b3f40eba6ebc3af5d7c366ec757703a085f67 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12858: CLOUDSTACK-3724: Test case "test_vpc_vms_deployment.py" failed to find network offering.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12858/#review23701 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Prasanna Santhanam On July 23, 2013, 2:53 p.

Re: Review Request 12859: fixed account objects CLOUDSTACK-3726

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12859/#review23698 --- Commit 1cd435e25a36e8737d37edce1bb5da70d9b670c9 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12856: [GSoC] Add midterm review

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12856/#review23702 --- Ship it! applied to master 06484061f39f27dd3249572016e8a9adbf95851a

Re: Reformatting UI code

One other thought here is that we might want to wait until, say, the day after code freeze - if allowable - and then check in these kinds of changes (basically give them special permission to go in after code freeze). I think they're valuable since they do make the code much more readable, but it

Re: [DESIGN] Why is enum a class...

The first thing I noticed about Frank's comment is that he started it with "Frankly speaking." (Frank/Frankly) Probably not intended as a pun, but funny nonetheless. :) On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Frank Zhang wrote: > Frankly speaking, if we are going to change enum, I would suggest not >

[DISCUSS] API changes / compatibility between 4.1 and 4.2

Hi, Yesterday I encountered this bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3714 A short summary: A 4.2 agent can't communicate with a 4.2 management server and vise versa. What this means is that during an upgrade you can't upgrade the Agents one by one, since a upgraded Agent

Review Request 12864: CLOUDSTACK-3697 Fix cleanup LB failure

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12864/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3697 R

Re: Review Request 12810: DnsMasqConfigurator need to be rewrite in bash script

> On July 22, 2013, 10:23 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > patches/systemvm/debian/config/root/dnsmasq.sh, line 54 > > > > > > You don't need so complicate way to find dns is enabled or not. Just > > check /var/cache/cloud/

Re: Review Request 12858: CLOUDSTACK-3724: Test case "test_vpc_vms_deployment.py" failed to find network offering.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12858/#review23704 --- Commit 5c45645932f7537aa93f4d060e114a40dc7cbcb6 in branch refs/heads

Re: [DISCUSS] API changes / compatibility between 4.1 and 4.2

I think maybe there's a typo there, you mean to say a 4.1 agent can't communicate to a 4.2 mgmt server, and vice versa? The systemvm problem, do you mean that the system vms need to be upgraded, or are you talking about a specific bug? On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:

Re: [rant] stupid test cases

here's another one: def test_07_delete_network_with_rules(self): """ Test delete network that has PF/staticNat/LB rules/Network Acl # Validate the following # 1. Create a VPC with cidr - 10.1.1.1/16 # 2. Add network1(10.1.1.1/24) and network2(10.1.2.1/24) to this V

Re: [DISCUSS] API changes / compatibility between 4.1 and 4.2

Op 23 jul. 2013 om 18:16 heeft "Marcus Sorensen" het volgende geschreven: > I think maybe there's a typo there, you mean to say a 4.1 agent can't > communicate to a 4.2 mgmt server, and vice versa? > Correct, that was a typo. I mean 4.1 and 4.2 > The systemvm problem, do you mean that th

Re: [Discuss] Apply rules on Virtual Router

Just still thinking about the incremental applying solution... +1 for writing rules to file. 2013/7/23 Alex Huang > The file approach will definitely make it faster. > > Just thinking out loud, If we can write all of the rules on a file, why > not do an iptables-save, perform a diff and apply

Re: Reformatting UI code

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 09:37:26AM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > One other thought here is that we might want to wait until, say, the day > after code freeze - if allowable - and then check in these kinds of changes > (basically give them special permission to go in after code freeze). > > I thin

Re: Reformatting UI code

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 09:37:26AM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote: >> One other thought here is that we might want to wait until, say, the day >> after code freeze - if allowable - and then check in these kinds of changes >> (basically give the

Re: [Discuss] Apply rules on Virtual Router

+1 It is also much better if CS supports adding multiple rules in one request. 2013/7/23 Nguyen Anh Tu > Just still thinking about the incremental applying solution... > > +1 for writing rules to file. > > > 2013/7/23 Alex Huang > > > The file approach will definitely make it faster. > > > >

Re: Regression failures

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:56:02AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Thanks Sowmya, I see more issues in the list now when the component is > Automation. Filtered this further down to : """ project = CloudStack AND (status = Open OR status = Reopened OR status = "Ready To Review") AND (summary

Review Request 12865: CLOUDSTACK-3693 - Fix more account objects

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12865/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3693 R

New Components on JIRA

The following new components have been added to JIRA to narrow down issues into the right buckets. (name, description) --- * Infra - Infrastructure managed by the project - CloudStack - (jenkins, builds, repos, mirrors) * SystemVM - SystemVM appliances, images, scripts, ssvm, cpvm * Virtual Rout

Review Request 12874: Fix reboot failures with wait time

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12874/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Repository: cloudstack-gi

[Proposal] Routing between guest networks in VLAN isolation method.

