---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11906/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 7:03 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, D
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11858/#review22950
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Ram Ganesh
On June 30, 2013, 6:08 a.m., Raje
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12327/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 8:14 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:55:03PM +, Edison Su wrote:
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 11:22 AM
> > To: Edison Su
> > Cc:
> > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in
> > 4.2?
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 09,
Hi all.
I was able to change vlan creation behaviour by source code modification
(plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java),
had to comment several lines of code:
private String getPif(String bridge) {
String pif = matchPifFileInDirector
Hi,
I was looking at the integration test within
test/integration/component/test_ldap.py and noticed that all the
hostnames are hard coded IPs.
Is it possible to bring up a standalone embedded LDAP server such as
ApacheDS during execution of integration tests?
Thanks,
Ian
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:24:53AM +0100, Ian Duffy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at the integration test within
> test/integration/component/test_ldap.py and noticed that all the
> hostnames are hard coded IPs.
>
> Is it possible to bring up a standalone embedded LDAP server such as
> ApacheDS
> How difficult would it be? If it pollutes the
> test and makes it complex
I know there that there is a maven plugin that will bring up an
apacheds server based of flat ldif files:
http://ldap-maven-plugin.btmatthews.com/. Would it be possible to
trigger that to startup when cloud-client-ui jetty
Hi,
Thanks to Chip and Alex. To test theories, we can use different solutions such
as random process, the Monte Carlo simulation, and so forth, and we do not even
always need to pay this much attention to details of a specific structure like
the Marvin testing page does for it.
However, by usi
Hi,
We are testing CS 4.1.0 with VMWare vSphere 5.0.
If we stop a VM using vCenter, CS doesn't try to restart it. In logs we
see :
Skip HA for VMware VM i-xx
In source code, we can see :
@Override
public void scheduleRestartForVmsOnHost(final HostVO host, boolean
investigate) {
[...]
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:43:07AM +0100, Ian Duffy wrote:
> > How difficult would it be? If it pollutes the
> > test and makes it complex
>
> I know there that there is a maven plugin that will bring up an
> apacheds server based of flat ldif files:
> http://ldap-maven-plugin.btmatthews.com/. Wou
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12427/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 10:14 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12427/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 10:19 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 02:47:44AM -0700, Linux TUX wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to Chip and Alex. To test theories, we can use different
> solutions such as random process, the Monte Carlo simulation, and so
> forth, and we do not even always need to pay this much attention to
> details of a specific
I tried to apply this patch on 4.1. it won't. Does anybody have an idea on
how to implement the same in 4.1 It seems backporting is not an options as
utilities used did not exist back then.
regards,
Daan
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:14 AM, daan Hoogland wrote:
>This is an automatically genera
> Sounds like a good idea if all config is in flat files. Runnable from
> maven and can be linked with the checkin tests
Newbie maven question
Is it possible to do something like:
mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty-run
:cloud-plugin-user-authenticator-ldap ldap:run
On 10 July 2013 11:11, Prasan
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:28:05AM +0100, Ian Duffy wrote:
> > Sounds like a good idea if all config is in flat files. Runnable from
> > maven and can be linked with the checkin tests
>
> Newbie maven question
>
> Is it possible to do something like:
> mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty-run
> :cl
> On July 10, 2013, 7:28 a.m., Ram Ganesh wrote:
> > Ship It!
Thanks for the review.
I have to rebase with latest head and then post the patch again.
- Rajesh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://revie
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12427/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 10:56 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12358/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 10:56 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Meh
Hi,
I'd like to request a patch request for both 4.1.1 and 4.2 for issue
CS-3904.
Commit 8e4e56f73175363038a5361fe99e882562c2913a resolves this issue, but
it should imho be fixed in 4.1.1 since this is hurting KVM installations
with (recurring) snapshotting.
Link to bug: https://issues.apa
To all dubliners out there, meetup tonight:
https://tito.io/tcube/cloudstack-clients-and-wrappers
Cu there ,
-Sebastien
This looks like a serious issue. Cloudstack goes into a bad state due to this.
From the UI the host first needs to be put into maintenance and only after that
the host can be deleted. But if deleteHost API is directly invoked there is no
such restriction (there is no check to see the ResourceSta
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11858/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 12:37 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokha
Adding Wido to the CC.
Wido, what do you think about adding a mirror or two from your RPM / DEB
repo server?