Hi guys, I write a proposal about implementing routing method for guest networks using VLAN isolation. At the moment, they can reach each other due to interVLAN routing in VPC model, but can not in Guest network model. So the key point is make some static routes between them, including iptables ru

Re: New Components on JIRA

+1, good stuff Prasanna. I'm a fan of more concise components to be filing against. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > The following new components have been added to JIRA to narrow down > issues into the right buckets. > > (name, description) > --- > * Infra - Infras

RE: New Components on JIRA

> -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: 23 July 2013 22:36 > To: CloudStack Dev > Subject: New Components on JIRA > > The following new components have been added to JIRA to narrow down > issues into the right buckets. > > (name, description) > ---

Re: [rant] stupid test cases

In terms of integration tests, it could be broken up into smaller pieces, but as part of an overall 'networking functional' suite. Maybe we need to further divide the tests between functional tests and unit or integration tests. We really need to improve the testing around error handling and the li

Re: [Proposal] Routing between guest networks in VLAN isolation method.

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: > Hi guys, > > I write a proposal about implementing routing method for guest networks > using VLAN isolation. At the moment, they can reach each other due to > interVLAN routing in VPC model, but can not in Guest network model. So the > key po

Re: [Proposal] Routing between guest networks in VLAN isolation method.

it looks like this is meant to enable routing between two different guest isolated networks. Also suggests the ability to allow natted traffic through another accounts network. I'd like to know more as to why someone would want this, I dont see how the natting would work since the CIDR for both net

Re: [Proposal] Routing between guest networks in VLAN isolation method.

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 01:26:08PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I write a proposal about implementing routing method for guest networks > > using VLAN isolation. At the moment, they can reach each other due to > > interVLAN

Localization pages on Jira

Hello, I've add a new section "Localization L10N" in Development section. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Localization+%28L10N%29 Currently there have 2 pages: * Debug Web UI with another language than English

[GSOC]cannot add host with the lastest master

Hi all, When I deploy CloudStack using the latest master, I can start jetty but it gave me the following error: com.google.gson.JsonParseException: The JsonDeserializer com.cloud.agent.transport.ArrayTypeAdaptor@3bfd6f73 failed to deserialize json object [{"StartupRoutingCommand":{"cpus":2,

Re: [Proposal] Routing between guest networks in VLAN isolation method.

@David: it just only add a feature for guest network mode. If a VPC has too much tiers, maybe one VPC router is not enough. @Ahmad: this proposal use a route instead of a nat. Vms can talk via privateIP. Of course, VMs in two guest networks currently can reach each other via hairpinNAT. @Chip: For

Re: Review Request 12864: CLOUDSTACK-3697 Fix cleanup LB failure

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12864/#review23706 --- Review 12864 PASSED the build test The url of build cloudstack-maste

RE: [DESIGN] Why is enum a class...

Emm, it's not intended as a pun, but now I learned this pun :) > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 8:43 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DESIGN] Why is enum a class... > > The first thing I noti

Re: [GSOC]cannot add host with the lastest master

I suggest updating the agent on host as well

Re: [rant] stupid test cases

Prasanna, If we broke these tests down into smaller test specific test cases, could we automate them into one specific end-to-end test together? I.e. (And I'm over simplifying this for the sake of the e-mail) 1. Create Zone 2. Create Domain 3. Create Accounts 4. Create Users 5. Create Networks

RE: [DISCUSS] Upgrade path to ACS 4.2 from CCP

Ilya, Chip Are your concerns addressed? If so I would like to proceed with adding this upgrade path. Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 3:54 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCU

Re: New user - Introduction

Welcome René! Glad to have you join. Matt On 7/19/13 4:19 AM, "René Diepstraten" wrote: >Hi everyone. > >Since I have joined the mailing list, I'd like to say hello and introduce >myself. >My name is Rene Diepstraten, am a system administrator and the company I >work for ( PCextreme ) uses Ap

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrade path to ACS 4.2 from CCP

My only concern was testing. Looks like that's handled. Let's roll with it. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 06:15:33PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Ilya, Chip > > Are your concerns addressed? If so I would like to proceed with adding this > upgrade path. > > Animesh > > > -Original Message

RE: [DESIGN] Why is enum a class...