-chip
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 07:31:05PM -0500, Matthew E. Porter wrote:
> If there is a need, we (Contegix) are happy to host one.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Matthew
>
>
> ---
> Matthew E. P
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11670/#review22953
---
Commit 527080e8effe675e7875fff6a0a69de606e3e3eb in branch
refs/head
I would not bother to look at it, if I were your, Dharmesh. Find a good
lightweigth xmlunit-like tool or another xml comaparison tool to do the
checking. parsers and dom generators can do whatever they like with
attribute order. I would say not with element order, but still trying to
make the xml
Hi all,
So we've run into a couple of features that have turned out to have
never really been "production grade", perhaps due to their creation as
prototypes during the cloud.com startup period. Swift, Bare metal
provisioning and OVM are examples. Bare metal is obviously resolved
now, but Swift
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 03:01:35PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> I would not bother to look at it, if I were your, Dharmesh. Find a good
> lightweigth xmlunit-like tool or another xml comaparison tool to do the
> checking. parsers and dom generators can do whatever they like with
> attribute order
@chip and @Daan Thanks for the reply.
I think there is some misunderstanding. The test case is not written by me.
It is failing on an already existing test case after I did refactoring,
which is why I am worried.
Thanks,
Dharmesh
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed,
Now I'm seeing this issue after pulling the latest and rebuilding.
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-client-ui: Could not resolve
dependencies for project
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-client-ui:war:4.2.0-SNAPSHOT: Could not find
artifact
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-plugin-storage-
> Will the ldap:run launch another war?
I have no idea Just reading it from
http://ldap-maven-plugin.btmatthews.com/run-mojo.html
I think what I want to do is execute different phases on different projects.
I could do:
mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run
followed by:
mvn -pl :cloud-plugin-
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:45:39AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:mathias.mull...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 5:40 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Edison Su
> > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybo
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:18:18PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to request a patch request for both 4.1.1 and 4.2 for issue
> CS-3904.
>
> Commit 8e4e56f73175363038a5361fe99e882562c2913a resolves this issue,
> but it should imho be fixed in 4.1.1 since this is hurting KVM
>
You can use NFS with a single server, but if you choose local storage
instead, you need to go into the global options and tell system vms to
use local storage. Parameter "system.vm.use.local.storage". I'm not
sure that's the problem, but somewhere in the log it may lead you to
why there is no serve
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:45:39AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:mathias.mull...@citrix.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 5:40 PM
>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.
I created that document, as a suggestion. I never got feedback. The
way it worked previously was sort of a happy accident, which was
'fixed' when the code changed to accept overlapping vlan numbers on
multiple physical devices (hence the bridge name change).
However... I believe there is still a
Could I get some comments on the following proposal?
Background:
System VMs are passed their configuration details in the 'bootArgs' field of
the StartCommand used to create and start them. For instance, with XenServer,
the vm.set_PV_args command is used.
When the SystemVM is launched, the clo
Seb,
Please circulate a picture of yourself in the branded clothing distributed
during the event.
;)
DL
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 10 July 2013 12:38 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Dublin meetup tonight
>
> To all d
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, at 06:38 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> To all dubliners out there, meetup tonight:
I tweeted this from the CloudStack account. Happy to add these to our
social media for promotion ahead of time if folks send a note to
marketing@ with the full info...
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Br
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12445/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 3:31 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Sebastien Goa
Ignore that….I was running mvn with sudo, so of course it couldn't find the
artifact…
On Jul 10, 2013, at 9:36 AM, "SuichII, Christopher"
wrote:
> Now I'm seeing this issue after pulling the latest and rebuilding.
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-client-ui: Could not resol
That seems to be the latest stable release for the KVM template (according
to the 4.1 install docs). You can also get bleeding edge templates from:
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/build-systemvm-master, say if youre
interested in ipv6 support and other features that didnt make it into
'-stable'.
On 7/10/13 8:59 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:45:39AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> > -Original Message-
>>> > From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:mathias.mull...@citrix.com]
>>> > Sent: Tuesday,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 03:50:13PM +, Mathias Mullins wrote:
>
> On 7/10/13 8:59 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Chip Childers
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:45:39AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> > -Original Message-
>
It's decisions like this (dropping a previously advertised supported feature
simply because it wasn't tested) are part of the reasons that have changed our
plan to use Cloudstack in our corporate environment. I'm glad to see Chip,
David, and others pushing back on the decision to just drop it a
Maurice,
You should check the logs before this exception trace is logged, just follow
the consoleproxy-1 thread to see what went wrong in the deployment process.
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 6:59 AM
To: dev
On 10 Jul 2013, at 17:08, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, at 06:38 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>> To all dubliners out there, meetup tonight:
>
> I tweeted this from the CloudStack account. Happy to add these to our
> social media for promotion ahead of time if folks send a note
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12445/#review22959
---
plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/Citri
I like,
thanks for starting this discussion.
Please ignore the rest of this mail as it is not of any consequence.
As a folowup, I would like ti propose to move any peace of code to branches
if it meets the qualifications you mention; not (full) functional, not
production ready. And i would like
I understand, so either change the checker (as i sugested) or change the
expected result in the testcase.
Op 10 jul. 2013 15:37 schreef "Dharmesh Kakadia" het
volgende:
> @chip and @Daan Thanks for the reply.
>
> I think there is some misunderstanding. The test case is not written by me.
> It is
(Note: Sending this to the mailing lists as blogs.apache.org is down for
the moment.)
The community is busy working on 4.2.0, and there's much to be done
before the release is ready. This week, we're taking a look at some of
the interesting discussions going on in the the community about the
next
No meeting today, as we had only four people show up.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Hi,
FYI: I created a ldapplugin feature branch for Ian to commit his patches in.
Cheers,
-Sebastien
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12273/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 5:43 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Caleb Call wrote:
> Although my voice doesn't mean a lot, I too would vote this as
> a blocker. If it's going to be dropped, users need to be notified well
> in advanced so they can be make plans moving forward instead of suddenly
> being stranded on an out-dated
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, at 08:40 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on CLOUDSTACK-3350, we have a known user. IMO, this should be a
> blocker. We should either fix Swift to support users or revert the
> object store branch merge changes.
+1
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @j
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11649/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 5:50 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Si
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11910/#review22962
---
Commit f7f826d4f516144069e26b3bb112e8c22414123e in branch refs/heads
1. Add swift back is just one or two days work, plus maybe one or two days, to
setup a swift environment.
2. There is no single user from the "group of swift users" jumping into the
thread. Do they really care about this feature?
3. If we add this feature back, will we test it for each release? S
I wonder if this Swift-support question has gone out to the CloudStack
users e-mail list for opinions?
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Edison Su wrote:
> 1. Add swift back is just one or two days work, plus maybe one or two
> days, to setup a swift environment.
> 2. There is no single user fr
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:13:07PM +, Edison Su wrote:
> 2. There is no single user from the "group of swift users" jumping into the
> thread. Do they really care about this feature?
This is a developer list. Even our users don't have to be on the users
list. We have at least one known user
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:13:07PM +, Edison Su wrote:
> 1. Add swift back is just one or two days work, plus maybe one or two days,
> to setup a swift environment.
Great!
> 3. If we add this feature back, will we test it for each release? Such as
> adding it into automate test? Right now,
Hi,
I've been primarily working on the 4.2 branch as of late and was setting up
a VMware cluster for the first time in a while.
I noticed from an error message that before I can set up a cluster based on
VMware that I must add the VMware Datacenter to the Zone. I went ahead and
did this.
I then
This should be done by ESX instead of CS, to CS ESX hypervisor is
externally managed (vCenter)
I guess you need to enable HA in your vmware configuration
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:11 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
> We are testing CS 4.1.0 with VMWare vSphere 5.0.
> If we stop a VM using vCenter, CS doesn't
one typically adds a cluster during zone creation or adds the cluster as a
unit (which maps to the vmware dc/cluster). I believe at the cluster
addition phase, is where you should be prompted for credentials. Give that
a try, see if you get any miles out of that.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:35 PM,
It "should" work for CS to do the HA (typically with the VMware
cluster *not* having HA enabled).
Nicolas, perhaps open a bug?
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Jörgen Maas wrote:
> This should be done by ESX instead of CS, to CS ESX hypervisor is
> externally managed (vCenter)
> I guess you need
Hi Ahmad,
Yeah, it seems to ask for vCenter credentials both when adding the VMware
Datacenter to the Zone and when creating a CS Cluster based on a VMware
Cluster.
Interesting
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
> one typically adds a cluster during zone creation or adds th
Hi,
I have a question about how current storage allocators work.
Let's say I have two primary storages with the same storage tag.
If I execute compute and disk offerings that reference that storage tag
only, will one primary storage be (essentially) filled up before the other
is utilized or do w
Currently for storage allocators, only random or firstfit or user-dispersing
strategies are present. This is governed by the 'vm.allocation.algorithm'
global config.
So for you case with storage tags, if you choose random, either of the pools
can get chosen. For firstfit, you will mostly see one
Oh, when you say "random," does that mean random among the storage pools
that have, say, the necessary storage tag or does random ignore storage
tags?
Thanks
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> OK, thanks!
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:40 P
Thanks Chip for starting this thread.
I can at least think of the netapp plugin integration as something that was
tried before ASF but no longer tested and used.
I'm all for coming up with this list but I don't see how this list can be
conclusive. The problem that Edison dealt with in swift su
CS will see the new size,
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 5:25 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Expanding a volume on a SAN
Hey Anthony,
I assume this would be a candidate situation where
'random among the storage pools that have, say, the necessary storage tag'
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:44 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Storage Allocator Question
Oh, when you say "
OK, thanks!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Prachi Damle wrote:
> Currently for storage allocators, only random or firstfit or
> user-dispersing strategies are present. This is governed by the
> 'vm.allocation.algorithm' global config.
> So for you case with storage tags, if you choose random,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 08:44:24PM +, Alex Huang wrote:
> Thanks Chip for starting this thread.