Speaking of method on enum, I used to think it's very handy feature but finally I failed on some scenarios and switched to own defined class. The problem is enum is singleton that you can't save stateful data in it. For example: public enum Type { private Object userData; privat

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrade path to ACS 4.2 from CCP

Thank you, Chip. If nobody else objects, I'm planning to commit CCP-CS db upgrade code to the master/4.2 builds tomorrow. -Alena. From: Chip Childers mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Da

Ruby dev wanted

Hi folks, I committed to do an interoperability workshop in Madrid, Spain in september: http://www.cloudplugfest.org/cloud-interoperability-week/detailed-program All "four sisters" of cloud are represented. The main goal is to show that we can talk to CloudStack with OCCI and even CIMI standard

Re: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some questions. =)

On Jul 22, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Woot, making progress - unsurprisingly, all of the jclouds live tests that > expect to be able to create a VM and then SSH into it fail, but that's > entirely reasonable. =) I'm making progress through the other failing tests > - catching some

Re: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some questions. =)

Once I get it a bit more refined, yeah - probably gonna talk about it a bit at the ACS meetup in Santa Clara next month too. A. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Jul 22, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > > > Woot, making progress - unsurprisingly, all of

Re: [GSOC]cannot add host with the lastest master

Hi Wei, Thank you for your reply. On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 02:08:36 +0800, Wei ZHOU wrote: I suggest updating the agent on host as well I run yum install cloudstack-agent on the kvm host, it told me that it's already the latest version. I found the post here:https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow

Review Request 12877: Support HTTP to HTTPS redirect for UCS

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12877/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Frank Zhang. Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/

Re: Reformatting UI code

Yeah, I agree, as well, that ideally such a change would go into the younger branch (master, in this case) as opposed to being placed in a branch that is about to be frozen. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > -Original Message-

Re: [GSOC]cannot add host with the lastest master

Hi Meng, On 07/23/2013 09:28 PM, Han,Meng wrote: Hi Wei, Thank you for your reply. On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 02:08:36 +0800, Wei ZHOU wrote: I suggest updating the agent on host as well I run yum install cloudstack-agent on the kvm host, it told me that it's already the latest version. I found

RE: Reformatting UI code

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:36 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Jessica Wang; Brian Federle; Pranav Saxena; Ian Duffy > (i...@ianduffy.ie) > Subject: Re: Reformatting UI code > > On Tue, Jul 23, 20

Re: Review Request 12877: Support HTTP to HTTPS redirect for UCS

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12877/#review23712 --- Review 12877 PASSED the build test The url of build cloudstack-maste

Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar

In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this package in cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc and ucs) for easier maintenance. Please let me know if this sounds good. Thanks, Amogh On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" wrote:

Re: Review Request 12810: DnsMasqConfigurator need to be rewrite in bash script

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12810/#review23713 --- patches/systemvm/debian/config/root/dnsmasq.sh

Re: Review Request 12864: CLOUDSTACK-3697 Fix cleanup LB failure

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12864/#review23715 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sheng Yang On July 23, 2013, 4:01 p.m., Sowm

Re: Review Request 12865: CLOUDSTACK-3693 - Fix more account objects

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12865/#review23716 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sheng Yang On July 23, 2013, 4:58 p.m., Sowm

Re: Review Request 12864: CLOUDSTACK-3697 Fix cleanup LB failure

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12864/#review23718 --- Commit cfffe63afb60be77d43448ddcad18baf5f76d781 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12865: CLOUDSTACK-3693 - Fix more account objects

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12865/#review23717 --- Commit 7551d8b1a96426a85c35f6b377cd3024feff96c5 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12864: CLOUDSTACK-3697 Fix cleanup LB failure

> On July 23, 2013, 8:55 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Ship It! Pushed to 4.2 and master. - Sheng --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12864/#review23715

Re: Review Request 12864: CLOUDSTACK-3697 Fix cleanup LB failure

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12864/#review23720 --- Commit c6ea21866e008c467afdcc8b5d505c1c7978e164 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12865: CLOUDSTACK-3693 - Fix more account objects

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12865/#review23719 --- Commit 1898fa5046b6b73c85d9d0ed9490156d2278ece8 in branch refs/heads

RE: DNS Network Domain

Created Jira bug against this, was going to submit a UI patch: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3754 -Soheil From: Soheil Eizadi [seiz...@infoblox.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 6:36 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: DNS Network D

Review Request 12883: DNS value in Zone is not getting set in the Network created for the Zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12883/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOU

RE: [GSOC]cannot add host with the lastest master

Hi Meng, You may also be having problems with your system VM. Let me explain: The issue you see is caused by a change in JSON serialisation that happened in 4.2. Previously, we recorded an object's type using it's class' simple name. Now, we are using the full class name, which include the

  1   2   >