>
> I can at least think of the netapp plugin integration as something that was
> tried before ASF but no longer tested and used.
>
Awesome, that's one. Any others?
> I'm all for coming up with
Very good, thanks you!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Prachi Damle wrote:
> 'random among the storage pools that have, say, the necessary storage tag'
>
> Prachi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:44 PM
OK, great - thanks!
So, it sounds like on XenServer, you have to perform some manual activity
for it to see the new size of the iSCSI target (and there is probably a
similar requirement with ESX), but CloudStack will notice the size
difference automatically (once the storage repository or datastor
All,
For me, there are significant issues with the object_store patch. First, it
was merged to master with a unresolved -1 against it. Second, it merged a
feature depreciation without community consensus. On their own, each of these
actions violate core community values. Cumulatively, I am
John,
I'm concerned that object store implementations that's going into 4.2 will
repeat this fate if we don't add them into the automated test environment.
Perhaps, you, me, Edison, Prassana, and perhaps Thomas can work together about
how to add the current implementations into the regression
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12227/#review22981
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On July 4, 2013, 12:32 p.m., Rajes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11984/#review22980
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On July 2, 2013, 11:09 p.m., Venka
You might have to force a reconnection to the xenserver in order for CS to see
it. On every connection, CS checks these items and updates its database.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 2:14 PM
> To:
I'm working on setting up a CS installation with a single XenServer host.
However, once I add the primary and secondary storage, the system vms fail to
start up.
For readability, I've put several logs and traces here:
http://pastebin.com/eb51JDHF <--- CS Mgmt Log 1
http://pastebin.com/mbfRCei3
Hey Alex,
When you say, "force a reconnection," I'm not sure to what part of the
system you're referring. Is this an action performed on the CloudStack side?
Thanks!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> You might have to force a reconnection to the xenserver in order for CS to
@Abhi - Just to keep you updated code will be pushed here frequently
to show progress. I will let you know when it is in a good enough
state to be reviewed/merged.
On 10 July 2013 16:54, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FYI: I created a ldapplugin feature branch for Ian to commit his patches i
On Jul 10, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 08:44:24PM +, Alex Huang wrote:
>> Thanks Chip for starting this thread.
>>
>> I can at least think of the netapp plugin integration as something that was
>> tried before ASF but no longer tested and used.
>>
>
>
Hi,
I was hoping to run a little VM from CloudStack on a host in an ESX cluster.
Do we have a tiny template similar to the one we use for XenServer that I
might be able to leverage?
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:38 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] What other "features" or code is sitting around that
> might be suffering from bit rot?
>
>
> On Jul 10, 2013, at 5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11910/#review22982
---
Commit 79bec35476508b23077311888a00189573c5c9d9 in branch refs/heads
Code for S3 API is lying under awsapi project. Only EC2 API under awsapi is
functionally tested.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:40 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Prachi Damle
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] What other "features" or code is sitting aroun
> -Original Message-
> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 2:15 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: 'Caleb Call'
> Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
>
> All,
>
> For me, there are significant is
short answer... dont think so. having said that, I believe we used DSL
which can be downloaded from:
http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/
its around 50 megs :)
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was hoping to run a little VM from CloudSt
I spent two days to install Basio, about one week to get Cloudian work, don't
know how many days I need to get swift work.
Guys, don't blame me not support this feature and that feature, please just
take a look at how many work/hours I need, to a simple thing work.
> -Original Message-
>
ah sorry. Yes. From the CloudStack management UI, you can force cloudstack to
reconnect to the host. This forces cloudstack to flush it's connection and
restablish the connection. On restablishing the connection, there's a series
of checks and information gathered. Size of the storage pool
>
> I agree with your points above, but think that we need to take this step by
> step. Let's figure out what code isn't actually in shape, based on historical
> understanding first. We then at least have a target to ask the next question:
> what's covered by testing (automated or manual) for ea
On Jul 8, 2013, at 11:58 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Fresh install /setup, I am getting error:
>
> [root@cloud ~]# /etc/init.d/cloudstack-management start
> /etc/sysconfig/cloudstack-management: line 21:
> /etc/cloudstack/management/tomcat6.conf: No such file or directory
> Starti
Geoff, can you answer Keerthi ?
thanks
On Jun 29, 2013, at 3:39 AM, Keerthiraja SJ wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Is there any patch file for cloudstack-4.1 to added xenserver-6.2.0 .
>
>
>
> I knew that
> plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/discoverer/XcpServerDiscoverer.java
If you put the primary storage in maintenance mode to evacuate the VM, when you
cancel maintenance mode for the primary storage, CS will get the new size of
the primary storage.
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4
Cooli like that even better. :)
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:17 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Expanding a volume on a SAN
>
> If you put the primary storage in maintenance mode to
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
